<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China – better days ahead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/china-%e2%80%93-better-days-ahead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/china-%e2%80%93-better-days-ahead/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dunnage</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/china-%e2%80%93-better-days-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-151796</link>
		<dc:creator>dunnage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 20:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20934#comment-151796</guid>
		<description>How could anybody imagine China being anything but screwed like the rest of the world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could anybody imagine China being anything but screwed like the rest of the world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EDF</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/china-%e2%80%93-better-days-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-151490</link>
		<dc:creator>EDF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20934#comment-151490</guid>
		<description>@johnbaring

Roubini agrees. See page 2 of the URL below. 

http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/04/global-recession-insolvent-opinions-columnists-roubini-economy.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@johnbaring</p>
<p>Roubini agrees. See page 2 of the URL below. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/04/global-recession-insolvent-opinions-columnists-roubini-economy.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/04/global-recession-insolvent-opinions-columnists-roubini-economy.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what_what</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/china-%e2%80%93-better-days-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-151205</link>
		<dc:creator>what_what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20934#comment-151205</guid>
		<description>Is China&#039;s own consumption enough to keep them on their projected growth path? It seems like they will be affected by depressed US markets no matter what, given their reliance on exports. This news clip has some perspectives from Chinese citizens, and they sound a lot like American citizens being interviewed about the economy - worried and gloomy.

http://www.newsy.com/videos/china_pushes_for_growth/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is China&#8217;s own consumption enough to keep them on their projected growth path? It seems like they will be affected by depressed US markets no matter what, given their reliance on exports. This news clip has some perspectives from Chinese citizens, and they sound a lot like American citizens being interviewed about the economy &#8211; worried and gloomy.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/china_pushes_for_growth/" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsy.com/videos/china_pushes_for_growth/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arcticpup</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/china-%e2%80%93-better-days-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-151080</link>
		<dc:creator>arcticpup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20934#comment-151080</guid>
		<description>maybe... internal consumption they do have 1 billion people... that&#039;s alot of consuming... and if the government is starting to spend... they&#039;ll tax to keep going... it&#039;s not that hard to believe they are fueling there own growth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe&#8230; internal consumption they do have 1 billion people&#8230; that&#8217;s alot of consuming&#8230; and if the government is starting to spend&#8230; they&#8217;ll tax to keep going&#8230; it&#8217;s not that hard to believe they are fueling there own growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnbaring</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/china-%e2%80%93-better-days-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-151037</link>
		<dc:creator>johnbaring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20934#comment-151037</guid>
		<description>This is illogical.  We have a world economy not a bunch of national economies.  This is especially true with China whose major revenue is from exports.  Who is placing these orders and on what basis?  Those are the businesses we should be looking at.  Or is this, as others have said, fluff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is illogical.  We have a world economy not a bunch of national economies.  This is especially true with China whose major revenue is from exports.  Who is placing these orders and on what basis?  Those are the businesses we should be looking at.  Or is this, as others have said, fluff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyVee</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/china-%e2%80%93-better-days-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-151002</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 04:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20934#comment-151002</guid>
		<description>I think that China may have learned how to fluff the numbers. 
Q. How does it grow in all others contract?  
A. It doesn&#039;t, but the numbers do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that China may have learned how to fluff the numbers.<br />
Q. How does it grow in all others contract?<br />
A. It doesn&#8217;t, but the numbers do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usphoenix</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/china-%e2%80%93-better-days-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-150939</link>
		<dc:creator>usphoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20934#comment-150939</guid>
		<description>Wow.  How very cool that 5.67% growth is viewed badly.  And what was the view during the Cultural Revolution?  

And what exactly does that mean for the US?  $140/b oil again.  Doesn&#039;t seem like anything good for China is good for us except when they feel rich enough to buy our debt.  Well may be they&#039;d rather buy debt from Greece.  

So, I&#039;m confused.  Is China&#039;s zoom based on their export balance or what?  

Does that mean they&#039;re finding their own internal consumption to fuel their growth?  And don&#039;t need us anymore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  How very cool that 5.67% growth is viewed badly.  And what was the view during the Cultural Revolution?  </p>
<p>And what exactly does that mean for the US?  $140/b oil again.  Doesn&#8217;t seem like anything good for China is good for us except when they feel rich enough to buy our debt.  Well may be they&#8217;d rather buy debt from Greece.  </p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m confused.  Is China&#8217;s zoom based on their export balance or what?  </p>
<p>Does that mean they&#8217;re finding their own internal consumption to fuel their growth?  And don&#8217;t need us anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

