Let Them Eat Treasurys
Good Evening: Today the U.S. capital markets continued the slow healing process that began on November 21. Stocks and commodities rose while the dollar and Treasurys fell, a combination of outcomes rarely seen since last July. Even the VIX tailed off, so the seemingly placid activity surrounding today’s market action may have been more than just random noise. More importantly, however, the question of just how we will finance this whole mess is finally being raised over at the Treasury Department. Many options will be considered, but in my opiniion, we’ll need to start thinking long term when pondering next year’s approach to debt issuance.
Stock markets around the world seemed to take no notice overnight of yesterday’s correction to stock prices in New York. Asian stock markets were particularly peppy, and our index futures responded by rallying prior to this morning’s open. A drop back to earth in this week’s report of mortgage purchase applications didn’t dent the rally, and stocks opened with gains of approximately 1%.. The major averages then took a breather following the release of the latest inventory figures. Inventories shrank by what looked to be an impressive 1.1%, but since sales fell by an even more impressive 4.1%, the inventories to sales ratio actually rose to a 20 month high (see Merrill’s take below).
Underneath the surface, some weakness in the dollar and some strength in various commodities put a nice bid into the commodity-related equities (see below). Financial stocks sat out the advance (the KBW bank index fell 1%), but energy and mining names rose by 5% to 15%. The newfound zest for energy, metals, and mining plays (infrastructure stocks were also firm) helped push the major averages to their best levels of the day by lunchtime. An afternoon swoon carried the indexes back toward the unchanged mark, but a rally in the final hour of trading left the averages up between 0.8% (Dow) and 2.3% (Russell 2000). Treasurys retreated in fairly quiet trading, and yields rose between 1 and 4 bps across the coupon curve. The dollar fell 0.5%, which was just enough to encourage the aforementioned buying (or shortcovering?) in commodities. A 4% pop in gold led the way, but crude oil, grains, and base metals were also nicely higher. The CRB finished the session with a gain of 2.6%.
We’ve seen plenty of advances in commodity prices since July, but all of them have rather quickly been rebuffed. Perhaps it will be the same with today’s rally, but the one asset class that has consistently been sought this year has been Treasury obligations. If “First, do no harm” is the cry of the physician, then the 2008 parallel in portfolio management might be similar: “First, seek safety — without regard to yield”. To a generation accustomed to double digit returns on capital, forsaking yield in the name of assuring a return of that capital is a tough transition to make. It’s been tough even for grizzled veterans who foresaw many of the problems now buffeting the global economy. PIMCO’s Bill Gross is one such manager, and he publicly expressed his regret today for not owning the big winner of 2008 (see below). Confession complete, Mr. Gross also says he’s sticking to his end of 2007 view that Treasurys offer little, if any, value at these levels. With all due respect to Merrill’s David Rosenberg, who’s been correctly bullish as Treasury yields approach Japan-like levels, I agree with Mr. Gross.
In addition to the Lilliputian-sized yields now on offer, perhaps another reason to avoid Treasurys can be inferred by reading the final article below. The Treasury Department announced today that it is considering “novel approaches” to the future issuance of U.S. government debt. Is it a pure coincidence that Gold perked up so much on the same day this statement hit the tape? Merrill Lynch discusses a few of the options open to the Treasury in their piece you see at the bottom of the page, but there is no escaping the fact that the U.S. will likely issue $2 Trillion in new securities in 2009. The math surrounding the large and compounding amount of interest our nation will be forking over in future years is daunting, and it will take novel approaches indeed to get all the paper out the door.
Let’s hope President-elect Obama’s Treasury Department resists the urge to issue T-Bills, despite the microscopic current cost of doing so. Such a program would subject our nation to rollover risk in future years, and those who yesterday sought to actually pay Uncle Sam for the privilege of holding their capital while riding out the current storm won’t be there (at least not on the same terms) once the storm finally passes. No, the novel thing to do would be to issue as much long dated paper as the markets will stand. Locking in the lowest long term rates in more than five decades is the cheapest bill we can hand future generations. Issue 50 year bonds, even 100 year obligations if need be. Just let investors seeking safety, duration, etc. flock in droves to these low yields. Let them, at some point in the future, feel the opposite form of regret that Bill Gross is feeling right now. It may sound silly in this environment, but at some point investors will come to scorn Treasurys almost as much as they do subprime mortgages today.
