<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNBC&#8217;s Dylan Ratigan to ABC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/cnbcs-dylan-ratigan-to-abc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/cnbcs-dylan-ratigan-to-abc/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:05:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ratigan Cheerleader</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/cnbcs-dylan-ratigan-to-abc/comment-page-2/#comment-158884</link>
		<dc:creator>Ratigan Cheerleader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22683#comment-158884</guid>
		<description>My financial fantasy boyfriend cannot emerge on another network too soon to suit me.  I just want his straight talk assessments on my TV like yesterday.  

Apparently he is bound by a CNBC contractural agreement that will not allow him to accept a TV position and develop an outlet for somewhere between 3 to 6 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My financial fantasy boyfriend cannot emerge on another network too soon to suit me.  I just want his straight talk assessments on my TV like yesterday.  </p>
<p>Apparently he is bound by a CNBC contractural agreement that will not allow him to accept a TV position and develop an outlet for somewhere between 3 to 6 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Tabbo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/cnbcs-dylan-ratigan-to-abc/comment-page-2/#comment-158061</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Tabbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22683#comment-158061</guid>
		<description>My evolution away from CNBC is now complete.  Fast Money was the only show I watched, more for Macke,  Ratigan and Guy.  I used P.Najarian as a reliable fade whenever he&#039;s foaming. 

D. Ratigan was probably the smartest and most articulate anchors they had.  I happen to think M. Francis is probably second....

CNBC is really terrible.  My life and trading has been better since turning it off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My evolution away from CNBC is now complete.  Fast Money was the only show I watched, more for Macke,  Ratigan and Guy.  I used P.Najarian as a reliable fade whenever he&#8217;s foaming. </p>
<p>D. Ratigan was probably the smartest and most articulate anchors they had.  I happen to think M. Francis is probably second&#8230;.</p>
<p>CNBC is really terrible.  My life and trading has been better since turning it off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark mchugh</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/cnbcs-dylan-ratigan-to-abc/comment-page-2/#comment-157994</link>
		<dc:creator>mark mchugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22683#comment-157994</guid>
		<description>Oh come on now,  CNBC is stacked with talent, like......um......well, there&#039;s always......don&#039;t forget about.......got it, Michelle Caruso-Cabrera (she&#039;s stacked, anyway).

I&#039;ll follow Dylan wherever he lands.  It was nice to have a voice that shared the common man&#039;s outrage.  Maybe he can take Faber with him, they seem to be the only one&#039;s interested in reporting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on now,  CNBC is stacked with talent, like&#8230;&#8230;um&#8230;&#8230;well, there&#8217;s always&#8230;&#8230;don&#8217;t forget about&#8230;&#8230;.got it, Michelle Caruso-Cabrera (she&#8217;s stacked, anyway).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll follow Dylan wherever he lands.  It was nice to have a voice that shared the common man&#8217;s outrage.  Maybe he can take Faber with him, they seem to be the only one&#8217;s interested in reporting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EAR</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/cnbcs-dylan-ratigan-to-abc/comment-page-2/#comment-157982</link>
		<dc:creator>EAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22683#comment-157982</guid>
		<description>Chris Whalen Says:
March 28th, 2009 at 9:35 am

&quot;It is pretty clear to me that CNBC is drinking the Kool Aid when it comes to the crisis. The coverage on CNBC is becoming more pro-Obama, pro-regime every day. I can see why CNBC executives were uncomfortable with Dylan because they are so busy kissing up to Obama et al. It is really quite amazing. I predict that Larry Kudlow, other conservative “holdovers” from the GOP period will be out of CNBC before year-end. &#039;The times they are a changing…&#039;&quot;
StatArb Says:

March 28th, 2009 at 9:46 am

Chris Whalen —

&quot;true enough , and hiring Donny Deutsch’s liberal view was the first broadside to the Free Marketers

the Messiah is here and we all need to kneel before him now&quot;

No.. not true... at all. What are you drinking while you watch CNBC? I hope you&#039;re drinking or smoking something to come to the conclusion that the network is now pro-O and the conservatives are now under siege. This is more expedient delusion and it&#039;s getting tedious. As much as you need feel like it is, this isn&#039;t some sort of indiscriminate and wanton liberal takeover. You aren&#039;t witnessing a revolution where one dogma is trying to eviscerate the other taking anyone who protests down with it. And you definitely aren&#039;t pragmatic outside observers of a messiah led movement blindly followed by legions of people less savvy than you.

