<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;PAULSON&#8217;S GIFT&#8221; ; A Review of the Bailout &#8212; What is to be Done Now??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/paulsons-gift-a-review-of-the-bailout-what-is-to-be-done-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/paulsons-gift-a-review-of-the-bailout-what-is-to-be-done-now/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:33:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: murph</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/paulsons-gift-a-review-of-the-bailout-what-is-to-be-done-now/comment-page-1/#comment-138220</link>
		<dc:creator>murph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15400#comment-138220</guid>
		<description>While I could certainly believe that these ten banks would be major players in the CDS market, I&#039;d be hard pressed to believe that there aren&#039;t dozens of other entities just as eager to buy into CDS&#039;s.

I just can&#039;t believe that all the other selfish financial types add up to a meager 3% of the CDS market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I could certainly believe that these ten banks would be major players in the CDS market, I&#8217;d be hard pressed to believe that there aren&#8217;t dozens of other entities just as eager to buy into CDS&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I just can&#8217;t believe that all the other selfish financial types add up to a meager 3% of the CDS market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gloppie</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/paulsons-gift-a-review-of-the-bailout-what-is-to-be-done-now/comment-page-1/#comment-138146</link>
		<dc:creator>gloppie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15400#comment-138146</guid>
		<description>@Murph,
I do not have factual evidence for this, but it seems rather obvious that the Credit Default Swap players would be the same bunch of most over leveraged, risk-taking, me first ya&#039;ll later crooks wouldn&#039;t it ? 
There is a French saying...Apres moi, les mouches. &quot;After me, the flies&quot;. Utter contempt and selfishness, when I&#039;m gone all that is left is rotten and useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Murph,<br />
I do not have factual evidence for this, but it seems rather obvious that the Credit Default Swap players would be the same bunch of most over leveraged, risk-taking, me first ya&#8217;ll later crooks wouldn&#8217;t it ?<br />
There is a French saying&#8230;Apres moi, les mouches. &#8220;After me, the flies&#8221;. Utter contempt and selfishness, when I&#8217;m gone all that is left is rotten and useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: murph</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/paulsons-gift-a-review-of-the-bailout-what-is-to-be-done-now/comment-page-1/#comment-138057</link>
		<dc:creator>murph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15400#comment-138057</guid>
		<description>Minor questions on the Paulson&#039;s Gift paper.

On page 10 - they are saying that the CDS liabilities of the ten big banks (that received federal cash injections) will not affect their overall conclusions because &quot;as reported by the Controller of the Currency, 97% [of the CDS&#039;s] are held by these [same banks].&quot;

Two questions:
1) I thought that CDS&#039;s were not disclosed to outside parties (part of the reason the banks were so unsure about who was solvent) - has the Controller of the Currency been compiling a true list of the existing CDS liabilities out there? If they weren&#039;t in the past, are they now?

2) Is it really possible that 97% of the CDS market is in the hands of ten banks?  Is the Controller of the Currency&#039;s listing a sub-set of the domestic CDS market?

Baffled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minor questions on the Paulson&#8217;s Gift paper.</p>
<p>On page 10 &#8211; they are saying that the CDS liabilities of the ten big banks (that received federal cash injections) will not affect their overall conclusions because &#8220;as reported by the Controller of the Currency, 97% [of the CDS's] are held by these [same banks].&#8221;</p>
<p>Two questions:<br />
1) I thought that CDS&#8217;s were not disclosed to outside parties (part of the reason the banks were so unsure about who was solvent) &#8211; has the Controller of the Currency been compiling a true list of the existing CDS liabilities out there? If they weren&#8217;t in the past, are they now?</p>
<p>2) Is it really possible that 97% of the CDS market is in the hands of ten banks?  Is the Controller of the Currency&#8217;s listing a sub-set of the domestic CDS market?</p>
<p>Baffled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

