<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Savings vs Consumption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/savings-vs-consumption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/savings-vs-consumption/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:00:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dow</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/savings-vs-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-137968</link>
		<dc:creator>Dow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15297#comment-137968</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see another graph aside those two -- median wage since 1980.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see another graph aside those two &#8212; median wage since 1980.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donna</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/savings-vs-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-137847</link>
		<dc:creator>donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15297#comment-137847</guid>
		<description>If you want people with middle or lower incomes to spend more, you have to pay them more. Our current problem is all the money piled at the top. How much of a couple of billion can you really spend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want people with middle or lower incomes to spend more, you have to pay them more. Our current problem is all the money piled at the top. How much of a couple of billion can you really spend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GB</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/savings-vs-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-137833</link>
		<dc:creator>GB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15297#comment-137833</guid>
		<description>Good point zebov.  At 2% that would get you what, one mortgage payment if your laid off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point zebov.  At 2% that would get you what, one mortgage payment if your laid off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zebov</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/savings-vs-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-137826</link>
		<dc:creator>zebov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=15297#comment-137826</guid>
		<description>Bah!  Ridiculous.  Those calling &quot;Frugality Trap&quot; when the savings rate is 0-2% are absurd!  If THAT is really, the problem, then I can assure you that THAT is NOT the problem.  If our economy can&#039;t survive with a savings rate of 2% then it&#039;s not the savings rate that is the issue; it&#039;s our foundation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah!  Ridiculous.  Those calling &#8220;Frugality Trap&#8221; when the savings rate is 0-2% are absurd!  If THAT is really, the problem, then I can assure you that THAT is NOT the problem.  If our economy can&#8217;t survive with a savings rate of 2% then it&#8217;s not the savings rate that is the issue; it&#8217;s our foundation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
