<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oath of Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/oath-of-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/oath-of-office/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:29:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How the Common Man Sees It</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/oath-of-office/comment-page-1/#comment-141191</link>
		<dc:creator>How the Common Man Sees It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16955#comment-141191</guid>
		<description>I was just reflecting a bit.

I&#039;ll bet Hillary Clinton&#039;s goals for 2009 didn&#039;t include being secretary for a black man  :mrgreen:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just reflecting a bit.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll bet Hillary Clinton&#8217;s goals for 2009 didn&#8217;t include being secretary for a black man  :mrgreen:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Nola</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/oath-of-office/comment-page-1/#comment-140857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Nola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16955#comment-140857</guid>
		<description>Re: insider buys

Would be deliciously ironic if Obama decides to do what needs to be done and wipes out the shareholders in a takeover a la RTC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: insider buys</p>
<p>Would be deliciously ironic if Obama decides to do what needs to be done and wipes out the shareholders in a takeover a la RTC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/oath-of-office/comment-page-1/#comment-140847</link>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16955#comment-140847</guid>
		<description>AT, normally i would agree with you, and voiced the same thing the last time Barron&#039;s was touting insider buys.  This time it&#039;s different : )  

On another note, the Obama Administration hit the ground running today.  It&#039;s going to get exciting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT, normally i would agree with you, and voiced the same thing the last time Barron&#8217;s was touting insider buys.  This time it&#8217;s different : )  </p>
<p>On another note, the Obama Administration hit the ground running today.  It&#8217;s going to get exciting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mannwich</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/oath-of-office/comment-page-1/#comment-140839</link>
		<dc:creator>Mannwich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16955#comment-140839</guid>
		<description>@AndrewShaw:  Macke is probably the best one on &quot;Fast Money&quot; but I&#039;m not him.  He is originally from MN, I believe though.  Not nearly as wealthy as he is, unfortunately.  Good to hear you got out in time.  Those ETF&#039;s can be a fun or hellish ride, depending on how/where you catch them.  I&#039;ve been on both ends over the past year and seem to be mostly running in place as a result.  Better than losing money, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AndrewShaw:  Macke is probably the best one on &#8220;Fast Money&#8221; but I&#8217;m not him.  He is originally from MN, I believe though.  Not nearly as wealthy as he is, unfortunately.  Good to hear you got out in time.  Those ETF&#8217;s can be a fun or hellish ride, depending on how/where you catch them.  I&#8217;ve been on both ends over the past year and seem to be mostly running in place as a result.  Better than losing money, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewShaw</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/oath-of-office/comment-page-1/#comment-140838</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewShaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16955#comment-140838</guid>
		<description>JDAMON:  got  10k in way-in-the-money calls on xlf, half February/half  into summer, up 10% today on those, thanks Borchers.     Cynical play, financials will be toast, just not this week.  Probably will give me huge gains that will all be lost on a gap-open on nationalization day.

MANNWICH:  Got out of SKF/FAZ when the dip happened today, those got ugly later, whoa.  I kept thinking about your advice all night, just got damn lucky to get out.   Mannwich, I always thought you were actually Jeff Macke, when you used the JeffM handle, but the constant MN references rule it out I suppose.  You guys think alike, its really strange.  Am I right?

GE still has to cut its dividend.  Wish I didn&#039;t own that wonderful &quot;blue chip&quot; at 25.  But then again, not wrong, just early, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JDAMON:  got  10k in way-in-the-money calls on xlf, half February/half  into summer, up 10% today on those, thanks Borchers.     Cynical play, financials will be toast, just not this week.  Probably will give me huge gains that will all be lost on a gap-open on nationalization day.</p>
<p>MANNWICH:  Got out of SKF/FAZ when the dip happened today, those got ugly later, whoa.  I kept thinking about your advice all night, just got damn lucky to get out.   Mannwich, I always thought you were actually Jeff Macke, when you used the JeffM handle, but the constant MN references rule it out I suppose.  You guys think alike, its really strange.  Am I right?</p>
<p>GE still has to cut its dividend.  Wish I didn&#8217;t own that wonderful &#8220;blue chip&#8221; at 25.  But then again, not wrong, just early, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jdamon33</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/oath-of-office/comment-page-1/#comment-140833</link>
		<dc:creator>Jdamon33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16955#comment-140833</guid>
		<description>O/T, but it looks like I may finally make some money on my WFC trade today.  Had to buy  when it went below $14.00 today.  won&#039;t sell my 2,000 shares until it hits $28.00.  