It&#039;s simple, people want a new perspective. A new approach. The GOP has had plenty of time in power in the past three decades to perfect the Union and make the world a better place, how&#039;d they do? It&#039;s a change of direction that was forced by an unsustainable path. This is the danger of pointing or wagging you finger at liberals or conservatives or whatever. If you&#039;ve picked a side, come up with constructive, intelligent ideas that reflect a pure dedication to the label you choose to apply to yourself. Otherwise, you&#039;ve joined the choir of complainers, the sound of those who have nothing to say is deafening these days. 

Ratigan is a smart and charismatic dude who made CNBC&#039;s most enjoyable show pop and occasionally made MBart squirm, both good things. But he was pompous, his interview questions were too long and leading and I thought he should have donned a powdered wig with all of his soapboxin&#039;.

Next thing he does will probably be good but his initial move in his next endeavor should be to acknowledge his participation in the environment he now assails.  

With that said, I have to agree with ben22.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Whalen Says:<br />
March 28th, 2009 at 9:35 am</p>
<p>&#8220;It is pretty clear to me that CNBC is drinking the Kool Aid when it comes to the crisis. The coverage on CNBC is becoming more pro-Obama, pro-regime every day. I can see why CNBC executives were uncomfortable with Dylan because they are so busy kissing up to Obama et al. It is really quite amazing. I predict that Larry Kudlow, other conservative “holdovers” from the GOP period will be out of CNBC before year-end. &#8216;The times they are a changing…&#8217;&#8221;<br />
StatArb Says:</p>
<p>March 28th, 2009 at 9:46 am</p>
<p>Chris Whalen —</p>
<p>&#8220;true enough , and hiring Donny Deutsch’s liberal view was the first broadside to the Free Marketers</p>
<p>the Messiah is here and we all need to kneel before him now&#8221;</p>
<p>No.. not true&#8230; at all. What are you drinking while you watch CNBC? I hope you&#8217;re drinking or smoking something to come to the conclusion that the network is now pro-O and the conservatives are now under siege. This is more expedient delusion and it&#8217;s getting tedious. As much as you need feel like it is, this isn&#8217;t some sort of indiscriminate and wanton liberal takeover. You aren&#8217;t witnessing a revolution where one dogma is trying to eviscerate the other taking anyone who protests down with it. And you definitely aren&#8217;t pragmatic outside observers of a messiah led movement blindly followed by legions of people less savvy than you.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s simple, people want a new perspective. A new approach. The GOP has had plenty of time in power in the past three decades to perfect the Union and make the world a better place, how&#8217;d they do? It&#8217;s a change of direction that was forced by an unsustainable path. This is the danger of pointing or wagging you finger at liberals or conservatives or whatever. If you&#8217;ve picked a side, come up with constructive, intelligent ideas that reflect a pure dedication to the label you choose to apply to yourself. Otherwise, you&#8217;ve joined the choir of complainers, the sound of those who have nothing to say is deafening these days. </p>
<p>Ratigan is a smart and charismatic dude who made CNBC&#8217;s most enjoyable show pop and occasionally made MBart squirm, both good things. But he was pompous, his interview questions were too long and leading and I thought he should have donned a powdered wig with all of his soapboxin&#8217;.</p>
<p>Next thing he does will probably be good but his initial move in his next endeavor should be to acknowledge his participation in the environment he now assails.  </p>
<p>With that said, I have to agree with ben22.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rileyx67</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/cnbcs-dylan-ratigan-to-abc/comment-page-2/#comment-157829</link>
		<dc:creator>rileyx67</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22683#comment-157829</guid>
		<description>Agree with those disappointed, and my Yellow Lab Molly shares the same.  Had always given her a biscuit at 3pm (Central), and decided to see if she&#039;d alert to the closing bell, so began &quot;de-muting&quot; as approached.  Within a couple days, she got the association, but then after a few more, she began sitting up and staring at Dylan&#039;s closing just before the bell.  Never interested in Animal Planet, but a huge fan of Dylan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with those disappointed, and my Yellow Lab Molly shares the same.  Had always given her a biscuit at 3pm (Central), and decided to see if she&#8217;d alert to the closing bell, so began &#8220;de-muting&#8221; as approached.  Within a couple days, she got the association, but then after a few more, she began sitting up and staring at Dylan&#8217;s closing just before the bell.  Never interested in Animal Planet, but a huge fan of Dylan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben22</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/cnbcs-dylan-ratigan-to-abc/comment-page-2/#comment-157824</link>
		<dc:creator>ben22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22683#comment-157824</guid>
		<description>for me.

