<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Labor Force Participation Rate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/labor-force-participation-rate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/labor-force-participation-rate/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddk</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/labor-force-participation-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-138792</link>
		<dc:creator>ddk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15922#comment-138792</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, the bottoms on the chart never seem to have had much evidence of &quot;approaching bottom.&quot; They bottomed somewhat abruptly. So the current vertical drop is dire, but may not be predictive of how far further we have to go.

End devil&#039;s advocate note: yeah, we have far further to go. I just find this chart more reassuring than anything, since it shows abrupt reversals are possible. In past decades. In other circumstances. Whimper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, the bottoms on the chart never seem to have had much evidence of &#8220;approaching bottom.&#8221; They bottomed somewhat abruptly. So the current vertical drop is dire, but may not be predictive of how far further we have to go.</p>
<p>End devil&#8217;s advocate note: yeah, we have far further to go. I just find this chart more reassuring than anything, since it shows abrupt reversals are possible. In past decades. In other circumstances. Whimper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike_mccarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/labor-force-participation-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-138774</link>
		<dc:creator>mike_mccarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15922#comment-138774</guid>
		<description>BR,

Thanks for posting this.  The title of the chart should be Employment:Population ratio though.  Labor Force Participation Rate is a different category from BLS that still has the &quot;Labor Force&quot; fudge factor, while Employment:Population Ratio is free of the fudge.   I don&#039;t want to anger the real economists by mislabeling things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BR,</p>
<p>Thanks for posting this.  The title of the chart should be Employment:Population ratio though.  Labor Force Participation Rate is a different category from BLS that still has the &#8220;Labor Force&#8221; fudge factor, while Employment:Population Ratio is free of the fudge.   I don&#8217;t want to anger the real economists by mislabeling things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce N Tennessee</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/labor-force-participation-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-138770</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce N Tennessee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15922#comment-138770</guid>
		<description>Barry,

Love your blog.  The people here seem less sarcastic, and certainly less cynical than some other sites.  I will say, that as this thing has played out, I think I am coming down on the side of the fence that this is the beginning of a new depression.  Having never experienced such a thing, I hope I am wrong.  But I have lived through at least three pretty good recessions, and done well each time.  I think it is different this time...I&#039;ll give you a few thoughts.

First, the speed and global uniformity of the downturn is the one most alarming element here.  In spite of the fact that central banks are doing all in their power to stop this, the consumer and business are continuing what I think is best described as deleveraging.  But in the end the deleveraging on this massive a scale, I think, brings us to depression.  There is a term in physics called momentum.  I think this downturn has it in spades...

Second, the salt mine is pretty insulated against recessions.  But the people I talk with daily are really scared this time, and I am seeing jobs disappear now (for the last 2 months) that I would have thought were bullet-proof.  They are not.  We have an enormous number of job applicants for jobs here.  Many, many more than one year ago.

I live in a retirement area.  Builders are gone.  Gone.  Auctions of property are now commonplace, and this is only in the last 12 months.  

People in my children&#039;s immediate in-law family, who have always had plenty and made plenty, are now seeing the writing on the wall.  Honestly.

My wife, who I review the economic news overnight with every morning for a few minutes before heading the the mine, has been convinced for 6 months this was a depression.  I pooh-poohed this until just recently.  Not anymore.

Let&#039;s hope I&#039;m wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry,</p>
<p>Love your blog.  The people here seem less sarcastic, and certainly less cynical than some other sites.  I will say, that as this thing has played out, I think I am coming down on the side of the fence that this is the beginning of a new depression.  Having never experienced such a thing, I hope I am wrong.  But I have lived through at least three pretty good recessions, and done well each time.  I think it is different this time&#8230;I&#8217;ll give you a few thoughts.</p>
<p>First, the speed and global uniformity of the downturn is the one most alarming element here.  In spite of the fact that central banks are doing all in their power to stop this, the consumer and business are continuing what I think is best described as deleveraging.  But in the end the deleveraging on this massive a scale, I think, brings us to depression.  There is a term in physics called momentum.  I think this downturn has it in spades&#8230;</p>
<p>Second, the salt mine is pretty insulated against recessions.  But the people I talk with daily are really scared this time, and I am seeing jobs disappear now (for the last 2 months) that I would have thought were bullet-proof.  They are not.  We have an enormous number of job applicants for jobs here.  Many, many more than one year ago.</p>
<p>I live in a retirement area.  Builders are gone.  Gone.  Auctions of property are now commonplace, and this is only in the last 12 months.  </p>
<p>People in my children&#8217;s immediate in-law family, who have always had plenty and made plenty, are now seeing the writing on the wall.  Honestly.</p>
<p>My wife, who I review the economic news overnight with every morning for a few minutes before heading the the mine, has been convinced for 6 months this was a depression.  I pooh-poohed this until just recently.  Not anymore.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Ritholtz</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/labor-force-participation-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-138760</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Ritholtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15922#comment-138760</guid>
		<description>We addressed this yesterday:

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/unemployment-rate/

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/comparing-unemployment-rates-across-eras/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We addressed this yesterday:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/unemployment-rate/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/unemployment-rate/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/comparing-unemployment-rates-across-eras/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/comparing-unemployment-rates-across-eras/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dow</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/labor-force-participation-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-138732</link>
		<dc:creator>Dow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15922#comment-138732</guid>
		<description>Do you still believe the shadowstat of 17.5% unemployment is unrealistic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you still believe the shadowstat of 17.5% unemployment is unrealistic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

