<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Open Letter to Tim Geithner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/an-open-letter-to-tim-geithner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/an-open-letter-to-tim-geithner/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Davies</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/an-open-letter-to-tim-geithner/comment-page-1/#comment-143896</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=17992#comment-143896</guid>
		<description>Preferred shareholders getting &quot;toasted&quot; would really hit endowment fund payouts. With so many in the Administration and Federal Reserve Banks having strong links to Academia,  could this have at least a subliminal impact on their decision making?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preferred shareholders getting &#8220;toasted&#8221; would really hit endowment fund payouts. With so many in the Administration and Federal Reserve Banks having strong links to Academia,  could this have at least a subliminal impact on their decision making?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bemused</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/an-open-letter-to-tim-geithner/comment-page-1/#comment-143878</link>
		<dc:creator>bemused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 03:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=17992#comment-143878</guid>
		<description>I would like to put another thought in here; really a sequence of thoughts. Please follow my logic and the show me where I&#039;m wrong:

1) Any ideas put forward should help revive the economy short term while advancing systemic solutions long term. No other suggestions should be entertained.
2) The writedowns of the last 6-12 months have resulted from the devaluation of what are now value-free  securities (ie. those for which there are illiquid markets),  backed by an unknown mix  of mortages  of varying underlying value, including many sub-prime, etc.
3) The banks have already taken the hit on these and either recapitalized or taken TARP or other govt infusions. Ie if these the securities ever regain any significant value, the banks holding them will make money...
4) Since the outcome of 3 is unlikely to happen soon, pass on the loss to the underlying instruments. Yes, I do mean that. Devalue the debt owed, so that If the nominal value of an MBS is $100M but it is currently (over?) valued at $20M and has not market, reduce the obligation of the underlying mortages by 80% accross the board. That will almost certainly ensure that the homeowners concerned will be able to pay the balance offs, will improve their credit ratings, andwill have more disposable income to spend and stimulate the economy. It will also guarantee the new $20m face value of the MBS. 
5) note that 4 costs both the taxpayer and the banks exactly $0.

(I have been considering airing this for a while, then I heard that John Stuart was proposing that the TARP money be given to the debtors so that they could pay down their mortgages, which would still not solve the liquidy and credit problems.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to put another thought in here; really a sequence of thoughts. Please follow my logic and the show me where I&#8217;m wrong:</p>
<p>1) Any ideas put forward should help revive the economy short term while advancing systemic solutions long term. No other suggestions should be entertained.<br />
2) The writedowns of the last 6-12 months have resulted from the devaluation of what are now value-free  securities (ie. those for which there are illiquid markets),  backed by an unknown mix  of mortages  of varying underlying value, including many sub-prime, etc.<br />
3) The banks have already taken the hit on these and either recapitalized or taken TARP or other govt infusions. Ie if these the securities ever regain any significant value, the banks holding them will make money&#8230;<br />
4) Since the outcome of 3 is unlikely to happen soon, pass on the loss to the underlying instruments. Yes, I do mean that. Devalue the debt owed, so that If the nominal value of an MBS is $100M but it is currently (over?) valued at $20M and has not market, reduce the obligation of the underlying mortages by 80% accross the board. That will almost certainly ensure that the homeowners concerned will be able to pay the balance offs, will improve their credit ratings, andwill have more disposable income to spend and stimulate the economy. It will also guarantee the new $20m face value of the MBS.<br />
5) note that 4 costs both the taxpayer and the banks exactly $0.</p>
<p>(I have been considering airing this for a while, then I heard that John Stuart was proposing that the TARP money be given to the debtors so that they could pay down their mortgages, which would still not solve the liquidy and credit problems.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Tabbo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/an-open-letter-to-tim-geithner/comment-page-1/#comment-143875</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Tabbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 02:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=17992#comment-143875</guid>
		<description>Blog post on Japanese &quot;issues&quot; for Bruce in TN

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/02/japan-on-edge-of-abyss.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blog post on Japanese &#8220;issues&#8221; for Bruce in TN</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/02/japan-on-edge-of-abyss.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/02/japan-on-edge-of-abyss.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Tabbo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/an-open-letter-to-tim-geithner/comment-page-1/#comment-143872</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Tabbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 02:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=17992#comment-143872</guid>
		<description>bruce in TN.  

