<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NFP Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-preview-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-preview-2/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:58:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: donna</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-131005</link>
		<dc:creator>donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11909#comment-131005</guid>
		<description>Actually, October was revised to over 400K. It&#039;s much worse than we all think. And people are being laid off in December too, rather than hired on for Christmas.... 

January will be fugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, October was revised to over 400K. It&#8217;s much worse than we all think. And people are being laid off in December too, rather than hired on for Christmas&#8230;. </p>
<p>January will be fugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-130930</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11909#comment-130930</guid>
		<description>roger, 

ever hear of  &quot;Option ARM&quot; &#039;s ?

IOW: this &#039;fact&#039;: &quot;If you were right, than foreclosures wouldn’t be sky high in cities out west with relatively low unemployment.&quot;

doesn&#039;t support your conclusion: &quot;You are wrong, wrong, wrong on the walkaways being a small percentage of foreclosures.&quot;

do us a favor, prove with Data, preferably verifiable..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>roger, </p>
<p>ever hear of  &#8220;Option ARM&#8221; &#8216;s ?</p>
<p>IOW: this &#8216;fact&#8217;: &#8220;If you were right, than foreclosures wouldn’t be sky high in cities out west with relatively low unemployment.&#8221;</p>
<p>doesn&#8217;t support your conclusion: &#8220;You are wrong, wrong, wrong on the walkaways being a small percentage of foreclosures.&#8221;</p>
<p>do us a favor, prove with Data, preferably verifiable..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rogerdaily</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-130919</link>
		<dc:creator>rogerdaily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11909#comment-130919</guid>
		<description>Barry

You are wrong, wrong, wrong on the walkaways being a small percentage of foreclosures. 

If you were right, than foreclosures wouldn&#039;t be sky high in cities out west with relatively low unemployment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry</p>
<p>You are wrong, wrong, wrong on the walkaways being a small percentage of foreclosures. </p>
<p>If you were right, than foreclosures wouldn&#8217;t be sky high in cities out west with relatively low unemployment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wally</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-130885</link>
		<dc:creator>wally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11909#comment-130885</guid>
		<description>The time has come for &#039;mainstream&#039; economists in the US to admit they have no clue what their &#039;science&#039; is about... Benny B can go first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The time has come for &#8216;mainstream&#8217; economists in the US to admit they have no clue what their &#8216;science&#8217; is about&#8230; Benny B can go first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike j</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-130881</link>
		<dc:creator>mike j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11909#comment-130881</guid>
		<description>Wow.  Horrific.  -530 and add on another -80 to that for the October revision.  Ouch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Horrific.  -530 and add on another -80 to that for the October revision.  Ouch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfischer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-130880</link>
		<dc:creator>cfischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11909#comment-130880</guid>
		<description>Barry,

To me, it would be a calculated move. How far underwater I am versus what I consider my credit to be worth for the following decade. I value my credit fairly highly, but if I was 150-200k underwater, I&#039;d walk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry,</p>
<p>To me, it would be a calculated move. How far underwater I am versus what I consider my credit to be worth for the following decade. I value my credit fairly highly, but if I was 150-200k underwater, I&#8217;d walk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-130879</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11909#comment-130879</guid>
		<description>&quot;How can you say that Americans collectively have no savings?&quot;

roger, remember: Reading Is Fundamental.

LSS: he didn&#039;t, see your own quote of what he Did say.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/virtually
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/likely</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How can you say that Americans collectively have no savings?&#8221;</p>
<p>roger, remember: Reading Is Fundamental.</p>
<p>LSS: he didn&#8217;t, see your own quote of what he Did say.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/virtually" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefreedictionary.com/virtually</a><br />
<a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/likely" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefreedictionary.com/likely</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Ritholtz</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-130878</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Ritholtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11909#comment-130878</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see a percentage -- how many people voluntarily walk away versus those who are foreclosed upon?

The walkaways are a relatively small % . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see a percentage &#8212; how many people voluntarily walk away versus those who are foreclosed upon?</p>
<p>The walkaways are a relatively small % . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rogerdaily</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-130877</link>
		<dc:creator>rogerdaily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11909#comment-130877</guid>
		<description>Steve Barry - you say:

&quot;CNBC often hypes up the jobs number as being so critical…this time it is an understatement. Since Americans have virtually no savings, a single job loss will likely translate into a foreclosure if they own a home.&quot;

I don&#039;t care for CNBC but are you not the pot calling the kettle black here? 

How can you say that Americans collectively have no savings? I know two people who have been laid off and they both have plenty of savings. You must be a Chris Dodd democrat if you believe that foreclosures are solely caused by hardship. Plenty are caused by people CHOOSING to walk away due to no skin the in the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Barry &#8211; you say:</p>
<p>&#8220;CNBC often hypes up the jobs number as being so critical…this time it is an understatement. Since Americans have virtually no savings, a single job loss will likely translate into a foreclosure if they own a home.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care for CNBC but are you not the pot calling the kettle black here? </p>
<p>How can you say that Americans collectively have no savings? I know two people who have been laid off and they both have plenty of savings. You must be a Chris Dodd democrat if you believe that foreclosures are solely caused by hardship. Plenty are caused by people CHOOSING to walk away due to no skin the in the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rww</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/nfp-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-130876</link>
		<dc:creator>rww</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11909#comment-130876</guid>
		<description>BR, when do we see the end of the B-D adjustments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BR, when do we see the end of the B-D adjustments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

