Public-Private Investment Program

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 23rd, 2009, 7:17AM

Later today, we get the gritty details about the latest bank rescue plan. In the WSJ, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner details his new toxic asset disposal program.

It is now nearly 18 months since the crisis erupted, and we are several trillion dollars into this, with little to show except a halting of sheer panic. The thought process seems to be, what’s another trillion dollars between friends?

Regular readers know my preferences: Nationalize the banks, eliminate the debt, clear out the toxic assets without saddling taxpayers with absurd costs.

Here is some of the specifics via Geithner:

“The Public-Private Investment Program will purchase real-estate related loans from banks and securities from the broader markets. Banks will have the ability to sell pools of loans to dedicated funds, and investors will compete to have the ability to participate in those funds and take advantage of the financing provided by the government.

The funds established under this program will have three essential design features. First, they will use government resources in the form of capital from the Treasury, and financing from the FDIC and Federal Reserve, to mobilize capital from private investors. Second, the Public-Private Investment Program will ensure that private-sector participants share the risks alongside the taxpayer, and that the taxpayer shares in the profits from these investments. These funds will be open to investors of all types, such as pension funds, so that a broad range of Americans can participate.

Third, private-sector purchasers will establish the value of the loans and securities purchased under the program, which will protect the government from overpaying for these assets.

The new program starts at $500 billion dollar,s and ramps up to $1 trillion dollars. Creating a market for these thinly traded hard to value assets is harder than it appears. Hence, the massive outlay of cash.

>

Previously:
Nationalize Now (January 26th, 2009)

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/nationalize-now/

Sources:
My Plan for Bad Bank Assets
TIMOTHY GEITHNER
WSJ, MARCH 23, 2009

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123776536222709061.html

Details on Public Private Partnership Investment Program
Treasury Department, March 23, 2009

http://treasury.gov/press/releases/tg65.htm

Read the rest of this entry »

Obama on 60 Minutes

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 23rd, 2009, 6:08AM

The 60 Minutes interview of President Obama by Steve Kroft:


Watch CBS Videos Online


Watch CBS Videos Online

US Futures Higher: Dow 212+

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 23rd, 2009, 5:50AM

Good Monday Morning. Looks like we have green on the screen this morning, with markets recovering from Friday’s sell off in the early going.

Asian markets were up huge: The Nikkei 225 had gains of 3.39%, the Hang Seng Index up 4.78%, and the S&P/ASX 200 Index tacking on 2.44%.

Nothing like the prospect a trillion giveaway to get the animal spirits moving . . .

>

The Week Ahead 3/23/2009

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 23rd, 2009, 2:00AM

A busy week of data and hearings in Washington, with new and existing home sales highlighting the economic indicators. A final reading of fourth quarter gross domestic product is expected show even more weakness.

The Week Ahead In The United States

~~~
The Week Ahead in Asia

A number of Chinese companies will report earnings next week, including PetroChina, CNOOC, Sinopec, Bank of China and China Telecom. Taiwan’s central bank may cut interest rates on Thursday. MarketWatch’s Polya Lesova reports.

~~~

The Week Ahead in Europe

Retailers will be in focus in Europe, with Metro, H&M and Sainsbury all posting earnings. MarketWatch’s Aude Lagorce reports.

3/20/2009

Understanding Lehman & AIG

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 22nd, 2009, 1:26PM

A quick Bailout Nation excerpt:

The decision to allow Lehman Brothers to go belly up has been roundly criticized by many people as a mistake that cost AIG dearly. That turns out to be an incorrect conclusion, a classic causation versus correlation error. It is much more accurate to observe that the same factors that drove Lehman into bankruptcy also drove AIG to the brink.

It began with rates so low that everyone in the nation decided they wanted a house (and the bigger, the better). This included many people who could not afford one. So these folk applied for mortgages from a new kind of lender, one that operated with little regulation and even less supervision. These lenders were able to give loans to these people – bad credit risks, too little income, no equity – due to their unique business model. They could ignore traditional lending standards because they did not plan on holding these mortgages very long; They could specialize in higher commission sub-prime loans because they were “lend–to-securitize” originators. They made higher risk loans, then flipped them to Wall Street firms, who repackaged them into complex mortgage backed securities. These same investment banks had too little capital and used too much leverage, but that didn’t stop them from buying too much of this paper from each other. It didn’t matter much anyway, since it was rated triple AAA rated by S&P and Moody’s, so there wasn’t anything to worry about. Underlying all of these transactions was the assumption that home prices in the USA never went down. Oh, and, this entire series of events took place at a time when the dominant political philosophy was that it was impossible for this to go wrong . . . the self-regulating markets, you understand, would see to that.

What bad could possibly come of that?

Indeed . . .