this isn&#039;t news, who cares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for me.</p>
<p>this isn&#8217;t news, who cares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/cnbcs-dylan-ratigan-to-abc/comment-page-2/#comment-157816</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22683#comment-157816</guid>
		<description>A fantastic radio interview with Dylan Ratigan here... about 15 minutes long.   MUST listen too.   No wonder he didn&#039;t see eye with CNBC.   Was done on Feb 7th, 2009

http://www.fedupusa.info/Dylan_Ratigan_Interview.mp3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fantastic radio interview with Dylan Ratigan here&#8230; about 15 minutes long.   MUST listen too.   No wonder he didn&#8217;t see eye with CNBC.   Was done on Feb 7th, 2009</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fedupusa.info/Dylan_Ratigan_Interview.mp3" rel="nofollow">http://www.fedupusa.info/Dylan_Ratigan_Interview.mp3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/cnbcs-dylan-ratigan-to-abc/comment-page-2/#comment-157802</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22683#comment-157802</guid>
		<description>MR--

with this: http://www.us-analytics.com/index.php/practices-home-menu

as a starting point, and key words: Data Mining/Data Warehousing, Analytics, Self-Aware Networks, Genetic Algorithms, Facial Recognition Systems, CCTV, Biometrics, Petaflop speed parallel processing

for starters,  forget it, you can fake the &#039;chip&#039;, you can&#039;t fake the other ~10 inputs..

this: http://www.gpsdaily.com/reports/New_GPS_Satellite_Declared_Operational_For_Users_Worldwide_999.html
should give intro, enough, to understand why Lockheed-Martin is heavily pimpin&#039; &quot;Smart Grids&quot;, as well..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MR&#8211;</p>
<p>with this: <a href="http://www.us-analytics.com/index.php/practices-home-menu" rel="nofollow">http://www.us-analytics.com/index.php/practices-home-menu</a></p>
<p>as a starting point, and key words: Data Mining/Data Warehousing, Analytics, Self-Aware Networks, Genetic Algorithms, Facial Recognition Systems, CCTV, Biometrics, Petaflop speed parallel processing</p>
<p>for starters,  forget it, you can fake the &#8216;chip&#8217;, you can&#8217;t fake the other ~10 inputs..</p>
<p>this: <a href="http://www.gpsdaily.com/reports/New_GPS_Satellite_Declared_Operational_For_Users_Worldwide_999.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.gpsdaily.com/reports/New_GPS_Satellite_Declared_Operational_For_Users_Worldwide_999.html</a><br />
should give intro, enough, to understand why Lockheed-Martin is heavily pimpin&#8217; &#8220;Smart Grids&#8221;, as well..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabbadoo32</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/cnbcs-dylan-ratigan-to-abc/comment-page-2/#comment-157796</link>
		<dc:creator>sabbadoo32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22683#comment-157796</guid>
		<description>This leaves Steve Leisman and Deutch as the only non-brain dead left at CNBC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This leaves Steve Leisman and Deutch as the only non-brain dead left at CNBC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MRegan</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/cnbcs-dylan-ratigan-to-abc/comment-page-2/#comment-157792</link>
		<dc:creator>MRegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22683#comment-157792</guid>
		<description>MH-

Well, I am bummed out. ; )

If you can tag &#039;em, you can fake the tags, I suppose. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MH-</p>
<p>Well, I am bummed out. ; )</p>
<p>If you can tag &#8216;em, you can fake the tags, I suppose. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

