<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bernanke: I&#8217;m All In</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/bernanke-im-all-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/bernanke-im-all-in/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:36:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: constantnormal</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/bernanke-im-all-in/comment-page-1/#comment-139065</link>
		<dc:creator>constantnormal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15962#comment-139065</guid>
		<description>• Coordinated action between Congress, Treasury and the Federal Reserve

   &lt;i&gt;don&#039;t make me laugh.&lt;/i&gt;

• Undertaking additional steps to rescue “Financial firms whose failure would pose a systemic risk”

   &lt;i&gt;what about those financial firms whose &lt;b&gt;survival&lt;/b&gt; would pose a systemic risk?&lt;/i&gt;

• Supported “close regulatory scrutiny” of firms that engage in “risk-taking”

   &lt;i&gt;does this include those aforementioned &quot;financial firms&quot;, or just the short-sellers trying to stay alive in a sinking market?&lt;/i&gt;

•Creating a “regulatory procedure for resolving a large, failing nonbank institution”

   &lt;i&gt;I thought that was called &quot;bankruptcy&quot; -- or is that now obsolete in the realm of TBTF?&lt;/i&gt;

•Continued bolstering of credit for both consumers and businesses.

   &lt;i&gt;streamline the process, just send out bales of newly-printed money.  The inflation will take care of the repayment issues.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>• Coordinated action between Congress, Treasury and the Federal Reserve</p>
<p>   <i>don&#8217;t make me laugh.</i></p>
<p>• Undertaking additional steps to rescue “Financial firms whose failure would pose a systemic risk”</p>
<p>   <i>what about those financial firms whose <b>survival</b> would pose a systemic risk?</i></p>
<p>• Supported “close regulatory scrutiny” of firms that engage in “risk-taking”</p>
<p>   <i>does this include those aforementioned &#8220;financial firms&#8221;, or just the short-sellers trying to stay alive in a sinking market?</i></p>
<p>•Creating a “regulatory procedure for resolving a large, failing nonbank institution”</p>
<p>   <i>I thought that was called &#8220;bankruptcy&#8221; &#8212; or is that now obsolete in the realm of TBTF?</i></p>
<p>•Continued bolstering of credit for both consumers and businesses.</p>
<p>   <i>streamline the process, just send out bales of newly-printed money.  The inflation will take care of the repayment issues.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbailey</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/bernanke-im-all-in/comment-page-1/#comment-138854</link>
		<dc:creator>sbailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15962#comment-138854</guid>
		<description>Maybe if he was really all in he&#039;d start closing down some banks instead of propping them up.  Sigh.  A guy can dream, can&#039;t he?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe if he was really all in he&#8217;d start closing down some banks instead of propping them up.  Sigh.  A guy can dream, can&#8217;t he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hr</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/bernanke-im-all-in/comment-page-1/#comment-138847</link>
		<dc:creator>hr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15962#comment-138847</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s address these one at a time (so many questions):

• Coordinated action between Congress, Treasury and the Federal Reserve

Separation of powers anyone? Collusion? Oversight by anyone, anyone? Either way, has it helped so far?

• Undertaking additional steps to rescue “Financial firms whose failure would pose a systemic risk”

Free market? We now have an elitocracy. Who decides which financial firms? Was Bear Stearns hated, and unsupported? Was allowing Lehman to fail just a mistake, or on purpose? Why would we let anyone get so big as to even pose a systemic risk? Yet ever larger mergers are still the solution, still. Is anyone affiliated with Goldman at the head of the line for bailouts? Any frat buddies of the current Treasury secretary getting special treatment, whoever the secretary is??

• Supported “close regulatory scrutiny” of firms that engage in “risk-taking”

Horse out of the barn, better than nothing. Prosecution, anyone? Other than Madoff, who else is under investigation for fraud? What is risk taking? Whose opinion? Cutting off the animal spirits of economic growth?

•Creating a “regulatory procedure for resolving a large, failing nonbank institution”

The Fed has control of this area (nonbanks)? What is large? Insured by whom? 

•Continued bolstering of credit for both consumers and businesses.