Words from the (investment) wise March 22, 2009

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 22nd, 2009, 12:15PM

Words from the (investment) wise for the week that was (March 16 – 22, 2009)

Phew – what a week! What an announcement!

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) on Wednesday left the Fed funds range unchanged at zero to 0.25%, but stunned the financial markets with an announcement that it would purchase up to $300 billion in longer-term Treasuries over the next six months.

Acting boldly in an attempt to get the economy breathing again, the policy board also committed to purchasing up to an additional $750 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities, bringing its total purchases of these securities to up to $1.25 trillion this year, as well as a further $100 billion in agency debt.

The objective of purchasing Treasuries is to orchestrate a reduction in long-term rates in the expectation that these lower rates would filter through to mortgage rates and other private sector loans. The average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage fell to 4.98% on Thursday, down from 5.47% in early December and a high of 6.46% in mid-October (see Freddie Mac‘s weekly survey).

“They’re calling it ‘The Rambo Fed‘,” said Richard Russell (Dow Theory Letters). “Bernanke is not fooling around any longer. He’s playing all his cards. He’s going to put a floor under housing and boost asset prices in an all-out attack on the bear market. Bernanke will in no way accept deflation. The Fed will go all out in printing Federal Reserve Notes in its massive assault on deflation. Bernanke will accept a collapsing dollar rather than a repeat of the Great Depression.”

22-mrt-v1.jpg

“These actions are high-quality bond-friendly and dollar-unfriendly,” commented Bill Gross of Pimco (via Reuters). “To the extent that they are successful and Treasury efforts match these efforts, certain risk assets may benefit as well, although their ultimate prices will reflect the ability of government to successfully reflate.”

On the announcement, the yield on the US ten-year Treasury Note recorded its sharpest fall since the Wall Street crash of 1987, the US dollar suffered its biggest weekly loss for almost 25 years, gold bullion surged by more than $80 at one stage, and oil and base metals gained handsomely.

The performance of the major asset classes is summarized by the chart below, courtesy of StockCharts.com.

22-mrt-v2.jpg

Stock markets initially rose strongly on the Fed’s move to revive the economy, adding to the gains of the rally that commenced on March 10. Although stocks succumbed to profit-taking towards the close, indices nevertheless managed to register a second straight week of gains – the first such stretch since May 2008 in the case of the US bourses.

22-mrt-v3.jpg

Elsewhere in the world stocks also performed strongly, with the MSCI World Index gaining 4.4% (YTD -14.2%) and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index ahead by 4.7% (YTD -2.5%). Returns ranged from +17.7% in the case of Romania to -5.6% for Bermuda. The Shanghai Composite Index (+7.2%) had another solid week and remains at the top of the field for the year to date with a 25.0% gain in US dollar terms. (Click here to access a complete list of global stock market movements, in local currency terms, as supplied by Emeginvest.)

As far as US exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are concerned, John Nyaradi (Wall Street Sector Selector) reports that the strongest sectors this week were energy, commodities and emerging markets. Leaders included SPDR S&P Oil and Gas Exploration (XOP) (+7.6%), PowerShares Commodity Tracking Index (DBC) (+9.4%) and iShares MSCI South Korea Index (EWY) +7.5%. On the other end of the performance spectrum Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) stocks had a torrid time, with SPDR DJ Wilshire REIT (RWR) losing 12.3% and Vanguard REIT (VNQ) down by 10.3%.

Notwithstanding supply concerns and a US budget deficit expected to hit $1.8 trillion this year, government bond yields around the globe declined as the US central bank joined the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan and the Swiss National Bank in a policy of quantitative easing. Yields of 10-year Treasuries and Bunds were down by 22 and 5 basis points respectively on the week. However, the yield on the 10-year Gilt rose by 7 basis points even as the Bank of England continued to buy long-dated bonds.

“… I think the US government bond market is a disaster waiting to happen for the simple reason that the requirements of the government to cover its fiscal deficit will be very, very high,” said Marc Faber in a CNBC interview. “There will be a time when the Federal Reserve will have to increase interest rates to fight inflation, and it will be reluctant to do so because the cost of servicing government debt will rise substantially.”

Not surprisingly, the US dollar got whacked. According to Bespoke, the US Dollar Index had its third biggest one-day decline (-2.69%) on Wednesday since daily pricing started back in 1970. The greenback broke below its 50-day moving average and short-term uptrend, but is still trading above its 200-day moving average and longer-term uptrend. Given the Fed’s “nuclear” strategy, further damage appears likely.

22-mrt-v4.jpg

Source: StockCharts.com

In the expectation that the Fed’s printing of massive amounts of money will stoke inflationary pressures, Treasury Inflation-protected Securities (TIPS) surged to a level last seen in October 2009, as shown by the performance of iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP).

