<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reactions to Employment Data Will Mean More Than Data Itself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/reactions-to-employment-data-will-mean-more-than-data-itself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/reactions-to-employment-data-will-mean-more-than-data-itself/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:33:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/reactions-to-employment-data-will-mean-more-than-data-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-138179</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15519#comment-138179</guid>
		<description>Stock analyst on the morning news (some CBS radio feed) after the data came out:  &quot;It wasn&#039;t 600,000 jobs lost, so the market will see this as a positive.&quot;

Remind me again why the stock market is seen by some as reflective of the country&#039;s economic health?  Or is the word &quot;reflective&quot; used in the sense of a mirror, reversing everything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stock analyst on the morning news (some CBS radio feed) after the data came out:  &#8220;It wasn&#8217;t 600,000 jobs lost, so the market will see this as a positive.&#8221;</p>
<p>Remind me again why the stock market is seen by some as reflective of the country&#8217;s economic health?  Or is the word &#8220;reflective&#8221; used in the sense of a mirror, reversing everything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlomker</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/reactions-to-employment-data-will-mean-more-than-data-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-138143</link>
		<dc:creator>mlomker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15519#comment-138143</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s funny because I only care about how the market trades during the day.  Ah, the joys of being a daytrader.  I&#039;m expecting an intraday move up today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny because I only care about how the market trades during the day.  Ah, the joys of being a daytrader.  I&#8217;m expecting an intraday move up today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasRas</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/reactions-to-employment-data-will-mean-more-than-data-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-138138</link>
		<dc:creator>JasRas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15519#comment-138138</guid>
		<description>It is *always* the reaction to the news that counts...  Since a horrible number will no longer be a surprise, but is expected, a rally could ensue.  In addition, in twisted Wall St fashion, since every bad number only makes Obama&#039;s case for a huge, expeditious, stimulus bill, and the stimulus bill is &quot;good&quot; and what Wall St wants, we will continue to rally on bad news until that bill is passed.  Then bad new will be bad again.  The worry will be how quick can it be implemented, how quick will we see the effects...  It is really quite ridiculous.

Since November, we&#039;ve rally huge on every piece of bad news.  

But this too, shall pass.  Wall St is a fickle date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is *always* the reaction to the news that counts&#8230;  Since a horrible number will no longer be a surprise, but is expected, a rally could ensue.  In addition, in twisted Wall St fashion, since every bad number only makes Obama&#8217;s case for a huge, expeditious, stimulus bill, and the stimulus bill is &#8220;good&#8221; and what Wall St wants, we will continue to rally on bad news until that bill is passed.  Then bad new will be bad again.  The worry will be how quick can it be implemented, how quick will we see the effects&#8230;  It is really quite ridiculous.</p>
<p>Since November, we&#8217;ve rally huge on every piece of bad news.  </p>
<p>But this too, shall pass.  Wall St is a fickle date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jojo99</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/reactions-to-employment-data-will-mean-more-than-data-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-138134</link>
		<dc:creator>Jojo99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15519#comment-138134</guid>
		<description>They will pitch Friday&#039;s number as a lagging indicator (as they have been doing on CNBC all week).  Theyl&#039;l say don&#039;t pay attention to the number, the future is so bright, we need sunglasses. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They will pitch Friday&#8217;s number as a lagging indicator (as they have been doing on CNBC all week).  Theyl&#8217;l say don&#8217;t pay attention to the number, the future is so bright, we need sunglasses. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

