The following is via economist Warren Mosler of Illinois Income Investors Offshore Advisors.
Mosler is a a believer in MOSLER’S LAW, which states: There is no financial crisis so deep that a sufficiently large increase in public spending cannot deal with it.
The media is screaming that deficit spending simply takes money from borrowers and gives it to someone else, so it doesn’t work.
This is NOT the case. In fact, deficit spending ADDS to our total savings of financial assets.
Operationally, this is how $100 billion of deficit spending ‘works’ to ADD to nominal savings of financial assets:
- The Treasury sells $100 billion of treasury securities.
- Paying for the new securities reduces member bank balances held at the Fed by $100 billion.
- And our holdings of treasury securities increase by $100 billion.
- The Treasury spends the $100 billion it got from selling us the $100 billion of new treasury securities.
- This increases member bank balances at the Fed by $100 billion.
We buy treasury securities from the government which means we have $100 billion more treasury securities.
We pay for them which means we have $100 billion less in our bank accounts.
So far all we have done is exchange bank balances at the Fed for treasury securities, which also held at the Fed.
So far nothing of economic consequence has changed, apart from now we could be earning more interest on our treasury securities than we had been earning on our Fed balances.
- Bank balances are back where they started from.
- Our holdings of treasury securities, which are financial assets and saving, have increased by $100 billion.
Conclusion and proof:
Government deficit spending of $100 billion necessarily increases savings of financial assets by $100 billion.
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.