<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NFP: -533,000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-533000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-533000/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:33:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mannwich</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-533000/comment-page-2/#comment-131283</link>
		<dc:creator>Mannwich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 22:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11939#comment-131283</guid>
		<description>@Patrick Neid:  Which means we are likely to see far worse numbers in December going forward well into &#039;09.  The real mess is just starting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Patrick Neid:  Which means we are likely to see far worse numbers in December going forward well into &#8217;09.  The real mess is just starting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Neid</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-533000/comment-page-2/#comment-131117</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Neid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11939#comment-131117</guid>
		<description>Bespoke put today&#039;s number in perspective.  How bad was it? It doesn&#039;t even make the top 40.   While the number was large the workforce has expanded accordingly. On a percent of the workforce today&#039;s number was 41st.

December 1974 was twice as bad.  Today&#039;s number would have had to exceed 1,000,000 to compare.

http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/bespoke/2008/12/41st-worst-monthly-jobs-report-on-recordyes-41st.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bespoke put today&#8217;s number in perspective.  How bad was it? It doesn&#8217;t even make the top 40.   While the number was large the workforce has expanded accordingly. On a percent of the workforce today&#8217;s number was 41st.</p>
<p>December 1974 was twice as bad.  Today&#8217;s number would have had to exceed 1,000,000 to compare.</p>
<p><a href="http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/bespoke/2008/12/41st-worst-monthly-jobs-report-on-recordyes-41st.html" rel="nofollow">http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/bespoke/2008/12/41st-worst-monthly-jobs-report-on-recordyes-41st.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RiskAverseAlert</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-533000/comment-page-2/#comment-131089</link>
		<dc:creator>RiskAverseAlert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11939#comment-131089</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll say it again... The bottom in July 1932 was months prior to the banking system going into its death spiral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll say it again&#8230; The bottom in July 1932 was months prior to the banking system going into its death spiral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-533000/comment-page-2/#comment-131063</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11939#comment-131063</guid>
		<description>Andy Tabbo Says: 

December 5th, 2008 at 12:29 pm 
Message to my fellow TBP folks who are short right now. If this market manages to start trading positive on the day after this data, then I would seriously consider exiting said short positions.

It’s still possible we could leg down to that 800 zone still, but it’s time for shorts to become aware of risks they currently face to the upside.

Seriously.

- AT

nice seeing, AT, better call~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy Tabbo Says: </p>
<p>December 5th, 2008 at 12:29 pm<br />
Message to my fellow TBP folks who are short right now. If this market manages to start trading positive on the day after this data, then I would seriously consider exiting said short positions.</p>
<p>It’s still possible we could leg down to that 800 zone still, but it’s time for shorts to become aware of risks they currently face to the upside.</p>
<p>Seriously.</p>
<p>- AT</p>
<p>nice seeing, AT, better call~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tranchefoot</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-533000/comment-page-2/#comment-131043</link>
		<dc:creator>tranchefoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11939#comment-131043</guid>
		<description>AT,

I also have been following your posts with a lot of interest.  I really appreciate you sharing your insights with the rest of us.  Can you recommend a source to begin learning elliot wave theory?  Thx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT,</p>
<p>I also have been following your posts with a lot of interest.  I really appreciate you sharing your insights with the rest of us.  Can you recommend a source to begin learning elliot wave theory?  Thx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Tabbo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-533000/comment-page-2/#comment-131038</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Tabbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11939#comment-131038</guid>
		<description>CPJ13.

No problems.  It was a nice intraday move.  Because I use leverage and I don&#039;t like holding positions over weekends I&#039;m out with SP500 at 865.  I&#039;m seeing intraday bearish RSI divergence at this point and I can see a sweet little five wave move on intraday charts.  So, I&#039;m sort of in neutral position.  Will look to buy back on any good little dips on Sunday or Monday.

- AT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPJ13.</p>
<p>No problems.  It was a nice intraday move.  Because I use leverage and I don&#8217;t like holding positions over weekends I&#8217;m out with SP500 at 865.  I&#8217;m seeing intraday bearish RSI divergence at this point and I can see a sweet little five wave move on intraday charts.  So, I&#8217;m sort of in neutral position.  Will look to buy back on any good little dips on Sunday or Monday.</p>
<p>- AT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPJ13</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-533000/comment-page-2/#comment-131019</link>
		<dc:creator>CPJ13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11939#comment-131019</guid>
		<description>@ Borchers: Good call.

@ AT: Please keep it coming, I appreciate your insight.

WTF today. I&#039;m bleeding bad. Don&#039;t know if I have the balls to take losses here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Borchers: Good call.</p>
<p>@ AT: Please keep it coming, I appreciate your insight.</p>
<p>WTF today. I&#8217;m bleeding bad. Don&#8217;t know if I have the balls to take losses here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broken</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-533000/comment-page-2/#comment-131012</link>
		<dc:creator>Broken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11939#comment-131012</guid>
		<description>The -533K employment loss number is, of course, BS.

MoM employment actually dropped 634K, but the magic seasonal adjustment erased 100K of that. Also, don&#039;t forget the inevitable 100K+ &quot;adjustment&quot; to the November numbers come December.

YoY, November is down 1.95 million, even including the +300K new Government jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The -533K employment loss number is, of course, BS.</p>
<p>MoM employment actually dropped 634K, but the magic seasonal adjustment erased 100K of that. Also, don&#8217;t forget the inevitable 100K+ &#8220;adjustment&#8221; to the November numbers come December.</p>
<p>YoY, November is down 1.95 million, even including the +300K new Government jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willid3</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-533000/comment-page-2/#comment-130999</link>
		<dc:creator>willid3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11939#comment-130999</guid>
		<description>i suspect we will see more bad news. we may get to 10-15 % unemployment (in U3 no less). and deflation will probably take hold and stay a while. we may get a big bounce when we do get a big stimulus, but if the business community doesn&#039;t pitch in, then it will be done again. and so far, they have done very little (at least since 2000 anyway but contribute to a big mess).   GDP may finally be a real number, and will be less 0 than for a year. and who knows, wall street may even like 5000 (or less).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i suspect we will see more bad news. we may get to 10-15 % unemployment (in U3 no less). and deflation will probably take hold and stay a while. we may get a big bounce when we do get a big stimulus, but if the business community doesn&#8217;t pitch in, then it will be done again. and so far, they have done very little (at least since 2000 anyway but contribute to a big mess).   GDP may finally be a real number, and will be less 0 than for a year. and who knows, wall street may even like 5000 (or less).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porsche87</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-533000/comment-page-2/#comment-130994</link>
		<dc:creator>Porsche87</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11939#comment-130994</guid>
		<description>What was the birth/death adjustment on today&#039;s numbers?  I&#039;ll bet things are worse than even this horrible number indicate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the birth/death adjustment on today&#8217;s numbers?  I&#8217;ll bet things are worse than even this horrible number indicate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

