<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GMAC: 0% Financing for Subprime FICO Scores</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/gmac-0-subprime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/gmac-0-subprime/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:40:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jonpublic</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/gmac-0-subprime/comment-page-2/#comment-136802</link>
		<dc:creator>jonpublic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=14539#comment-136802</guid>
		<description>@mannwich

My friends who bought cars recently all were jacked on interest rates despite good credit.  I&#039;m sure they have tougher restrictions than the mortgage companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mannwich</p>
<p>My friends who bought cars recently all were jacked on interest rates despite good credit.  I&#8217;m sure they have tougher restrictions than the mortgage companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZackAttack</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/gmac-0-subprime/comment-page-2/#comment-136796</link>
		<dc:creator>ZackAttack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=14539#comment-136796</guid>
		<description>Wow, and now we&#039;re going to bailout their suppliers as well:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZm0zupPvbB8&amp;refer=home

I guess it&#039;s a rhetorical question to ask about the exit strategy for all this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, and now we&#8217;re going to bailout their suppliers as well:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZm0zupPvbB8&amp;refer=home" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZm0zupPvbB8&amp;refer=home</a></p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s a rhetorical question to ask about the exit strategy for all this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donna</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/gmac-0-subprime/comment-page-2/#comment-136752</link>
		<dc:creator>donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 02:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=14539#comment-136752</guid>
		<description>My mortgage is with GMAC. I feel like calling and demanding a lower rate, or else I refi with someone else. I gots lots of equity still, too.  ;^)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mortgage is with GMAC. I feel like calling and demanding a lower rate, or else I refi with someone else. I gots lots of equity still, too.  ;^)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/gmac-0-subprime/comment-page-2/#comment-136738</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 23:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=14539#comment-136738</guid>
		<description>Jeff, 

you&#039;d be bettter off buying an existing &#039;Repo&#039; outfit, getting through the &#039;vetting&#039; process--pointed at a &#039;new&#039; firm--of your customers, would be a lengthy ordeal, all by itself..

but, remember: Kevlar can be fashioned into snappy vests, but it&#039;s hard to see through..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, </p>
<p>you&#8217;d be bettter off buying an existing &#8216;Repo&#8217; outfit, getting through the &#8216;vetting&#8217; process&#8211;pointed at a &#8216;new&#8217; firm&#8211;of your customers, would be a lengthy ordeal, all by itself..</p>
<p>but, remember: Kevlar can be fashioned into snappy vests, but it&#8217;s hard to see through..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mannwich</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/gmac-0-subprime/comment-page-2/#comment-136736</link>
		<dc:creator>Mannwich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 23:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=14539#comment-136736</guid>
		<description>Like I said yesterday, the Repo Man is a happy man these days.  Wonder if it&#039;s time to start a Repo franchise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said yesterday, the Repo Man is a happy man these days.  Wonder if it&#8217;s time to start a Repo franchise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KidDynamite</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/gmac-0-subprime/comment-page-2/#comment-136734</link>
		<dc:creator>KidDynamite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=14539#comment-136734</guid>
		<description>i blogged about this exact topic yesterday:

http://fridayinvegas.blogspot.com/2008/12/gmac-theyll-make-up-for-it-in-volume.html

Karl Denninger also had a good post on it:

http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/704-Regulatory-Fraud-by-Idiocy,-Example-9463.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i blogged about this exact topic yesterday:</p>
<p><a href="http://fridayinvegas.blogspot.com/2008/12/gmac-theyll-make-up-for-it-in-volume.html" rel="nofollow">http://fridayinvegas.blogspot.com/2008/12/gmac-theyll-make-up-for-it-in-volume.html</a></p>
<p>Karl Denninger also had a good post on it:</p>
<p><a href="http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/704-Regulatory-Fraud-by-Idiocy,-Example-9463.html" rel="nofollow">http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/704-Regulatory-Fraud-by-Idiocy,-Example-9463.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mannwich</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/gmac-0-subprime/comment-page-2/#comment-136729</link>
		<dc:creator>Mannwich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=14539#comment-136729</guid>
		<description>@jonpublic:  Good point but if the people/entities they&#039;re loaning the money to aren&#039;t able to pay it back (hence, their lousy FICO score), what&#039;s the point?  That&#039;s the whole issue with this - the people who qualify for credit don&#039;t want it and the people who haven&#039;t been able to get credit as of late, probably shouldn&#039;t be getting it based on their inability to pay it back.  That&#039;s partly what got us into this mess in the first place, is it not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jonpublic:  Good point but if the people/entities they&#8217;re loaning the money to aren&#8217;t able to pay it back (hence, their lousy FICO score), what&#8217;s the point?  That&#8217;s the whole issue with this &#8211; the people who qualify for credit don&#8217;t want it and the people who haven&#8217;t been able to get credit as of late, probably shouldn&#8217;t be getting it based on their inability to pay it back.  That&#8217;s partly what got us into this mess in the first place, is it not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonpublic</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/gmac-0-subprime/comment-page-2/#comment-136727</link>
		<dc:creator>jonpublic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=14539#comment-136727</guid>
		<description>I would like to point out that they are doing what the government wants. Loaning the money out. Getting financing going. Wasn&#039;t that the whole point of the bailout?

Has any of the other financial firms said what they are doing with their share?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to point out that they are doing what the government wants. Loaning the money out. Getting financing going. Wasn&#8217;t that the whole point of the bailout?</p>
<p>Has any of the other financial firms said what they are doing with their share?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/gmac-0-subprime/comment-page-2/#comment-136722</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=14539#comment-136722</guid>
		<description>AGG, 

that&#039;s a good art.  Pam Martens is an intelligent person, her stuff is cogent, and reads well, thereby.

Hope &#039;009 finds us, all, Well &amp; Wise, Hearty &amp; Hale..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AGG, </p>
<p>that&#8217;s a good art.  Pam Martens is an intelligent person, her stuff is cogent, and reads well, thereby.</p>
<p>Hope &#8216;009 finds us, all, Well &amp; Wise, Hearty &amp; Hale..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AGG</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/gmac-0-subprime/comment-page-2/#comment-136719</link>
		<dc:creator>AGG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=14539#comment-136719</guid>
		<description>To those who like to look at strange coincidences.
Steve Barry, this means you.
The intra-day chart for the Dow looks like a mini version of the Dow from 1996 until 2008. And note the last part. I don&#039;t think there will be a rebound in 2009. The manipulations in 2008 have kept the market much higher than it should be. So look for 3,500 to 4,000 before the 1930 type rebound. That may not happen until 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those who like to look at strange coincidences.<br />
Steve Barry, this means you.<br />
The intra-day chart for the Dow looks like a mini version of the Dow from 1996 until 2008. And note the last part. I don&#8217;t think there will be a rebound in 2009. The manipulations in 2008 have kept the market much higher than it should be. So look for 3,500 to 4,000 before the 1930 type rebound. That may not happen until 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
