<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super Cycle Market Overview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/supercycle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/supercycle/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:47:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kk</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/supercycle/comment-page-1/#comment-137270</link>
		<dc:creator>kk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 04:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=14683#comment-137270</guid>
		<description>Fortunately for us the internet archives other predictions by the &quot;cycle&quot; theorists such as this one..

http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/bronson/2003/1031.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortunately for us the internet archives other predictions by the &#8220;cycle&#8221; theorists such as this one..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/bronson/2003/1031.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/bronson/2003/1031.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markp</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/supercycle/comment-page-1/#comment-136950</link>
		<dc:creator>markp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=14683#comment-136950</guid>
		<description>It did twice, 1929 and 1999. And then the upper channel trendline was shifted up to accomodate those peaks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It did twice, 1929 and 1999. And then the upper channel trendline was shifted up to accomodate those peaks <img src='http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/supercycle/comment-page-1/#comment-136943</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=14683#comment-136943</guid>
		<description>Love charts like this..but it rasises questions...what are they using for &quot;stock market&quot;...S&amp;P500? what are they doing to simulate whatever index they use back to 1870?...The 16 year periodicity is more well defined? It happened twice in a row over 140 years... It&#039;s hard for me to believe the &quot;real total return&quot; never once got outside this uptrend channel in 140 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love charts like this..but it rasises questions&#8230;what are they using for &#8220;stock market&#8221;&#8230;S&amp;P500? what are they doing to simulate whatever index they use back to 1870?&#8230;The 16 year periodicity is more well defined? It happened twice in a row over 140 years&#8230; It&#8217;s hard for me to believe the &#8220;real total return&#8221; never once got outside this uptrend channel in 140 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
