Bernanke Pushes the Button

Email this post Print this post
By Jack McHugh - March 18th, 2009, 10:20PM

Good Evening: After months of threats, the Fed finally pushed the monetization button. Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke and the rest of the FOMC decided today to embark upon the one strategy central bankers have always considered the dreaded last option — Quantitative Easing. It’s one thing for the Fed to push the “Easy” button and lower rates or temporarily inject reserves into the banking system, but to push the “QE” button (creating currency out of thin air with which to purchase assets) is an action reserved for only the direst of circumstances. If such a device truly existed in the Board room of the Eccles building, it would be a red button under glass with a “Press Only in Case of Emergency” warning stenciled underneath. That market participants responded to this monetary jolt by buying stocks, bonds, and precious metals while thumping the dollar is not a surprise. How investors react over the longer term to these actions and the inevitable unintended consequences will be far less easy to predict.

Prior to the Fed’s announcement, most markets were fidgeting around not too far from unchanged. Stocks had digested this morning’s economic data (an uptick in both CPI and mortgage applications, plus a drop in the current account deficit) and managed to recover from early losses of 1% or more in the major averages. When the FOMC statement hit the wires (for the complete text, see below), the S&P 500 soared 3% and briefly topped resistance at the 800 level. For those keeping score at home, today’s high of 803 represents a gain of 20% over the 8 trading days since the low set on March 6. Feeling suddenly a bit winded, the major averages spent the final hour trying to consolidate the gains. By day’s end, the Dow’s 1.25% gain lagged behind, while the Russell 2000′s 3.5% advance led the pack.

The reaction to the Fed’s policy change in the other markets was much more volatile. Treasury notes and bonds saw furious short-covering and yields plunged by amounts not seen in 47 years (see below). Carry traders, mortgage duration hedgers, and liquidators of double short Treasury ETFs all jostled and elbowed each other to grab whatever Treasury coupons they could find. When the electronic dust inside the trading screens had settled, yields were down a staggering 22 bps (2 year) to 47 bps (10 year). In sympathy with Treasury yields, the dollar also precipitously fell. The prospect of hundreds of billions of newly minted dollars coursing through the global financial system caused currency traders to thrash the greenback by almost 3%. Gold, the currency no central bank can print, switched places with the buck in going from the outhouse to the penthouse. The yellow metal was down some 4% while the FOMC was meeting, but it closed with gains of nearly the same magnitude once it became clear the Fed was pushing the monetization button. The rest of the commodity complex was oddly out of step and went the other way. Despite the surge in metals both precious and base, the CRB index actually retreated by 1.2%.

Many months and a couple of thousand Dow points ago, I predicted that the credit crisis would eventually deepen to the point where the Fed would feel forced to step in and directly purchase a variety of assets instead of merely financing the assets held by others. I said a the time that “Helicopter Ben” Bernanke would live up to his nickname and live out the actions outlined during his famous 2002 speech about the options at the Fed’s disposal for fighting deflation once fed funds had already reached the zero barrier. Wall Street analysts had come to much the same conclusion prior to this week’s Fed gathering, but none (including this writer) foresaw the Bernanke Fed undertaking such broad and sweeping actions so soon. Most of us thought the FOMC would continue its recent pattern of gradual mission creep, incorrectly thinking that the Fed might announce some limited asset purchases (if any).

As Bank of America-Merrill Lynch economist, David Rosenberg, details below, however, today’s policy change is nothing short of Quantitative Easing (see below). The Fed is “now bringing out all the ammo in its arsenal”, according to Rosenberg. Treasury purchases ($300 billion), a huge expansion of MBS buying ($750 billion), a doubling of GSE debt purchases ($100 billion), and hints the TALF will buy distressed assets from banks will expand the Fed’s balance sheet by at least another 50%, says Mr. Rosenberg. He also points out that the Fed’s balance sheet will now grow to become 25% of GDP, an eye-popping level that should end all questions of whether or not we are like Japan during the decade just past. And, for those who think the time is ripe for upping their equity allocations, Mr. Rosenberg would like to remind them of what happened to buyers of the Nikkei 225 after Quantitative Easing was tried in Japan. Longs were treated to a 20% rally that lasted six weeks before stocks set new lows just four months later. Ultimately, predicts Rosenberg, QE helps bond buyers more than stock buyers.