Oh, I get it. Loose credit caused the excess stimulation/overleveraging. Bolstering credit will fix the problem. The cause of the prior problem is the current solution. Is Greenspan still on the job? Any lessons learned yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s address these one at a time (so many questions):</p>
<p>• Coordinated action between Congress, Treasury and the Federal Reserve</p>
<p>Separation of powers anyone? Collusion? Oversight by anyone, anyone? Either way, has it helped so far?</p>
<p>• Undertaking additional steps to rescue “Financial firms whose failure would pose a systemic risk”</p>
<p>Free market? We now have an elitocracy. Who decides which financial firms? Was Bear Stearns hated, and unsupported? Was allowing Lehman to fail just a mistake, or on purpose? Why would we let anyone get so big as to even pose a systemic risk? Yet ever larger mergers are still the solution, still. Is anyone affiliated with Goldman at the head of the line for bailouts? Any frat buddies of the current Treasury secretary getting special treatment, whoever the secretary is??</p>
<p>• Supported “close regulatory scrutiny” of firms that engage in “risk-taking”</p>
<p>Horse out of the barn, better than nothing. Prosecution, anyone? Other than Madoff, who else is under investigation for fraud? What is risk taking? Whose opinion? Cutting off the animal spirits of economic growth?</p>
<p>•Creating a “regulatory procedure for resolving a large, failing nonbank institution”</p>
<p>The Fed has control of this area (nonbanks)? What is large? Insured by whom? </p>
<p>•Continued bolstering of credit for both consumers and businesses.</p>
<p>Oh, I get it. Loose credit caused the excess stimulation/overleveraging. Bolstering credit will fix the problem. The cause of the prior problem is the current solution. Is Greenspan still on the job? Any lessons learned yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce N Tennessee</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/bernanke-im-all-in/comment-page-1/#comment-138776</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce N Tennessee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15962#comment-138776</guid>
		<description>Well, we wuz right about the budget deficit:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Treasury-deficit-hits-new-apf-14049804.html

Treasury: deficit hits new record in just 3 months
Treasury: federal deficit already totals record $485 billion in first 3 months of budget year 

Yes, fans of the amazing disappearing economy...the budget deficit for the first three month of the fiscal year is larger than the entire 2008 deficit.

See what you can do when you really put your mind to it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we wuz right about the budget deficit:</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Treasury-deficit-hits-new-apf-14049804.html" rel="nofollow">http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Treasury-deficit-hits-new-apf-14049804.html</a></p>
<p>Treasury: deficit hits new record in just 3 months<br />
Treasury: federal deficit already totals record $485 billion in first 3 months of budget year </p>
<p>Yes, fans of the amazing disappearing economy&#8230;the budget deficit for the first three month of the fiscal year is larger than the entire 2008 deficit.</p>
<p>See what you can do when you really put your mind to it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lugnut</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/bernanke-im-all-in/comment-page-1/#comment-138768</link>
		<dc:creator>Lugnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15962#comment-138768</guid>
		<description>Somehow this half hazard dispensation of taxpayer debt will magically help shore up these failed organizations posing all of this systematic risk. 

Will the electronic transfer of these funds somehow fix all of their bad investment decisions, fire the bad managers and replace them with competent ones, and allow of the bad debt and assets to be realized instead of put o life support. 

Money that will be needed to help weather the coming storm will instead be wasted on useless politically motivated wishful thinking. We we really need it down the road, we will have a bankrupt taxpayer base saddled with trillions intax debt obligations and a fed and treasury with little capacity to create new capital as the world CBs will no longer be coming to the auction table for another helping of Ts

insert golf clap here.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow this half hazard dispensation of taxpayer debt will magically help shore up these failed organizations posing all of this systematic risk. </p>
<p>Will the electronic transfer of these funds somehow fix all of their bad investment decisions, fire the bad managers and replace them with competent ones, and allow of the bad debt and assets to be realized instead of put o life support. </p>
<p>Money that will be needed to help weather the coming storm will instead be wasted on useless politically motivated wishful thinking. We we really need it down the road, we will have a bankrupt taxpayer base saddled with trillions intax debt obligations and a fed and treasury with little capacity to create new capital as the world CBs will no longer be coming to the auction table for another helping of Ts</p>
<p>insert golf clap here&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce N Tennessee</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/bernanke-im-all-in/comment-page-1/#comment-138765</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce N Tennessee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15962#comment-138765</guid>
		<description>Well, we won&#039;t get a pony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we won&#8217;t get a pony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Neid</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/bernanke-im-all-in/comment-page-1/#comment-138761</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Neid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15962#comment-138761</guid>
		<description>He recognizes the need for a plan (of any sort)......

Too funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He recognizes the need for a plan (of any sort)&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Too funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcasey</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/bernanke-im-all-in/comment-page-1/#comment-138756</link>
		<dc:creator>bcasey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15962#comment-138756</guid>
		<description>Will we get heads then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will we get heads then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce N Tennessee</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/bernanke-im-all-in/comment-page-1/#comment-138755</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce N Tennessee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15962#comment-138755</guid>
		<description>Still in the Ready, Fire, Aim mode of crisis management.

I think by the end of the summer, we&#039;ll all recognize this time for what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still in the Ready, Fire, Aim mode of crisis management.</p>
<p>I think by the end of the summer, we&#8217;ll all recognize this time for what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GloomBoom</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/bernanke-im-all-in/comment-page-1/#comment-138752</link>
		<dc:creator>GloomBoom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15962#comment-138752</guid>
		<description>This is getting really frightening. After all they have already done, Ben still wants to drop more Benjamins on the economy. It must be much worse than anybody realizes to still have such a gung ho approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is getting really frightening. After all they have already done, Ben still wants to drop more Benjamins on the economy. It must be much worse than anybody realizes to still have such a gung ho approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