– Jack McHugh
U.S. Stocks Gain as Commodity Rally Offsets Auto-Rescue Concern
Gold Rises on Dollar’s Drop, Commodity Rally; Silver Gains
Pimco’s Bill Gross Regrets Not Buying Treasuries Amid Rally
U.S. Treasury Studying ‘Novel Approaches’ to Debt






December 11th, 2008 at 1:55 am
Excerpt: The Treasury Department announced today that it is considering “novel approaches” to the future issuance of U.S. government debt. Is it a pure coincidence that Gold perked up so much on the same day this statement hit the tape?
Other than gold, any reaction to this announcement – from bloggers, pundits, etc?
December 11th, 2008 at 5:05 am
USD was falling, so Gold rose, thats all!
December 11th, 2008 at 7:45 am
It’s amazing how quickly our focus shifts from one thing to another in this market. Things are really bad because of A, B, C, D and E. Two weeks later we think things are going to be fine, but A, B, C, D and E haven’t changed.
We still have to get through December’s job numbers, lowered consumer liquidity due to credit card companies putting on the squeeze, the redemptions when those hedge funds who “closed the doors” have to eventually open them and throwing money at the banks like crazy seems to have done nothing but create a bubble in treasuries. Companies that lowered guidance and were sold off, after they’d already been sold off on the expectation of that guidance, will be sold off again when Q4 shows they did what they said they would. The market loves to “sell off” the same news multiple times. What we really need to rally, apparently, is a nice even million monthly jobs number.
If we need something drastic it’s time for the government to just open their own bank and loan directly to businesses that need it. Let the existing banks fail. Sound ridiculous? Well we made a good start with the loans to Citigroup et al and are about to do the same with the automakers. If the bastards that took these hundreds of billions to improve the credit market won’t lend, bypass them.
December 11th, 2008 at 11:28 am
Treasury was very vague about what form “novel approaches” might take, so the reaction in the financial community will be muted until more details come out. The tie in to the gold rally might well be a reach on my part, but my general take is that investors’ appetite for gold will increase as our government’s appetite for intervening in the economy increases. The long term concern surrounds the Fed’s possible plan to put a ceiling on Treasury yields and it may have to monetize some of these purchases. It may not be today’s business to be concerned about excess monetary creation, but it will be during the years ahead.
December 11th, 2008 at 11:33 am
They are spending now what it was going to cost to get the boomers through retirement so take everything they are spending now and double it…at least. Then take all the rich smart money that will exit the US when they figure out how much this is all going to cost. Put those numbers down on a card and give it to your kids for Christmas. If they don’t kill you on the spot take them to the nearest mental health facility because they are clearly not in their right minds. At least they will fit in though
December 11th, 2008 at 11:35 am
I just realized that my last sentence may be taken as a shot at you Jack. That was not my intention. It was a shot at all of us collectively
December 11th, 2008 at 1:52 pm
It’s amazing how quickly our focus shifts from one thing to another in this market. Things are really bad because of A, B, C, D and E. Two weeks later we think things are going to be fine, but A, B, C, D and E haven’t changed.
Maybe I haven’t been paying close-enough attention lately, what with the holidays and vacation and whatnot, but has anything happened to make outstanding CDS any less of a colossal nightmare? It seems the coverage of swaps and their resolution has vanished, and if we’ve learned anything, it’s that ignoring a problem like that does NOT make it go away…
December 11th, 2008 at 2:45 pm
Jack,
I must object to your comment: “It may sound silly in this environment, but at some point investors will come to scorn Treasuries almost as much as they do subprime mortgages today”
I think that is an insult to subprime mortgages; at least they have a piece of property behind them. What do Treasuries have? I think investors may ultimately come to scorn the Treasuries MORE than sub prime.
;>)
December 11th, 2008 at 3:15 pm
LOL, PH. Jim Grant would surely agree with you!