Japan is imploding.  The strong Yen and Global Depression has caused some of the large industrial output drops ever recorded in modern economic times....just a guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bruce in TN.  </p>
<p>Japan is imploding.  The strong Yen and Global Depression has caused some of the large industrial output drops ever recorded in modern economic times&#8230;.just a guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Tabbo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/an-open-letter-to-tim-geithner/comment-page-1/#comment-143871</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Tabbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 02:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=17992#comment-143871</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what letters Tim Geithner is reading but there are definitely some things happening in D.C. right now that may not be so good for the Stock Market.  I don&#039;t know what&#039;s happening, but the technicals look really, really bad at this point.  Under the most obvious model I can see, we should see a collapse in the next 48 hours.  The model suggests a &quot;third of a Third&quot; wave coming and requires a sharp drop very soon.  If fact if we don&#039;t see  big dump by Friday, and instead we just chop and grind higher, then this most bearish short term model is probably not valid.  Any break back above 842 (futures) would harm this short term uber-bearish model as well.  

For anyone holding length, I would use 810, 800 and 780 on the CASH S&amp;P as some round stop loss levels.  I.e. Break of 810 should be Code Yellow, 800 should be Code Orange and 780 should be your Red Threat Level....i.e. Get the F*&amp;k out the Market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what letters Tim Geithner is reading but there are definitely some things happening in D.C. right now that may not be so good for the Stock Market.  I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s happening, but the technicals look really, really bad at this point.  Under the most obvious model I can see, we should see a collapse in the next 48 hours.  The model suggests a &#8220;third of a Third&#8221; wave coming and requires a sharp drop very soon.  If fact if we don&#8217;t see  big dump by Friday, and instead we just chop and grind higher, then this most bearish short term model is probably not valid.  Any break back above 842 (futures) would harm this short term uber-bearish model as well.  </p>
<p>For anyone holding length, I would use 810, 800 and 780 on the CASH S&amp;P as some round stop loss levels.  I.e. Break of 810 should be Code Yellow, 800 should be Code Orange and 780 should be your Red Threat Level&#8230;.i.e. Get the F*&amp;k out the Market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Aurelius</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/an-open-letter-to-tim-geithner/comment-page-1/#comment-143848</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Aurelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=17992#comment-143848</guid>
		<description>Let them ALL fail as the market is insisting they should, and as they so justly deserve to do. As for compensation of their executives, civil and criminal penalties should apply - it is the American people who should receive recompense. This is not the time for coddling criminals.

Stand out of the way and let the chips fall where they may.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let them ALL fail as the market is insisting they should, and as they so justly deserve to do. As for compensation of their executives, civil and criminal penalties should apply &#8211; it is the American people who should receive recompense. This is not the time for coddling criminals.</p>
<p>Stand out of the way and let the chips fall where they may.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce in Tn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/an-open-letter-to-tim-geithner/comment-page-1/#comment-143847</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce in Tn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=17992#comment-143847</guid>
		<description>OK...someone smart...what is happening in Japan?

http://www.rttnews.com/CorpInfo/EconomicCalendar.aspx

2/4/09 06:50 PM Japan Buying Foreign Bonds (Yen) JAN 30 ¥ 457.4 B - ¥ 54.2 B Japan 
2/4/09 06:50 PM Japan Buying Foreign Stocks (Yen) JAN 30 ¥ 482.2 B - ¥ 90.7 B Japan 
2/4/09 06:50 PM Foreigners Buying Japan Bonds (Yen) JAN 30 ¥ -341.7 B - ¥ -92.5 B Japan 
2/4/09 06:50 PM Foreigners Buying Japan Stocks (Yen) JAN 30 ¥ -328.9 B - ¥ -376.3 B Japan 


From page 3...

It appears the rest of the globe is getting out of the Japanese stock market and that Japan is buying foreign bonds and getting out of their bond market...

