<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TARP Recipients and their Bonuses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/tarp-recipients-and-their-bonuses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/tarp-recipients-and-their-bonuses/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:07:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jojo99</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/tarp-recipients-and-their-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-144183</link>
		<dc:creator>Jojo99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18289#comment-144183</guid>
		<description>Ever wonder why the pols are so concerned with the health of the financial industry?  Here&#039;s part of the answer:

===================

TARP Recipients Paid Out $114 Million for Politicking Last Year
Published by Communications on February 4, 2009 9:52 AM

The companies that have been awarded taxpayers&#039; money from Congress&#039;s bailout bill spent $77 million on lobbying and $37 million on federal campaign contributions, Center finds. The return on investment: 258,449 percent. 

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2009/02/tarp-recipients-paid-out-114-m.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever wonder why the pols are so concerned with the health of the financial industry?  Here&#8217;s part of the answer:</p>
<p>===================</p>
<p>TARP Recipients Paid Out $114 Million for Politicking Last Year<br />
Published by Communications on February 4, 2009 9:52 AM</p>
<p>The companies that have been awarded taxpayers&#8217; money from Congress&#8217;s bailout bill spent $77 million on lobbying and $37 million on federal campaign contributions, Center finds. The return on investment: 258,449 percent. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2009/02/tarp-recipients-paid-out-114-m.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2009/02/tarp-recipients-paid-out-114-m.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bklnyc</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/tarp-recipients-and-their-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-144163</link>
		<dc:creator>bklnyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18289#comment-144163</guid>
		<description>Barry,

I would love to see this alongside their respective political contributions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry,</p>
<p>I would love to see this alongside their respective political contributions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftback</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/tarp-recipients-and-their-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-144161</link>
		<dc:creator>leftback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18289#comment-144161</guid>
		<description>It all makes sense to me, it&#039;s just redistribution of wealth.
Pretty soon we will have a new 1040:

Step 1: How much money did you make last year?
Step 2: Send it ALL to a 26 year old associate at Goldman Sachs who had a BUY rating on Bear Stearns. 
Step 3: Don&#039;t forget to pay the postage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all makes sense to me, it&#8217;s just redistribution of wealth.<br />
Pretty soon we will have a new 1040:</p>
<p>Step 1: How much money did you make last year?<br />
Step 2: Send it ALL to a 26 year old associate at Goldman Sachs who had a BUY rating on Bear Stearns.<br />
Step 3: Don&#8217;t forget to pay the postage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/tarp-recipients-and-their-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-144148</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18289#comment-144148</guid>
		<description>Sure is a good thing that money isn&#039;t fungible.  

Besides, as long as no CEO is going to make more than $500K going forward, I say, let&#039;s just go ahead and borrow $3 trillion  to give to the bankers.   

After all, Obama says we need &quot;bold&quot; action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure is a good thing that money isn&#8217;t fungible.  </p>
<p>Besides, as long as no CEO is going to make more than $500K going forward, I say, let&#8217;s just go ahead and borrow $3 trillion  to give to the bankers.   </p>
<p>After all, Obama says we need &#8220;bold&#8221; action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark mchugh</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/tarp-recipients-and-their-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-144142</link>
		<dc:creator>mark mchugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18289#comment-144142</guid>
		<description>Can we start putting some of these &quot;Preference by Loreal&quot; (I&#039;m worth it) girls on TV?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we start putting some of these &#8220;Preference by Loreal&#8221; (I&#8217;m worth it) girls on TV?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark mchugh</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/tarp-recipients-and-their-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-144134</link>
		<dc:creator>mark mchugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18289#comment-144134</guid>
		<description>When we talk about taxpayer money, why don&#039;t we count all the money put into 401k&#039;s that&#039;s been vaporized too.  Millions of Americans have watched their life&#039;s savings vanish, and MSM wants us to worry that smart people leaving Wall Street firms?................to go where?

Pay them all in their own common stock and make them hold it for two years.  We&#039;ll let them borrow to survive and we&#039;ll balance out at the end.  How&#039;s that sound?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we talk about taxpayer money, why don&#8217;t we count all the money put into 401k&#8217;s that&#8217;s been vaporized too.  Millions of Americans have watched their life&#8217;s savings vanish, and MSM wants us to worry that smart people leaving Wall Street firms?&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.to go where?</p>
<p>Pay them all in their own common stock and make them hold it for two years.  We&#8217;ll let them borrow to survive and we&#8217;ll balance out at the end.  How&#8217;s that sound?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/tarp-recipients-and-their-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-144130</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18289#comment-144130</guid>
		<description>We are the morons.  We need to collectively refuse to pay taxes.  We need to hunt down every banker, politician, mortgage broker....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are the morons.  We need to collectively refuse to pay taxes.  We need to hunt down every banker, politician, mortgage broker&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Aurelius</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/tarp-recipients-and-their-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-144129</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Aurelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18289#comment-144129</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got a bonus for all of them: prison time at hard labor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a bonus for all of them: prison time at hard labor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VennData</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/tarp-recipients-and-their-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-144128</link>
		<dc:creator>VennData</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18289#comment-144128</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve gone from not-negotiating-drug-companies-on-price to limiting-executive-pay.  Any moderates out there? 

At least the people who hate a maximum wage are the same people who hate a minimum wage?   ...Except when they want 4% mortgages for homeowners:

http://uk.reuters.com/article/economyNews/idUKTRE5115UL20090202 

And if we&#039;re going to claw back salaries, let&#039;s claw back salaries from the lobbyists who stuck us that &quot;Prescription Drug Benefit.&quot;   Is there anybody&#039; who&#039;s against  lobbyist clawbacks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve gone from not-negotiating-drug-companies-on-price to limiting-executive-pay.  Any moderates out there? </p>
<p>At least the people who hate a maximum wage are the same people who hate a minimum wage?   &#8230;Except when they want 4% mortgages for homeowners:</p>
<p><a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/economyNews/idUKTRE5115UL20090202" rel="nofollow">http://uk.reuters.com/article/economyNews/idUKTRE5115UL20090202</a> </p>
<p>And if we&#8217;re going to claw back salaries, let&#8217;s claw back salaries from the lobbyists who stuck us that &#8220;Prescription Drug Benefit.&#8221;   Is there anybody&#8217; who&#8217;s against  lobbyist clawbacks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eleanorpagedarby</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/tarp-recipients-and-their-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-144127</link>
		<dc:creator>eleanorpagedarby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=18289#comment-144127</guid>
		<description>Really glad we used public money to make sure the bankers got paid this year! They were so good to accept only $85 billion in bonuses, much less than they got last year. Maybe those of us who think the bankers aren&#039;t getting enough tax money can start an &quot;adopt a banker&quot; program and sign over our paychecks directly to deserving bankers. 

Of course, it&#039;ll take about 10 wage-earners per banker to get them to the bonus level they&#039;re accustomed to. Who else is in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really glad we used public money to make sure the bankers got paid this year! They were so good to accept only $85 billion in bonuses, much less than they got last year. Maybe those of us who think the bankers aren&#8217;t getting enough tax money can start an &#8220;adopt a banker&#8221; program and sign over our paychecks directly to deserving bankers. </p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;ll take about 10 wage-earners per banker to get them to the bonus level they&#8217;re accustomed to. Who else is in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