Unlike Mr. Rosenberg and his prescription to unload stocks and buy Treasurys, I’m less certain about how all this will play out. With a low savings rate and high external debts, the U.S. of 2009 is very different from the savings rich Japan of the 1990′s. The key will be how the U.S. dollar reacts now that Mr. Bernanke has pushed the button. If the world’s creditors are willing to look the other way as the Fed buys every asset it can lay its hands upon, I can see how Mr. Bernanke’s latest policy moves could succeed in speeding up an eventual recovery for our economy. But since I doubt dollar holders will sit idly by as the paper they hold shrinks in value, I see a quick and happy resolution as being a low probability event. Then again, other central banks (the BOE & SNB) are engaging in the same currency-busting policies, so it’s not altogether clear whether the world’s fiat currency system can survive a war of attrition. I remain comfortable owning precious metals and shares of the companies that mine them because of this very uncertainty.

We’ve arrived at this unfortunate juncture in our nation’s financial history because of reckless behavior in both New York and Washington D.C. Interest rates were too often kept too low, lending standards were whittled away until they were non existent, and borrowing too much for one’s own good (both corporate and personal) reached the point where it carried no negative stigma. Our nation’s elected officials consistently spent far more than was collected in tax revenue and our nation’s regulators were so poor they wouldn’t have been able to cut it as mall cops.

We learned nothing from the foreshadowing events brought about by the reckless behavior on display at Long Term Capital, Enron, and WorldCom. Bill Fleckenstein neatly summed up the last 15 years in one his best-ever Raps back in January of this year. Anticipating today’s events, Bill wrote, “…initially, in the late 1990′s, we attempted to speculate our way to prosperity via the stock bubble. And then, when that didn’t work, we attempted to borrow our way to prosperity during the real estate bubble. Of course, those two ended the way they did, in an epic disaster, and now we’re trying to print our way to prosperity…” Well said, Bill. Let us all hope the U.S. experiment with pushing the button on Quantitative Easing is more successful for us than it was for the Japanese. But given all the behavior that brought us to this point, we will need to be both lucky and good from this point forward.

– Jack McHugh

U.S. Stocks Gain, 10-Year Treasury Yields Fall Most Since 1962

U.S. Federal Open Market Committee March 18 Statement: Text

U.S. Considers Expanding TALF to Include Distressed Assets

Bernanke buys bonds.pdf

A conversation about AIG

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 18th, 2009, 9:49PM


34:11

A conversation about AIG with Hank Greenberg former chairman and CEO of AIG, Carol Loomis Senior editor-at-large of “Fortune”, Gretchen Morgenson of “The New York Times” and Meredith Whitney

Charlie Rose, March 17, 2009

Open Thread: Fed Driving Rates Much Lower

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 18th, 2009, 8:01PM

Buy a third of a trillion in treasuries, and watch rates plummet.

That is the Fed’s obvious goal.

The mere announcement sent rates plummeting: Yields on the 10-year note plunged to 2.48% from 3.01% late yesterday. Bloomberg noted this as the biggest decline since 1962.

