<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/evolution/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:52:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jbruso</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-153978</link>
		<dc:creator>jbruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21501#comment-153978</guid>
		<description>Pretty picture, but I have a hard time reconciling it with  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity; Sorta like a pretty picture of how the financial system ought to work in theory, but then in practice, whoa, we discover systemic risk and black swans... so we reach the conclusion we need to design a better system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty picture, but I have a hard time reconciling it with  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity</a>; Sorta like a pretty picture of how the financial system ought to work in theory, but then in practice, whoa, we discover systemic risk and black swans&#8230; so we reach the conclusion we need to design a better system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dow</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-153687</link>
		<dc:creator>Dow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21501#comment-153687</guid>
		<description>Avl Dao...take a closer look at the graphic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avl Dao&#8230;take a closer look at the graphic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avl Dao</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-153596</link>
		<dc:creator>Avl Dao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 01:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21501#comment-153596</guid>
		<description>Lost in most discussions of terran evolton are the assorted asteroid hits that pretty much wiped the slate clean 3 (?)  times.  So there&#039;s actually not a good linear progression from the original set of tiny single-cell ocean beasties to post-asteroid plants and animal life to dinosaurs to post-asteroid mammals to primates.

Had not those asteroids re-set stuff practically to zero (never quite to zero) multiple times, who knows what would have evolved from the original set of micro-organisms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost in most discussions of terran evolton are the assorted asteroid hits that pretty much wiped the slate clean 3 (?)  times.  So there&#8217;s actually not a good linear progression from the original set of tiny single-cell ocean beasties to post-asteroid plants and animal life to dinosaurs to post-asteroid mammals to primates.</p>
<p>Had not those asteroids re-set stuff practically to zero (never quite to zero) multiple times, who knows what would have evolved from the original set of micro-organisms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg0658</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-152826</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg0658</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21501#comment-152826</guid>
		<description>where is the monkey line leading to the humans ... with the flying saucer impregnating the Neanderthals with intellect and space voyage instinct

a chicken .. wheres the egg ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where is the monkey line leading to the humans &#8230; with the flying saucer impregnating the Neanderthals with intellect and space voyage instinct</p>
<p>a chicken .. wheres the egg ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gloppie</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-152758</link>
		<dc:creator>gloppie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21501#comment-152758</guid>
		<description>I wonder what it would look like in French....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what it would look like in French&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deanscamaro</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-152644</link>
		<dc:creator>deanscamaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21501#comment-152644</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see in the cycle where this generation has taken us back to the beginning.  Something is missing from the cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see in the cycle where this generation has taken us back to the beginning.  Something is missing from the cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
