<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Show vs CNBC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/daily-show-vs-cnbc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/daily-show-vs-cnbc/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:03:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/daily-show-vs-cnbc/comment-page-2/#comment-151368</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 06:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20881#comment-151368</guid>
		<description>Just about the funniest bit of financial humor that I&#039;ve ever seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just about the funniest bit of financial humor that I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dss</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/daily-show-vs-cnbc/comment-page-2/#comment-151259</link>
		<dc:creator>dss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 20:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20881#comment-151259</guid>
		<description>Santelli is not an honorable man.  He knows his stuff about the bond market, but otherwise he is just like all the  rest of the millionaire reporters/anchors/pundits (otherwise known as Republican shills) that inhabit and pollute CNBC.  They are even more insidious than Fox News as they push their corporatist and self serving propaganda by interviewing the various shameless crooks that got us into this position parading their knowledge to influence the suckers that watch the show.   Pump and dump in it&#039;s finest form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Santelli is not an honorable man.  He knows his stuff about the bond market, but otherwise he is just like all the  rest of the millionaire reporters/anchors/pundits (otherwise known as Republican shills) that inhabit and pollute CNBC.  They are even more insidious than Fox News as they push their corporatist and self serving propaganda by interviewing the various shameless crooks that got us into this position parading their knowledge to influence the suckers that watch the show.   Pump and dump in it&#8217;s finest form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How the Common Man Sees It</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/daily-show-vs-cnbc/comment-page-2/#comment-151086</link>
		<dc:creator>How the Common Man Sees It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20881#comment-151086</guid>
		<description>Jester:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jester

Blogs actually come close to that function as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jester:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jester" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jester</a></p>
<p>Blogs actually come close to that function as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeDude</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/daily-show-vs-cnbc/comment-page-2/#comment-151070</link>
		<dc:creator>DeDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20881#comment-151070</guid>
		<description>“John Boehner says that Obama is using the stimulus bill to distribute $500 million dollars worth of condoms to people who should simply obstain from sexual intercourse”

Yes, theres a strategy that has proven itself not to work -so lets ignore the facts and follow the bankrupt GOP ideology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“John Boehner says that Obama is using the stimulus bill to distribute $500 million dollars worth of condoms to people who should simply obstain from sexual intercourse”</p>
<p>Yes, theres a strategy that has proven itself not to work -so lets ignore the facts and follow the bankrupt GOP ideology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeDude</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/daily-show-vs-cnbc/comment-page-2/#comment-151067</link>
		<dc:creator>DeDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20881#comment-151067</guid>
		<description>Mark D

What you were citing from Jim Cramer is called putting up a straw man (claiming someone want to do something or said something that they did not).  He also is using cheap demagoguery to make himself look better at the cost of taking a real look at the facts and helping explain complicated matters to his simple audience.  If you are so upset about sophomoric behaviour I don’t understand how you can drag out someone like Cramer as a hero.  Or is is just that you get upset when the sophomoric behaviour is aimed at your side of the political spectrum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark D</p>
<p>What you were citing from Jim Cramer is called putting up a straw man (claiming someone want to do something or said something that they did not).  He also is using cheap demagoguery to make himself look better at the cost of taking a real look at the facts and helping explain complicated matters to his simple audience.  If you are so upset about sophomoric behaviour I don’t understand how you can drag out someone like Cramer as a hero.  Or is is just that you get upset when the sophomoric behaviour is aimed at your side of the political spectrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeDude</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/daily-show-vs-cnbc/comment-page-2/#comment-151062</link>
		<dc:creator>DeDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20881#comment-151062</guid>
		<description>MarkD

