<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s Sending The Email?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/whos-sending-the-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/whos-sending-the-email/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:00:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: drhousing</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/whos-sending-the-email/comment-page-1/#comment-127800</link>
		<dc:creator>drhousing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10227#comment-127800</guid>
		<description>CNBC has pumped the market up and down so many times.  They have for so many years now, walked the fine line of insider trading.  Now they are breaking stories on the air via instant e-mails?  Who really is that source?  After all, in these moments we are talking about real money.

I&#039;m surprised in this octagon of talking heads how some are &quot;shocked&quot; that the TARP money is being used for other things.  Do these people have no regard for the rule of law?  No wonder why the markets keep tanking.  What is good for Wall Street is good for the average citizen eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNBC has pumped the market up and down so many times.  They have for so many years now, walked the fine line of insider trading.  Now they are breaking stories on the air via instant e-mails?  Who really is that source?  After all, in these moments we are talking about real money.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised in this octagon of talking heads how some are &#8220;shocked&#8221; that the TARP money is being used for other things.  Do these people have no regard for the rule of law?  No wonder why the markets keep tanking.  What is good for Wall Street is good for the average citizen eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitchn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/whos-sending-the-email/comment-page-1/#comment-127744</link>
		<dc:creator>mitchn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10227#comment-127744</guid>
		<description>Good riddance to Dingell. He&#039;s part of the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good riddance to Dingell. He&#8217;s part of the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ardano</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/whos-sending-the-email/comment-page-1/#comment-127704</link>
		<dc:creator>ardano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10227#comment-127704</guid>
		<description>I suspect that the email came from a staffer who did not realize john was on the air.  There are many hill staffers who are motivated to &quot;leak&quot; not for personal gain...like those who float Street rumors to run stocks...their interests are to see what they define as accurate information get distributed.  

As for differences between the House and Senate.  This is a problem.  Years ago there was honor among staffs.  Now there is distrust between certain staffs.  Sometimes its a  rivalry between House and Senate.  Other times there are conflicts between majority/dem and minority/rep staffs working on the same committees.  

By the way, today we saw a perfect example of this.  On the Senate side Ted Stevens was hailed by his colleagues.  Stevens is one of the senior most Senators...along with Kennedy and Byrd, to name a few.  On the other side of the Hill, John Dingell, who will become the longest serving Member of the House of Representatives in February, was stripped of his Chairmenship of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee by Henry Waxman.  

The implications for investors are important.  Big John, as he&#039;s known, built that Committee.  It controls the legislation it does because of Dingell&#039;s skill over the years.  For Waxman to take control away from the senior most Member in the House says something...It says Pelosi wanted Waxman.  Dingell and Pelosi have been at odds for some time now.  Dingell represents Michigan and protects the autos.  Waxman comes from California and is known for his attack hearings.  If you&#039;re a domestic auto company who would you rather deal with?  This is a bigger story for the autos than an errant email.  

Yesterday, beltway types knew what Reid and Pelosi said at the press conference...they did not have the votes to pass an auto bailout.  With Dingell running his Committee, he would have traded votes for this bailout.  Losing his Chairmanship makes that more difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that the email came from a staffer who did not realize john was on the air.  There are many hill staffers who are motivated to &#8220;leak&#8221; not for personal gain&#8230;like those who float Street rumors to run stocks&#8230;their interests are to see what they define as accurate information get distributed.  </p>
<p>As for differences between the House and Senate.  This is a problem.  Years ago there was honor among staffs.  Now there is distrust between certain staffs.  Sometimes its a  rivalry between House and Senate.  Other times there are conflicts between majority/dem and minority/rep staffs working on the same committees.  </p>
<p>By the way, today we saw a perfect example of this.  On the Senate side Ted Stevens was hailed by his colleagues.  Stevens is one of the senior most Senators&#8230;along with Kennedy and Byrd, to name a few.  On the other side of the Hill, John Dingell, who will become the longest serving Member of the House of Representatives in February, was stripped of his Chairmenship of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee by Henry Waxman.  </p>
<p>The implications for investors are important.  Big John, as he&#8217;s known, built that Committee.  It controls the legislation it does because of Dingell&#8217;s skill over the years.  For Waxman to take control away from the senior most Member in the House says something&#8230;It says Pelosi wanted Waxman.  Dingell and Pelosi have been at odds for some time now.  Dingell represents Michigan and protects the autos.  Waxman comes from California and is known for his attack hearings.  If you&#8217;re a domestic auto company who would you rather deal with?  This is a bigger story for the autos than an errant email.  </p>
<p>Yesterday, beltway types knew what Reid and Pelosi said at the press conference&#8230;they did not have the votes to pass an auto bailout.  With Dingell running his Committee, he would have traded votes for this bailout.  Losing his Chairmanship makes that more difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftback</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/whos-sending-the-email/comment-page-1/#comment-127660</link>
		<dc:creator>leftback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10227#comment-127660</guid>
		<description>Absolutely true. Every last shred of confidence is being erased by this behavior.
How many people have been Gasparino&#039;ed in this bear market?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely true. Every last shred of confidence is being erased by this behavior.<br />
How many people have been Gasparino&#8217;ed in this bear market?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