I think JPM, WFC, Goldman all survive without having to be &quot;nationalized&quot;.  BAC and C, not so sure they won&#039;t be nationalized.

Anyone nibbling on financials at these levels?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O/T, but it looks like I may finally make some money on my WFC trade today.  Had to buy  when it went below $14.00 today.  won&#8217;t sell my 2,000 shares until it hits $28.00.  </p>
<p>I think JPM, WFC, Goldman all survive without having to be &#8220;nationalized&#8221;.  BAC and C, not so sure they won&#8217;t be nationalized.</p>
<p>Anyone nibbling on financials at these levels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rightline</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/oath-of-office/comment-page-1/#comment-140830</link>
		<dc:creator>Rightline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16955#comment-140830</guid>
		<description>I have to say Obama is thorough.  I&#039;ll take it as a good sign.   I just saw a blurb that said he retook the oath of office to ensure there could be no questions later due to Roberts flub.

On these execs buying stock in their companies.  I&#039;ll speculate that it is a feeble attempt to pump/show confidence right in front of a major capital raising dilution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say Obama is thorough.  I&#8217;ll take it as a good sign.   I just saw a blurb that said he retook the oath of office to ensure there could be no questions later due to Roberts flub.</p>
<p>On these execs buying stock in their companies.  I&#8217;ll speculate that it is a feeble attempt to pump/show confidence right in front of a major capital raising dilution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Tabbo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/oath-of-office/comment-page-1/#comment-140825</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Tabbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16955#comment-140825</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t Jeff Immelt buy a bunch of GE stock a long, long time ago?

Wasn&#039;t Aubrey McClendon, at Chesapeake, taken out on a stretcher at 12 bucks on Chesapeake after buying boatloads at WAAAAAy higher levels.  Remember how Pete Najarin kept pumping Chesapeake stock last year &quot;because the CEO keeps buying.&quot;  What a joke.

These CEO&#039;s are not very good traders....let me assure of you that much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Jeff Immelt buy a bunch of GE stock a long, long time ago?</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t Aubrey McClendon, at Chesapeake, taken out on a stretcher at 12 bucks on Chesapeake after buying boatloads at WAAAAAy higher levels.  Remember how Pete Najarin kept pumping Chesapeake stock last year &#8220;because the CEO keeps buying.&#8221;  What a joke.</p>
<p>These CEO&#8217;s are not very good traders&#8230;.let me assure of you that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 cc</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/oath-of-office/comment-page-1/#comment-140821</link>
		<dc:creator>10 cc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16955#comment-140821</guid>
		<description>The  &quot;oath of office&quot; is basically just a promise to uphold our Constitution.  It obviously had no impact on Bush/Cheney and company.  It certainly does not appear to hold any legal standing.  After Bush, they may as well have just changed it to something like ...&quot;Still wanna be president&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The  &#8220;oath of office&#8221; is basically just a promise to uphold our Constitution.  It obviously had no impact on Bush/Cheney and company.  It certainly does not appear to hold any legal standing.  After Bush, they may as well have just changed it to something like &#8230;&#8221;Still wanna be president&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AGG</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/oath-of-office/comment-page-1/#comment-140815</link>
		<dc:creator>AGG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=16955#comment-140815</guid>
		<description>Hey I&#039;m the one that came up with the airbus in the water economy metaphor! Check my post from the day of the splash.
Pilot and crew                                                                         = Obama administration.
Senator Cornhole from Texas and other reptilians = GEESE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I&#8217;m the one that came up with the airbus in the water economy metaphor! Check my post from the day of the splash.<br />
Pilot and crew                                                                         = Obama administration.<br />
Senator Cornhole from Texas and other reptilians = GEESE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