Identifying the hypocrites and ideologogs is actually a very important part of coming to the right policies.  Nobody with a real dayjob have time to tjek out all the “presumed” facts that are being thrown at them.  However, I know that anything coming from e.g., Rush is not trustworthy because he again and again has been exposed as a lyer and a hypocrit.  When we can get away from basing discussions on something said on CNBC and instead base it on something said by people like Roubini we have gotten a far step towards finding real solutions - and that requires exposure og the false profets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MarkD</p>
<p>Identifying the hypocrites and ideologogs is actually a very important part of coming to the right policies.  Nobody with a real dayjob have time to tjek out all the “presumed” facts that are being thrown at them.  However, I know that anything coming from e.g., Rush is not trustworthy because he again and again has been exposed as a lyer and a hypocrit.  When we can get away from basing discussions on something said on CNBC and instead base it on something said by people like Roubini we have gotten a far step towards finding real solutions &#8211; and that requires exposure og the false profets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogue Medic</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/daily-show-vs-cnbc/comment-page-2/#comment-151033</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogue Medic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20881#comment-151033</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I will let y’all in on a little secret: TDS bookers and writers are regulars here at TBP . . .&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;ll keep you on your best behavior when they are around. :-)

@MarkDD975,

Jon Stewart is in the entertainment business. Not in the way that CNBC is - pretending to provide substance, while just trying to entertain viewers. His does not even make a pretense at providing unbiased information. Too bad Rush Limbaugh and Michael Moore are not as honest about their attempts at entertainment. Jon Stewart is a comedian. This video is funny, unless you are blinded by a need to be serious all of the time. 

If Republicans are feeling unfairly targeted by a comedy show, perhaps that should give you an idea of how many people view their platform. We didn&#039;t lose the cold war because of Lenny Bruce. &lt;i&gt;Lighten up, Francis&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I will let y’all in on a little secret: TDS bookers and writers are regulars here at TBP . . .</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;ll keep you on your best behavior when they are around. <img src='http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@MarkDD975,</p>
<p>Jon Stewart is in the entertainment business. Not in the way that CNBC is &#8211; pretending to provide substance, while just trying to entertain viewers. His does not even make a pretense at providing unbiased information. Too bad Rush Limbaugh and Michael Moore are not as honest about their attempts at entertainment. Jon Stewart is a comedian. This video is funny, unless you are blinded by a need to be serious all of the time. </p>
<p>If Republicans are feeling unfairly targeted by a comedy show, perhaps that should give you an idea of how many people view their platform. We didn&#8217;t lose the cold war because of Lenny Bruce. <i>Lighten up, Francis</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d4winds</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/daily-show-vs-cnbc/comment-page-2/#comment-151028</link>
		<dc:creator>d4winds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 10:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20881#comment-151028</guid>
		<description>Stewart absolutely nails it--and is hilarious doing it.  This is even funnier than the SNL stuff during the election.  CNBC is getting Palinized.  Couldn&#039;t happen to a more competent crew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stewart absolutely nails it&#8211;and is hilarious doing it.  This is even funnier than the SNL stuff during the election.  CNBC is getting Palinized.  Couldn&#8217;t happen to a more competent crew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boomer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/daily-show-vs-cnbc/comment-page-2/#comment-151025</link>
		<dc:creator>Boomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 09:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20881#comment-151025</guid>
		<description>&quot;Really stupid of Santelli to refuse to come on the show. That way they get to frame the issues, and nail him to whatever wall they want&quot;

Actually the real reason it was stupid was because it left some witty guys 8 minutes of TV time to fill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Really stupid of Santelli to refuse to come on the show. That way they get to frame the issues, and nail him to whatever wall they want&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually the real reason it was stupid was because it left some witty guys 8 minutes of TV time to fill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dps</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/daily-show-vs-cnbc/comment-page-2/#comment-151001</link>
		<dc:creator>dps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 04:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20881#comment-151001</guid>
		<description>@mark
For someone who &quot;doesn&#039;t care&quot; what they say on CNBC you sure seem to care a lot about what&#039;s said on CNBC - and The Comedy Channel. THE COMEDY CHANNEL!  Do you get it yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mark<br />
For someone who &#8220;doesn&#8217;t care&#8221; what they say on CNBC you sure seem to care a lot about what&#8217;s said on CNBC &#8211; and The Comedy Channel. THE COMEDY CHANNEL!  Do you get it yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
