<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Travel Efficiency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/travel-efficiency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/travel-efficiency/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:24:25 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/travel-efficiency/comment-page-1/#comment-148604</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20067#comment-148604</guid>
		<description>well, transport of goods, rather than peeps, consumes a great chunk of our total demand.

with that, we should continue to subsidize OTR haulers, grandstand about &#039;bullet trains&#039;, support &#039;light-rail&#039;, and keep the lid on CNG vehicles..

w/ the Audacity of Hope we can Stay the Course..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, transport of goods, rather than peeps, consumes a great chunk of our total demand.</p>
<p>with that, we should continue to subsidize OTR haulers, grandstand about &#8216;bullet trains&#8217;, support &#8216;light-rail&#8217;, and keep the lid on CNG vehicles..</p>
<p>w/ the Audacity of Hope we can Stay the Course..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donna</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/travel-efficiency/comment-page-1/#comment-148566</link>
		<dc:creator>donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20067#comment-148566</guid>
		<description>Well, when we&#039;re traveling 350 miles, we almost always stop for burgers or something in the van, so it&#039;s a bit more than what&#039;s shown, really...

But I can carry seven passengers, eight if everyone squeezes in real tight...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, when we&#8217;re traveling 350 miles, we almost always stop for burgers or something in the van, so it&#8217;s a bit more than what&#8217;s shown, really&#8230;</p>
<p>But I can carry seven passengers, eight if everyone squeezes in real tight&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mblank</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/travel-efficiency/comment-page-1/#comment-148468</link>
		<dc:creator>mblank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20067#comment-148468</guid>
		<description>deanscamaro: If you look at those charts, above the car stacks of gasoline it has dotted lines showing where the efficiency cuts off for 1, 2, and 4 passengers. For the SUV, 1 passenger is the 17 cans of gas, the 2 passenger line cuts off at 9 cans of gas, and 4 people is 4 cans of gas. So it does take into account the different load levels for the vehicles and compiles them into a single bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>deanscamaro: If you look at those charts, above the car stacks of gasoline it has dotted lines showing where the efficiency cuts off for 1, 2, and 4 passengers. For the SUV, 1 passenger is the 17 cans of gas, the 2 passenger line cuts off at 9 cans of gas, and 4 people is 4 cans of gas. So it does take into account the different load levels for the vehicles and compiles them into a single bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deanscamaro</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/travel-efficiency/comment-page-1/#comment-148440</link>
		<dc:creator>deanscamaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20067#comment-148440</guid>
		<description>Talk about showing only part of the meaningful data!  The cruise ship is probably always full (just guessing), but the SUV many times carries less than its capacity.  The bicycle is ALWAYS fully loaded, while the sedan is hardly ever fully loaded, etc. etc. etc.  Show that part of the data and it even get worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about showing only part of the meaningful data!  The cruise ship is probably always full (just guessing), but the SUV many times carries less than its capacity.  The bicycle is ALWAYS fully loaded, while the sedan is hardly ever fully loaded, etc. etc. etc.  Show that part of the data and it even get worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
