<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 CPI = 3.8% or 0.1% ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/2008-cpi-38-or-01/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/2008-cpi-38-or-01/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:01:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: danm</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/2008-cpi-38-or-01/comment-page-1/#comment-140266</link>
		<dc:creator>danm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16746#comment-140266</guid>
		<description>Weighting of medical costs in CPI calculations: NEGLIGIBLE.
------------------
Do they put 1, 2, 3 or 4 cars in the US calculation of CPI?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weighting of medical costs in CPI calculations: NEGLIGIBLE.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Do they put 1, 2, 3 or 4 cars in the US calculation of CPI?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danm</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/2008-cpi-38-or-01/comment-page-1/#comment-140265</link>
		<dc:creator>danm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16746#comment-140265</guid>
		<description>Deflation in assets and useless stuff
Inflation in essentials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deflation in assets and useless stuff<br />
Inflation in essentials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danm</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/2008-cpi-38-or-01/comment-page-1/#comment-140264</link>
		<dc:creator>danm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16746#comment-140264</guid>
		<description>Interviewed a few PMs last week.  Asked them if, on the institutional side, talks were of deflation or inflation and thay ALL gave me a puzzled look.

Talks are of pension underfunding, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interviewed a few PMs last week.  Asked them if, on the institutional side, talks were of deflation or inflation and thay ALL gave me a puzzled look.</p>
<p>Talks are of pension underfunding, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben22</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/2008-cpi-38-or-01/comment-page-1/#comment-140250</link>
		<dc:creator>ben22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16746#comment-140250</guid>
		<description>fellas, 

I know you are upset about medical costs, as we all should be, but my comment was meant to be taken as a joke.  Was that not clear??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fellas, </p>
<p>I know you are upset about medical costs, as we all should be, but my comment was meant to be taken as a joke.  Was that not clear??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mannwich</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/2008-cpi-38-or-01/comment-page-1/#comment-140240</link>
		<dc:creator>Mannwich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16746#comment-140240</guid>
		<description>@Thisson:  There&#039;s still inflation in food but deflation in just about everything else.......for the time being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Thisson:  There&#8217;s still inflation in food but deflation in just about everything else&#8230;&#8230;.for the time being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thisson</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/2008-cpi-38-or-01/comment-page-1/#comment-140225</link>
		<dc:creator>Thisson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16746#comment-140225</guid>
		<description>Out in the streets of Manhattan, I&#039;m seeing inflation, not deflation.

The chinese place where I get lunch raised its prices last week. 
When I asked the coffee vendor that sells me  my morning  coffee + chocolate chip muffin whether she&#039;s seeing inflation or deflation, she told me she had been fighting with her donut supplier because although the price of flour has gone down 50%, the donut supplier is raising prices.  She said her napkins, paper cups, and all other supplies are also going up in prices.

I *do* see price decreases when it comes to staple clothing items (retailers know there&#039;s a shakeout in the works), but I don&#039;t see price declines elsewhere.

So is deflation fact or fiction?  I&#039;m in the camp that thinks massive inflation is inevitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out in the streets of Manhattan, I&#8217;m seeing inflation, not deflation.</p>
<p>The chinese place where I get lunch raised its prices last week.<br />
When I asked the coffee vendor that sells me  my morning  coffee + chocolate chip muffin whether she&#8217;s seeing inflation or deflation, she told me she had been fighting with her donut supplier because although the price of flour has gone down 50%, the donut supplier is raising prices.  She said her napkins, paper cups, and all other supplies are also going up in prices.</p>
<p>I *do* see price decreases when it comes to staple clothing items (retailers know there&#8217;s a shakeout in the works), but I don&#8217;t see price declines elsewhere.</p>
<p>So is deflation fact or fiction?  I&#8217;m in the camp that thinks massive inflation is inevitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stantam</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/2008-cpi-38-or-01/comment-page-1/#comment-140211</link>
		<dc:creator>stantam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16746#comment-140211</guid>
		<description>DEDUCTIONS??? My farking Ar$e. Those living off of SS and other modest, sometimes meager supplements, unless they die a quick death, are destined to be destitute. As my friend Walt Kelly of Pogo fame put it... (paraphrase/modification) let&#039;s see, deduct 100,000 of medical bills from zer0 tax liability and I still owe 100,000.  Yikes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DEDUCTIONS??? My farking Ar$e. Those living off of SS and other modest, sometimes meager supplements, unless they die a quick death, are destined to be destitute. As my friend Walt Kelly of Pogo fame put it&#8230; (paraphrase/modification) let&#8217;s see, deduct 100,000 of medical bills from zer0 tax liability and I still owe 100,000.  Yikes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AGG</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/2008-cpi-38-or-01/comment-page-1/#comment-140204</link>
		<dc:creator>AGG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16746#comment-140204</guid>
		<description>ben22,
When &quot;deductions&quot; mean a dollar for dollar reduction of taxes, then we can look at &quot;deductible&quot; expenses as truly deductible. Why should my medical expenses be on a par with new flat panel displays for a business? Our system is crooked. I hope Daschle carves the insurance companies a new asshole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ben22,<br />
When &#8220;deductions&#8221; mean a dollar for dollar reduction of taxes, then we can look at &#8220;deductible&#8221; expenses as truly deductible. Why should my medical expenses be on a par with new flat panel displays for a business? Our system is crooked. I hope Daschle carves the insurance companies a new asshole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben22</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/2008-cpi-38-or-01/comment-page-1/#comment-140199</link>
		<dc:creator>ben22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16746#comment-140199</guid>
		<description>AGG, 

Look on the bright side, if your costs are a high enough % of AGI you can deduct them.... 

I&#039;m Erin Burnett, I just painted a silver lining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AGG, </p>
<p>Look on the bright side, if your costs are a high enough % of AGI you can deduct them&#8230;. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m Erin Burnett, I just painted a silver lining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AGG</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/2008-cpi-38-or-01/comment-page-1/#comment-140195</link>
		<dc:creator>AGG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16746#comment-140195</guid>
		<description>NUMBER ONE CAUSE OF BANKRUPCY IN THE USA:  medical costs,
Weighting of medical costs in CPI  calculations:  NEGLIGIBLE.
Consequently it&#039;s all a bunch of mendacity.
Enjoy your health while you have it. When it&#039;s gone, if you&#039;re not rich in our  &quot;for profit medicine&quot;  society, you will soon be destitute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NUMBER ONE CAUSE OF BANKRUPCY IN THE USA:  medical costs,<br />
Weighting of medical costs in CPI  calculations:  NEGLIGIBLE.<br />
Consequently it&#8217;s all a bunch of mendacity.<br />
Enjoy your health while you have it. When it&#8217;s gone, if you&#8217;re not rich in our  &#8220;for profit medicine&#8221;  society, you will soon be destitute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