22-mrt-v5.jpg

Source: StockCharts.com

Bernanke’s “inflate or die” approach also caused gold bullion to shine. After having traded below $884 prior to the Fed’s announcement, the yellow metal rose sharply to $967 before easing back to close the week at $952.

Read the rest of this entry »

Investigating AIG

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 22nd, 2009, 8:24AM

Everyone seems to be all abuzz about the Mike Taibbi takedown of AIG in Rolling Stone. Its a fun read — as is any piece that begins “we’re officially, royally fucked” — but there are a few other columns that do an excellent job contextualizing 1) How AIG got so heavily involved in CDOs and CDSs, and 2) What its going to take to clean up the ginormous mess they made.

If you are interested in learning the nitty gritty details about how AIG’s Financial Product division (AIGFP as it came to be known), then the place to start reading is the 3 part series WaPo did in the fall: Investigating AIG (full linkage below).

The clean up half of the story is best described by Carol Loomis in this month’s Fortune. (She makes it pretty clear that Liddy is not the bad guy).

Get crackin’ . . .

Investigating AIG: The Washington Post
Part I: The Beautiful Machine
Part 2: A Crack in the System
Part 3: Downgrades and Downfalls

AIG’s rescue has a long way to go
Carol J. Loomis
Fortune DECEMBER 29, 2008: 10:46 AM ET

http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/23/news/companies/AIG_150bailout_Loomis.fortune/index.htm

Behind Insurer’s Crisis, Blind Eye to a Web of Risk
GRETCHEN MORGENSON
The New York Times, September 27, 2008

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/28/business/28melt.html

The Big Takeover
MATT TAIBBI
Rolling Stone Mar 19, 2009 12:49 PM

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/26793903/the_big_takeover

WAMU Sues FDIC for $6.5 Billion

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 21st, 2009, 11:30PM

Now ain’t this a bitch?

Washington Mutual’s holding company is suing federal regulators for billions of dollars, saying the firesale of the bank’s assets to JPMorgan Chase violated its rights. The lawsuit was filed Friday in federal court against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which seized the Seattle-based savings and loan in September. It was the largest bank failure in U.S. history.

Lawyers for the holding company, Washington Mutual Inc., argue that the bank was worth more than the $1.9 billion JPMorgan paid for it in a deal arranged by the FDIC. The lawsuit argues that if WaMu’s assets had been liquidated prudently, they would have been worth more than that.
An FDIC spokesman did not immediately return a call seeking comment Saturday.

At what point do you just liquidate every last one of these sons of bitches — and throw their management in jail?

>

Sources:
Washington Mutual sues FDIC for over $13 billion
Reuters, Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:49pm EDT

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE52K1K620090321

WaMu holding company sues FDIC over bank seizure
AP, Sat Mar 21, 7:05 pm ET

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090321/ap_on_bi_ge/wamu_lawsuit

Solving the Housing Crisis

Email this post Print this post
By John Mauldin - March 21st, 2009, 6:34PM

This last Tuesday the Wall Street Journal published an op-ed by my friend Gary Shilling and Richard LeFrak. They offer a simple solution for the housing crisis: give foreigners who will come to the US and buy a home resident status (green cards). This is a very important proposal and one that deserves national attention and action. Gary was kind enough to send me two lengthier white papers offering more facts. In this week’s letter we are going to look at this proposal in more detail than the small space that an op-ed can offer. And while this letter will be somewhat controversial in some circles, I ask that you read it through, giving me the time to make the case. I will also add a few thoughts as to why this could not only help solve the housing crisis, but help put the nation back into growth mode.

Long-time readers know that I have been growing more and more bearish of late. I have been writing for a long time that we are in for a long period of slow Muddle Through growth as the twin crises of the
housing bubble and credit bubbles require time to heal. Today we look at a serious proposal for cutting the time to healing for at least one of those bubbles (housing), and at least keep the other (credit) from getting worse. This is the most serious idea I have seen that could actually make a realpositive contribution to the economy and help put us back on a growth path.

I will post Gary’s papers and a link to the actual op-ed piece for those who want to do further research, but let me make one point at the beginning that he did not emphasize: the US is already allowing roughly 1 million immigrants a year into the country (which for a variety of reasons I and most serious economists of all stripes believe is a very good thing). We are suggesting that we simply change the nature of what constitutes the conditions for acceptance, so as to jump start the housing industry and the economy. We are not suggesting additional immigrants, although nothing would be wrong with that. I will also post a link for you to send this e-letter to your congressmen and senators.

Read the rest of this entry »

A Lynch Mob!

