<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bondholder Haircuts at Citigroup:  At the End of Q1, the Children&#8217;s Hour Ends in Washington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/bondholder-haircuts-at-citigroup-at-the-end-of-q1-the-childrens-hour-ends-in-washington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/bondholder-haircuts-at-citigroup-at-the-end-of-q1-the-childrens-hour-ends-in-washington/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:28:40 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jimmy smith</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/bondholder-haircuts-at-citigroup-at-the-end-of-q1-the-childrens-hour-ends-in-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-145719</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18961#comment-145719</guid>
		<description>Exactly.  Now they have a greater % of their assets funded by (very cheap and stable) deposits, vs. having to access the debt markets. 

JPM has been fairly unscathed thus far and expected, by everybody, to inherit the keys to the kingdom.   Are the people saying this doing research or just  watching the stock price and trying to catch the bottom?   I heard on CNBC a manager say he&#039;s buying boat loads of JPM because the market has declared them to be The Winner.   Not a lot of research there!

I think there might be a lot more behind the scenes activity between Dimon and the gov, given JPM&#039;s over-the-counter derivative exchange business.  If anything were to happen to that say good by to the global economy.   I&#039;m wondering if the gov will therefore protect JPM at any cost, even in secret.  

But, will they have to raise capital due to loan losses coming down the pike, which is going to be costly to current shareholders?  Or worse, will they have to be restructured?  

I guess it depends on how conservative their underwriting was during the credit bubble.   Goldman reports that they have only a 2% hit to loans  (NPA+90PD/Loans) thus far which is low, and successfully avoided a lot of the toxic asset issues.    The other wild card is whether the gov will suspend mark-to-market...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.  Now they have a greater % of their assets funded by (very cheap and stable) deposits, vs. having to access the debt markets. </p>
<p>JPM has been fairly unscathed thus far and expected, by everybody, to inherit the keys to the kingdom.   Are the people saying this doing research or just  watching the stock price and trying to catch the bottom?   I heard on CNBC a manager say he&#8217;s buying boat loads of JPM because the market has declared them to be The Winner.   Not a lot of research there!</p>
<p>I think there might be a lot more behind the scenes activity between Dimon and the gov, given JPM&#8217;s over-the-counter derivative exchange business.  If anything were to happen to that say good by to the global economy.   I&#8217;m wondering if the gov will therefore protect JPM at any cost, even in secret.  </p>
<p>But, will they have to raise capital due to loan losses coming down the pike, which is going to be costly to current shareholders?  Or worse, will they have to be restructured?  </p>
<p>I guess it depends on how conservative their underwriting was during the credit bubble.   Goldman reports that they have only a 2% hit to loans  (NPA+90PD/Loans) thus far which is low, and successfully avoided a lot of the toxic asset issues.    The other wild card is whether the gov will suspend mark-to-market&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Whalen</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/bondholder-haircuts-at-citigroup-at-the-end-of-q1-the-childrens-hour-ends-in-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-145710</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Whalen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18961#comment-145710</guid>
		<description>I put em in this order right now:  C, BAC, JPM, WFC.   At least Dimon bought WaMu after going through a restructuring!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I put em in this order right now:  C, BAC, JPM, WFC.   At least Dimon bought WaMu after going through a restructuring!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnhaskell</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/bondholder-haircuts-at-citigroup-at-the-end-of-q1-the-childrens-hour-ends-in-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-145705</link>
		<dc:creator>johnhaskell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18961#comment-145705</guid>
		<description>jimmy smith-

ha ha ha ha ha ha!

WaMu saved them!

oh, you&#039;re killing me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jimmy smith-</p>
<p>ha ha ha ha ha ha!</p>
<p>WaMu saved them!</p>
<p>oh, you&#8217;re killing me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy smith</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/bondholder-haircuts-at-citigroup-at-the-end-of-q1-the-childrens-hour-ends-in-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-145700</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18961#comment-145700</guid>
		<description>Mr. Whalen, 

What is your position on JPM currently?  I know you thought they were in trouble and would need to enter receivership.   Do you still feel that way?  Or did the WaMu purchase save them?  

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Whalen, </p>
<p>What is your position on JPM currently?  I know you thought they were in trouble and would need to enter receivership.   Do you still feel that way?  Or did the WaMu purchase save them?  </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Whalen</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/bondholder-haircuts-at-citigroup-at-the-end-of-q1-the-childrens-hour-ends-in-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-145668</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Whalen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18961#comment-145668</guid>
		<description>Have of Citi&#039;s liabilities are deposits.  Other half are in play.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have of Citi&#8217;s liabilities are deposits.  Other half are in play.  <img src='http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roylat</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/bondholder-haircuts-at-citigroup-at-the-end-of-q1-the-childrens-hour-ends-in-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-145625</link>
		<dc:creator>roylat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18961#comment-145625</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve wondered how much government guarantee of depositors would cost. 

Might it justify in part the bailout effort? A quick analysis of the numbers in the Citi financial statement (see http://roylat.com, &quot;Guaranteeing Depositors ...) shows that there is almost certainly more than enough to cover all deposits, and certainly more than enough to cover U.S. deposits.

US deposits (both time and checking) total only $227 billion. Equity plus long-term debt equals $510 billion. There seems no possibility that losses on loan portfolios could be greater than this cushion.

This analysis just adds to the many other arguments made for restructuring rather than bailing out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve wondered how much government guarantee of depositors would cost. </p>
<p>Might it justify in part the bailout effort? A quick analysis of the numbers in the Citi financial statement (see <a href="http://roylat.com" rel="nofollow">http://roylat.com</a>, &#8220;Guaranteeing Depositors &#8230;) shows that there is almost certainly more than enough to cover all deposits, and certainly more than enough to cover U.S. deposits.</p>
<p>US deposits (both time and checking) total only $227 billion. Equity plus long-term debt equals $510 billion. There seems no possibility that losses on loan portfolios could be greater than this cushion.</p>
<p>This analysis just adds to the many other arguments made for restructuring rather than bailing out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jritzema</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/bondholder-haircuts-at-citigroup-at-the-end-of-q1-the-childrens-hour-ends-in-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-145545</link>
		<dc:creator>jritzema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18961#comment-145545</guid>
		<description>Sure, haircut the bondholders, after the equity, hybrid and preferred investors (including TARP CPP) go to zero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, haircut the bondholders, after the equity, hybrid and preferred investors (including TARP CPP) go to zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftback</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/bondholder-haircuts-at-citigroup-at-the-end-of-q1-the-childrens-hour-ends-in-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-145497</link>
		<dc:creator>leftback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18961#comment-145497</guid>
		<description>The triage may finally have begun - let&#039;s hope so:

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/02/stress-test-almost-100-regulators-at.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The triage may finally have begun &#8211; let&#8217;s hope so:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/02/stress-test-almost-100-regulators-at.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/02/stress-test-almost-100-regulators-at.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftback</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/bondholder-haircuts-at-citigroup-at-the-end-of-q1-the-childrens-hour-ends-in-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-145492</link>
		<dc:creator>leftback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18961#comment-145492</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right Chris, we need to grow up and empower a new RTC operation.

Nationalization, cramdowns and haircuts. 
Perp walks, FBI probes and show trials. 

It&#039;s gonna be a fun couple of years. Got popcorn?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Chris, we need to grow up and empower a new RTC operation.</p>
<p>Nationalization, cramdowns and haircuts.<br />
Perp walks, FBI probes and show trials. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s gonna be a fun couple of years. Got popcorn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
