<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Dream?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/bad-dream/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/bad-dream/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:31:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/bad-dream/comment-page-1/#comment-130494</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11720#comment-130494</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Our Treasury should consider selling 100 year debt to lock in low yields while it still can&lt;/i&gt;

Ha! Remember when Clinton eliminated the 30 year bond? Now they want to sell 100 year debt? What sucker is going to buy that? This reminds me of the 125 year mortgages that the Japanese were getting on their houses. Ominous signs indeed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Our Treasury should consider selling 100 year debt to lock in low yields while it still can</i></p>
<p>Ha! Remember when Clinton eliminated the 30 year bond? Now they want to sell 100 year debt? What sucker is going to buy that? This reminds me of the 125 year mortgages that the Japanese were getting on their houses. Ominous signs indeed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
