<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You can&#8217;t win everyday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/you-cant-win-everyday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/you-cant-win-everyday/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vic</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/you-cant-win-everyday/comment-page-1/#comment-132281</link>
		<dc:creator>vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=12439#comment-132281</guid>
		<description>Why do you post Vince Farrel&#039;s writings on your blog? He is a laughing stock. The only person who has been more wrong than Vince Farrel is &lt;a href=&quot;http://cunningrealist.blogspot.com/2008/05/yeah-that-worked-out-well.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Don Luskin&lt;/a&gt;.

Remember Larry Kudlow talking about the &quot;Vince Farrell bottom&quot; in January. Then in March. Then in July. Then in October. One would think Mr Farrell would be sufficiently embarrassed by now that he wouldn&#039;t show his face on TV.

Sadly for some people, it doesn&#039;t matter how long they are wrong, or how egregiously they&#039;re wrong, they just keeping plugging away spouting their nonsense.

This average quality of posts decreases every time Vince is allowed to be a guest here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you post Vince Farrel&#8217;s writings on your blog? He is a laughing stock. The only person who has been more wrong than Vince Farrel is <a href="http://cunningrealist.blogspot.com/2008/05/yeah-that-worked-out-well.html" rel="nofollow">Don Luskin</a>.</p>
<p>Remember Larry Kudlow talking about the &#8220;Vince Farrell bottom&#8221; in January. Then in March. Then in July. Then in October. One would think Mr Farrell would be sufficiently embarrassed by now that he wouldn&#8217;t show his face on TV.</p>
<p>Sadly for some people, it doesn&#8217;t matter how long they are wrong, or how egregiously they&#8217;re wrong, they just keeping plugging away spouting their nonsense.</p>
<p>This average quality of posts decreases every time Vince is allowed to be a guest here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Bailor of Calif</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/you-cant-win-everyday/comment-page-1/#comment-132226</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Bailor of Calif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=12439#comment-132226</guid>
		<description>Vince,  Great  job cheerleading along with sue and all the other lemings and cnbc.  Wait till earnings get revised.  Thats when we will get the next leg down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince,  Great  job cheerleading along with sue and all the other lemings and cnbc.  Wait till earnings get revised.  Thats when we will get the next leg down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/you-cant-win-everyday/comment-page-1/#comment-132126</link>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=12439#comment-132126</guid>
		<description>&quot;t-bills at zero? I’d not have thought so in my lifetime…&quot;

Bruce, in a fiat world, you are only limited by your imagination...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;t-bills at zero? I’d not have thought so in my lifetime…&#8221;</p>
<p>Bruce, in a fiat world, you are only limited by your imagination&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/you-cant-win-everyday/comment-page-1/#comment-132070</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=12439#comment-132070</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be more succinct: This guy&#039;s missives need to be filed under the &#039;disinfo/agitprop&#039;-tab of TBP 1.1..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be more succinct: This guy&#8217;s missives need to be filed under the &#8216;disinfo/agitprop&#8217;-tab of TBP 1.1..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce in Tn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/you-cant-win-everyday/comment-page-1/#comment-132069</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce in Tn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=12439#comment-132069</guid>
		<description>Vince, what I dislike about your visits to CNBC are summed up in the last few words of your statement. &quot;But we&#039;ll be flying blind for a bit yet.&quot;

Yet, your statements on tv are uniformily bullish, without exception.  I am not sure if your job depends on your presentation of this point of view, but even goofy old Jim Cramer can change his mind, and at least has earned my respect for that.

Vince, you seem like a one note pony.  Most of us here see that this recession is different, in that it is a worldwide deleveraging of a common error, and that in itself is unusual.  The global, temporal nature of the downturn is also unusual, and to this point people who have been cautious have done much better than those who&#039;ve not been.

I am including something for you to watch the next few days if you think this is over.

http://www.rttnews.com/CorpInfo/EconomicCalendar.aspx

Just wanted you to know it may be different this time...t-bills at zero?  I&#039;d not have thought so in my lifetime...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince, what I dislike about your visits to CNBC are summed up in the last few words of your statement. &#8220;But we&#8217;ll be flying blind for a bit yet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yet, your statements on tv are uniformily bullish, without exception.  I am not sure if your job depends on your presentation of this point of view, but even goofy old Jim Cramer can change his mind, and at least has earned my respect for that.</p>
<p>Vince, you seem like a one note pony.  Most of us here see that this recession is different, in that it is a worldwide deleveraging of a common error, and that in itself is unusual.  The global, temporal nature of the downturn is also unusual, and to this point people who have been cautious have done much better than those who&#8217;ve not been.</p>
<p>I am including something for you to watch the next few days if you think this is over.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rttnews.com/CorpInfo/EconomicCalendar.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.rttnews.com/CorpInfo/EconomicCalendar.aspx</a></p>
<p>Just wanted you to know it may be different this time&#8230;t-bills at zero?  I&#8217;d not have thought so in my lifetime&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

