<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Historic P/E Ratio for the S&amp;P 500</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/historic-pe-ratio-for-the-sp-500/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/historic-pe-ratio-for-the-sp-500/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:06:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Curly</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/historic-pe-ratio-for-the-sp-500/comment-page-1/#comment-161621</link>
		<dc:creator>Curly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 01:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20834#comment-161621</guid>
		<description>By downloading the accompanying table/spreadsheet and adding a columns for the 2yr simple moving average (SMA) of the P/E ratio and 10*Log of the S&amp;P 500 price, I plotted 2yr SMA and 10log Price by date.  Interestingly, market timing using sharp reversals of the P/E  SMA over the last 82 years was nearly ideal with 11 periods in and out of the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By downloading the accompanying table/spreadsheet and adding a columns for the 2yr simple moving average (SMA) of the P/E ratio and 10*Log of the S&amp;P 500 price, I plotted 2yr SMA and 10log Price by date.  Interestingly, market timing using sharp reversals of the P/E  SMA over the last 82 years was nearly ideal with 11 periods in and out of the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbruso</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/historic-pe-ratio-for-the-sp-500/comment-page-1/#comment-151878</link>
		<dc:creator>jbruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20834#comment-151878</guid>
		<description>This is a perfect chart. Very telling.

What would you all say is an appropriate P/E ratio for the S&amp;P now given future earnings expectations?

10? 8?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a perfect chart. Very telling.</p>
<p>What would you all say is an appropriate P/E ratio for the S&amp;P now given future earnings expectations?</p>
<p>10? 8?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasRas</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/historic-pe-ratio-for-the-sp-500/comment-page-1/#comment-151324</link>
		<dc:creator>JasRas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20834#comment-151324</guid>
		<description>Fleckenstein said in the 2000-2003 markets that Greenspan&#039;s actions were only delaying the ultimate direction and destination that the markets would go...  I remember him saying that when he was commentating on Realmoney.  And he said the delay would cause more pain.  2 for 2...  It&#039;s all come true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fleckenstein said in the 2000-2003 markets that Greenspan&#8217;s actions were only delaying the ultimate direction and destination that the markets would go&#8230;  I remember him saying that when he was commentating on Realmoney.  And he said the delay would cause more pain.  2 for 2&#8230;  It&#8217;s all come true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftback</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/historic-pe-ratio-for-the-sp-500/comment-page-1/#comment-151170</link>
		<dc:creator>leftback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20834#comment-151170</guid>
		<description>It is very revealing.
2000, not 2007 was really 1929.  It&#039;s later than many people think.

More compression in store chaps, look at the late 30s and the 70s.
The 70s really were a bitch, weren&#039;t they??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very revealing.<br />
2000, not 2007 was really 1929.  It&#8217;s later than many people think.</p>
<p>More compression in store chaps, look at the late 30s and the 70s.<br />
The 70s really were a bitch, weren&#8217;t they??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Nola</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/historic-pe-ratio-for-the-sp-500/comment-page-1/#comment-151061</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Nola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=20834#comment-151061</guid>
		<description>Says it all about the &quot;wisdom of the market.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Says it all about the &#8220;wisdom of the market.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
