<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Refinance Index Soars 203%; Purchase Index Rose 38%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/refinance-index-soars-203-purchase-index-rose-38/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/refinance-index-soars-203-purchase-index-rose-38/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:04:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jmborchers</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/refinance-index-soars-203-purchase-index-rose-38/comment-page-1/#comment-130653</link>
		<dc:creator>jmborchers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=11879#comment-130653</guid>
		<description>The long rate was the clincher. That seals the deal. My other clue is call options. Jan 2010 near the money only predicting a 10% rise rate per year. That&#039;s way too bearish considering the down turn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The long rate was the clincher. That seals the deal. My other clue is call options. Jan 2010 near the money only predicting a 10% rise rate per year. That&#8217;s way too bearish considering the down turn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