Not surprisingly, the dollar got whacked and gold rallied.

~~~

Is this a smart idea? Will we see mortgage rates at 4.5% ? What will this do inflation? The Dollar? Gold? Equities? Economic activity?

What say ye?

Fire !

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 18th, 2009, 6:30PM

This from a friend of mine. There is lots of anger out there.

When a fireman sees a house on fire, he sounds an alarm, dons his turnout gear, bravely rescues the occupants and puts out the fire.

When an investment banker sees a house on fire, he quietly sells the burning house short, uses the proceeds to buy a larger house for himself and, when someone suggests that his taxes be raised to help the homeless, he rails against the dangers of socialism.

Madoff’s Prison Twitter Page

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 18th, 2009, 4:30PM

This is too damn funny!

>

via Jeans Blog

Hedge Funds May Get AIG Cash

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 18th, 2009, 4:02PM


2:45

WSJ, MARCH 18, 2009

Some of the billions of dollars that the U.S. government paid to bail out American International Group Inc. stand to benefit hedge funds that bet on a falling housing market, according to people familiar with the matter and documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

The documents show how Wall Street banks were middlemen in trades with hedge funds and AIG that left the giant insurer holding the bag on billions of dollars of assets tied to souring mortgages. AIG has put in escrow some money for at least one major bank, Deutsche Bank AG, whose hedge-fund clients made bets …

FOMC Statement

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 18th, 2009, 2:30PM

Federal Reserve Press Release

Release Date: March 18, 2009

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in January indicates that the economy continues to contract.  Job losses, declining equity and housing wealth, and tight credit conditions have weighed on consumer sentiment and spending.  Weaker sales prospects and difficulties in obtaining credit have led businesses to cut back on inventories and fixed investment.  U.S. exports have slumped as a number of major trading partners have also fallen into recession.  Although the near-term economic outlook is weak, the Committee anticipates that policy actions to stabilize financial markets and institutions, together with fiscal and monetary stimulus, will contribute to a gradual resumption of sustainable economic growth.

In light of increasing economic slack here and abroad, the Committee expects that inflation will remain subdued.  Moreover, the Committee sees some risk that inflation could persist for a time below rates that best foster economic growth and price stability in the longer term.

In these circumstances, the Federal Reserve will employ all available tools to promote economic recovery and to preserve price stability.  The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and anticipates that economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period.  To provide greater support to mortgage lending and housing markets, the Committee decided today to increase the size of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet further by purchasing up to an additional $750 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities, bringing its total purchases of these securities to up to $1.25 trillion this year, and to increase its purchases of agency debt this year by up to $100 billion to a total of up to $200 billion.  Moreover, to help improve conditions in private credit markets, the Committee decided to purchase up to $300 billion of longer-term Treasury securities over the next six months.  The Federal Reserve has launched the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility to facilitate the extension of credit to households and small businesses and anticipates that the range of eligible collateral for this facility is likely to be expanded to include other financial assets.  The Committee will continue to carefully monitor the size and composition of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet in light of evolving financial and economic developments.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Elizabeth A. Duke; Charles L. Evans; Donald L. Kohn; Jeffrey M. Lacker; Dennis P. Lockhart; Daniel K. Tarullo; Kevin M. Warsh; and Janet L. Yellen.

The Biggest A.I.G. Counterparties

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 18th, 2009, 11:45AM

>

Source:
A.I.G.’s Bailout Priorities Are in Critics’ Cross Hairs
GRETCHEN MORGENSON
NYT March 17, 2009

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/18/business/18aig.html

Time for Wall Street Insurance?

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 18th, 2009, 10:34AM

Why does the US taxpayer have to guarantee every single transaction done on Wall Street? Since when is that our obligation?

If the taxpayer is on the hook to bailout systemic risk, then don’t they have the right to prevent that systemic risk? Or alternatively, reserve for/insure it?

I keep hearing that Wall Street must be free to innovate, to engineer, to create new products — but other than iShares and ETFs, I cant say I’ve seen much in the way of brilliant insights or creativity.

Here is the thing that really gets me angry about all of this nonsensical “innovation” on Wall Street talk: Its a misnomer. This innovation without oversight is in reality has led to an enormous transfer of wealth – first from shareholders to senior executives, then from taxpayers to bankrupt firms and their counter-parties. The entire industry has been hijacked by a few rogue finance engineers, and its been an utter disaster.

Consider the FDIC: They are the insurer of bank deposits of $100k (now $250k), and in the event they run out of money, they can go to the taxpayer. But they pay for themselves via a small insurance premium banks pay (on behalf of depositors) on every account.

All of the trillions of dollars in bailout expense plus the blather about restricting innovation has led me to this unfortunate conclusion:  We need Wall Street Insurance.

In order to pay for the next round of disasters some 20 years hence, we need to set up a a reserved insurance fund. This means every transaction, M&A, IPO, bond under-writing, stock trade, CDO, CDS, every RMBS, etc has a 1% premium on it.

That should add up to a few trillion dollars, and by the time the next debacle comes along, we can afford to pay for it.

Bernanke Capital Management

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - March 18th, 2009, 9:15AM

With the FOMC’s main function of adjusting the fed funds rate pretty much at full throttle with no more to do, the Bernanke Capital hedge fund (with Geithner his new partner as Paulson cashed out) that it is now will tell us what other assets they may or may not buy and/or lend to.

The TALF begins tomorrow with the pricing of a $1.3b Nissan auto loan deal and we’ll get their thoughts on buying Treasuries, the possibility of which is an elephant in the room.

The Fed’s plan to buy mortgages has helped to lower mortgage rates as the MBA said the average 30 yr rate this week matched the lowest level since at least 1990 at 4.89% but it has done virtually nothing to spur purchases as it remains just 9% off its lowest level since 2000. Lower house prices have brought out the buyers. Refi’s did rise 29.6% and has been the only beneficiary of lower rates. ABC confidence rose 1 pt to the highest since the 1st week of Oct.

~~~

Feb CPI rose .4% headline, .1% more than expected and rose .2% core, also .1% more than estimated. The y/o/y gain is .2% up from flat in Jan, the lowest since 1955, led by energy. The core rate is up 1.8% y/o/y. With oil prices bottoming out as are food prices, which I believe is for good in this cycle, inflation #’s are starting to reverse to the upside. The degree of course will determine the Fed’s next conundrum.

Owners equivalent rent rose .1% and continues to remain subdued due to job losses and competition from unsold homes that are put up for rent. Boosting the core rate was a 1.3% increase in apparel prices and a .5% rise in vehicle prices.

Bottom line, with the rapid decline in commodity prices since July, inflation worries quickly receded and gave the market a respite from that perspective (as we then shifted our worries to the economy) but the disinflation seen may be running out of steam and will most likely not lead to deflation.

44 queries. 1.074 seconds.