<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Math &amp; Physics versus Wall Street</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/math-physics-versus-wall-street/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/math-physics-versus-wall-street/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:59:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ben22</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/math-physics-versus-wall-street/comment-page-1/#comment-152413</link>
		<dc:creator>ben22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21367#comment-152413</guid>
		<description>@LB

It wasn&#039;t just the hedge funds that used the quants to get money from suckers, check out the Ameriprise &quot;Active Portfolio&#039;s&quot; fund of funds line up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@LB</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t just the hedge funds that used the quants to get money from suckers, check out the Ameriprise &#8220;Active Portfolio&#8217;s&#8221; fund of funds line up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jojo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/math-physics-versus-wall-street/comment-page-1/#comment-152410</link>
		<dc:creator>Jojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21367#comment-152410</guid>
		<description>Wired magazine has a good Quant article this month:

WIRED MAGAZINE: 17.03
Recipe for Disaster: The Formula That Killed Wall Street
By Felix Salmon Email 02.23.09

In the mid-&#039;80s, Wall Street turned to the quants--brainy financial engineers--to invent new ways to boost profits. Their methods for minting money worked brilliantly... until one of them devastated the global economy.

http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-03/wp_quant

ALSO

WIRED MAGAZINE: 17.03

Road Map for Financial Recovery: Radical Transparency Now!
By Daniel Roth Email 02.23.09

The financial world doesn&#039;t need new regulations. It needs radical transparency.

http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-03/wp_reboot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wired magazine has a good Quant article this month:</p>
<p>WIRED MAGAZINE: 17.03<br />
Recipe for Disaster: The Formula That Killed Wall Street<br />
By Felix Salmon Email 02.23.09</p>
<p>In the mid-&#8217;80s, Wall Street turned to the quants&#8211;brainy financial engineers&#8211;to invent new ways to boost profits. Their methods for minting money worked brilliantly&#8230; until one of them devastated the global economy.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-03/wp_quant" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-03/wp_quant</a></p>
<p>ALSO</p>
<p>WIRED MAGAZINE: 17.03</p>
<p>Road Map for Financial Recovery: Radical Transparency Now!<br />
By Daniel Roth Email 02.23.09</p>
<p>The financial world doesn&#8217;t need new regulations. It needs radical transparency.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-03/wp_reboot" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-03/wp_reboot</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arogersb</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/math-physics-versus-wall-street/comment-page-1/#comment-152404</link>
		<dc:creator>arogersb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21367#comment-152404</guid>
		<description>Check the book Inventing Money, the story behind LTCM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check the book Inventing Money, the story behind LTCM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/math-physics-versus-wall-street/comment-page-1/#comment-152397</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21367#comment-152397</guid>
		<description>Because the i-bankers and hedge funds could use the quants to con inwestors out of their cash.
2 and 20 baby. it’s all about the fees…

not more complex than that, nice sum, lb..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the i-bankers and hedge funds could use the quants to con inwestors out of their cash.<br />
2 and 20 baby. it’s all about the fees…</p>
<p>not more complex than that, nice sum, lb..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftback</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/math-physics-versus-wall-street/comment-page-1/#comment-152389</link>
		<dc:creator>leftback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21367#comment-152389</guid>
		<description>&quot;One wonders why quants were useful to i-banks and hedge funds?&quot;

Because the i-bankers and hedge funds could use the quants to con inwestors out of their cash.
2 and 20 baby. it&#039;s all about the fees...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One wonders why quants were useful to i-banks and hedge funds?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because the i-bankers and hedge funds could use the quants to con inwestors out of their cash.<br />
2 and 20 baby. it&#8217;s all about the fees&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/math-physics-versus-wall-street/comment-page-1/#comment-152369</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21367#comment-152369</guid>
		<description>Beefy, 

they never made The List:

A Fine Balance by Rohinton Mistry 
fiction

Fall on Your Knees by Ann-Marie MacDonald 
fiction

The Corrections by Johnathan Franzen 
audio cassette fiction, fiction

Cane River by Lalita Tademy 
fiction

Stolen Lives - 20 Years in a Desert Jail by Malika Oufkir and Michele Fitousi 
365.45 OUF

Icy Sparks by Gwyn Hyman Rubio 
Compact Disc Fiction, fiction 

We Were the Mulvaneys by Joyce Carol Oates 
fiction

House of Sand and Frog by Andre Dubus III 
fiction, large print fiction

Drowning Ruth by Christina Schwarz 
fiction

Open House by Elizabeth Berg 
fiction, large print fiction

...
http://www.neptunepubliclibrary.org/oprah.htm
~~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beefy, </p>
<p>they never made The List:</p>
<p>A Fine Balance by Rohinton Mistry<br />
fiction</p>
<p>Fall on Your Knees by Ann-Marie MacDonald<br />
fiction</p>
<p>The Corrections by Johnathan Franzen<br />
audio cassette fiction, fiction</p>
<p>Cane River by Lalita Tademy<br />
fiction</p>
<p>Stolen Lives &#8211; 20 Years in a Desert Jail by Malika Oufkir and Michele Fitousi<br />
365.45 OUF</p>
<p>Icy Sparks by Gwyn Hyman Rubio<br />
Compact Disc Fiction, fiction </p>
<p>We Were the Mulvaneys by Joyce Carol Oates<br />
fiction</p>
<p>House of Sand and Frog by Andre Dubus III<br />
fiction, large print fiction</p>
<p>Drowning Ruth by Christina Schwarz<br />
fiction</p>
<p>Open House by Elizabeth Berg<br />
fiction, large print fiction</p>
<p>&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.neptunepubliclibrary.org/oprah.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.neptunepubliclibrary.org/oprah.htm</a><br />
~~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Beefy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/math-physics-versus-wall-street/comment-page-1/#comment-152363</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Beefy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21367#comment-152363</guid>
		<description>Quick question - shouldn&#039;t these books have been read when they came out?  It would seem that their ideas would have been more effective ex ante.  :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick question &#8211; shouldn&#8217;t these books have been read when they came out?  It would seem that their ideas would have been more effective ex ante.  <img src='http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph.price</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/math-physics-versus-wall-street/comment-page-1/#comment-152343</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph.price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21367#comment-152343</guid>
		<description>sorry about the spelling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry about the spelling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph.price</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/math-physics-versus-wall-street/comment-page-1/#comment-152342</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph.price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21367#comment-152342</guid>
		<description>steel breeze:

Economists where useful to banks and hedge funds in the same way priests were useful to the feudal aristocracy. The quants were the alter boys - getting everything organised and occasionally submitting to a vigourous rogering</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>steel breeze:</p>
<p>Economists where useful to banks and hedge funds in the same way priests were useful to the feudal aristocracy. The quants were the alter boys &#8211; getting everything organised and occasionally submitting to a vigourous rogering</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steel breeze</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/math-physics-versus-wall-street/comment-page-1/#comment-152315</link>
		<dc:creator>steel breeze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=21367#comment-152315</guid>
		<description>joseph.price Says: 
March 10th, 2009 at 11:16 am

&lt;i&gt; As a physicist who used to work in a US investment bank (until it went bankrupt in spectacular style), my view is that the tools of physics are very poorly suited to the world of finance. &lt;/i&gt;

This is a view that Emmanuel Derman also shares in his book ( #4 in Barry&#039;s list ).

One wonders why quants were useful to i-banks and hedge funds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joseph.price Says:<br />
March 10th, 2009 at 11:16 am</p>
<p><i> As a physicist who used to work in a US investment bank (until it went bankrupt in spectacular style), my view is that the tools of physics are very poorly suited to the world of finance. </i></p>
<p>This is a view that Emmanuel Derman also shares in his book ( #4 in Barry&#8217;s list ).</p>
<p>One wonders why quants were useful to i-banks and hedge funds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