I am not interested much in stocks here, but I am interested in bonds...Mannwich, Lefty, Karen, Crummy?

any reasons??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK&#8230;someone smart&#8230;what is happening in Japan?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rttnews.com/CorpInfo/EconomicCalendar.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.rttnews.com/CorpInfo/EconomicCalendar.aspx</a></p>
<p>2/4/09 06:50 PM Japan Buying Foreign Bonds (Yen) JAN 30 ¥ 457.4 B &#8211; ¥ 54.2 B Japan<br />
2/4/09 06:50 PM Japan Buying Foreign Stocks (Yen) JAN 30 ¥ 482.2 B &#8211; ¥ 90.7 B Japan<br />
2/4/09 06:50 PM Foreigners Buying Japan Bonds (Yen) JAN 30 ¥ -341.7 B &#8211; ¥ -92.5 B Japan<br />
2/4/09 06:50 PM Foreigners Buying Japan Stocks (Yen) JAN 30 ¥ -328.9 B &#8211; ¥ -376.3 B Japan </p>
<p>From page 3&#8230;</p>
<p>It appears the rest of the globe is getting out of the Japanese stock market and that Japan is buying foreign bonds and getting out of their bond market&#8230;</p>
<p>I am not interested much in stocks here, but I am interested in bonds&#8230;Mannwich, Lefty, Karen, Crummy?</p>
<p>any reasons??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AGG</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/an-open-letter-to-tim-geithner/comment-page-1/#comment-143844</link>
		<dc:creator>AGG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=17992#comment-143844</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a good start. 
Add to it that every tax paying American citizen gets a percentage of common stock and  voting rights and from all TARP institutions and it becomes a square deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good start.<br />
Add to it that every tax paying American citizen gets a percentage of common stock and  voting rights and from all TARP institutions and it becomes a square deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Whalen</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/an-open-letter-to-tim-geithner/comment-page-1/#comment-143841</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Whalen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=17992#comment-143841</guid>
		<description>Ditto to Curmudgeon.  And I don&#039;t see any discussion of a haircut for the debt???  

The loss rates on the top banks are going to be multiples of Tier One Risk Based Capital, INCLUDING THE TARP.  The TARP preferred in C, BAC, JPM and probabaly WFC  is toast, IMHO.  So any discussion that does not include a proposal for a pre-pack deal to haircut the debt is not credible, again my view.

How about this?  We stop out the loss rates for the $1.5 trillion in bank bond holders at 50% of par, but they must agree to accept only token equity participation in the new bank and rely on the bad bank outlined above to recover above 50%.  For C bond holders, that may not be a bad deal.   

Q: When are the C and other money center bondholders going to organize so that they can discuss good proposals like this.  Whether or not this precise outline is the ticket, this is the type of conversation that need occur.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto to Curmudgeon.  And I don&#8217;t see any discussion of a haircut for the debt???  </p>
<p>The loss rates on the top banks are going to be multiples of Tier One Risk Based Capital, INCLUDING THE TARP.  The TARP preferred in C, BAC, JPM and probabaly WFC  is toast, IMHO.  So any discussion that does not include a proposal for a pre-pack deal to haircut the debt is not credible, again my view.</p>
<p>How about this?  We stop out the loss rates for the $1.5 trillion in bank bond holders at 50% of par, but they must agree to accept only token equity participation in the new bank and rely on the bad bank outlined above to recover above 50%.  For C bond holders, that may not be a bad deal.   </p>
<p>Q: When are the C and other money center bondholders going to organize so that they can discuss good proposals like this.  Whether or not this precise outline is the ticket, this is the type of conversation that need occur.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Curmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/an-open-letter-to-tim-geithner/comment-page-1/#comment-143839</link>
		<dc:creator>The Curmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=17992#comment-143839</guid>
		<description>Oops...wanted to leave a reply, which is--What the hell is the difference between &quot;smaller&quot; banks and the behemoths?  If its okay for smaller banks to fail, why not bigger ones?

It just incentivizes the already stupid acquisitions of banks, large and small, everywhere.  Just like a the saying goes about a bank debtor-- if failing costs the government a million dollars, the government owns you.  If failing costs it a billion, you own the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops&#8230;wanted to leave a reply, which is&#8211;What the hell is the difference between &#8220;smaller&#8221; banks and the behemoths?  If its okay for smaller banks to fail, why not bigger ones?</p>
<p>It just incentivizes the already stupid acquisitions of banks, large and small, everywhere.  Just like a the saying goes about a bank debtor&#8211; if failing costs the government a million dollars, the government owns you.  If failing costs it a billion, you own the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