Email this post Print this post
By David Kotok - March 21st, 2009, 12:27PM

David R. Kotok co-founded Cumberland Advisors in 1973 and has been its Chief Investment Officer since inception. He holds a B.S. in Economics from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, an M.S. in Organizational Dynamics from The School of Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania, and a Masters in Philosophy from the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Kotok’s articles and financial market commentary have appeared in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, and other publications. He is a frequent contributor to CNBC programs. Mr. Kotok is also a member of the National Business Economics Issues Council (NBEIC), the National Association for Business Economics (NABE), the Philadelphia Council for Business Economics (PCBE), and the Philadelphia Financial Economists Group (PFEG).

~~~

A Lynch Mob!
March 21, 2009

“Let’s go hang ‘em.”

American history is replete with examples of lynch mobs taking control of a situation and inflicting injustice. In the end most lynch mobs have dealt harmful blows to society. Congressional action to punish AIG employees over the bonus issue is already seeding that outcome.

Members of the US House of Representatives who voted for this bill said they were reacting to the anger of their constituents. In failing to show leadership they have just undermined the entire structure designed to repair the financial system.

Specifically the House did the following:

1. They licensed the abrogation of contracts. Their message is simply that it makes no difference what rules we put into effect now; we can and will change them so you cannot depend on them. Global businesses take heed: Your previous judgment about the sanctity of US law has been rendered faulty by our political leadership.

2. They passed retroactive taxation. Their message is that, whatever you plan with regard to the federal tax code, do not assume consistency and do not build any reliability about your government into your decision making. We, in Congress, can reverse our laws and confiscate your results.

3. They made the tax punitive. A 90% tax on something is like taking all of it. The chairman (Rangel) of the House taxation committee actually admitted that by taxing the 90% he was leaving the remainder for the states. In other words, states are now encouraged to engage in the same form of behavior.

Sure citizens are outraged over the $165 million in bonus payments to AIG staff. But they should direct their outrage at the Congress and not threaten the employees or their families with personal injury. The Congress authorized these payments; Dodd, Geithner, and Obama Administration personnel admitted that. Remember, the law passed without giving anyone the chance to testify in public hearings and without allowing comment on the draft legislation. When the law originally went through the Congress, the House leadership suppressed amendments. This Barney Frank and Nancy Pelosi-led House is especially guilty of ignoring the rule of law. They are now guilty of encouraging the rule of lynch mob.

The result of this House action is already damaging. The federal regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has shown the courage to ask that this law not be advanced in the Senate. We expect to hear more from those federal personalities who have the strength to speak up and oppose this House-approved proposal.

But depending on the Senate to soften the law or depending on the US Supreme Court to overturn it is a dangerous strategy. Some Congressmen admitted privately that they voted in favor because of constituent pressure, even though they were really opposed to the concept. They voted “yes” because they were relying on the Senate or the courts to say “no.”

Some damage is already done. Firms that were gearing up to participate in the federal program to be announced this coming week are considering withdrawal. They fear that any action which puts them into the federal assistance plan will subject them to the chance of retroactive punishment and taxation. The House has undermined the so-called public-private partnership designed to help restore financing of consumer items like automobiles and credit cards. We expect that the participation in the program to be announced this coming week will be tepid at best.

At Cumberland, we are advising institutional clients to take great care when engaging in any form of activity with the federal government. Simply put: a lynch mob can turn on you in a second and cannot be trusted. The risk is now very high.

Other firms that are already acting with TARP monies, or other federal monies for that matter, are seeking ways to deleverage and exit. In the entrepreneurial and risk-taking business and financial community the universal response to this act by Congress is outrage and distrust and disgust.

So far President Obama is silent on this lynch-mob approach. He has yet to declare himself against it.

Obama needs to be reminded of a parallel in history. A century ago a man named Leo Frank was lynched in Georgia for a murder he did not commit. Local politicians supported the lynch mob; those courageous politicians that opposed it were voted down. Frank was an innocent victim. His subsequent posthumous pardon did not undo the harm.

A century later a man named Barney Frank brags about the earmarks he obtained for his Congressional district (see his website). This modern Frank foments the modern-day version of a lynch mob. The House of Representatives and the Financial Services Committee under the leadership of Barney Frank have made the first day of spring, 2009 a sad day for America. They suppressed the rule of law; they chose the rule of the lynch mob; they are now going to have to live with that result.

When the citizens of America realize what the House has done, they may redirect the lynch mob against the Congress. That is coming next. As Yogi Berra said: “This ain’t over till it’s over.”

~~~

We fly to Europe in a few hours and will chair the Global Interdependence Center delegation at the Paris conference next week (see www.interdependence.org ). Meetings will include central bankers, global investors, and businessmen. Our private roundtable will now also address this House action and what it means for US policy and American markets. Current scheduling from Paris includes CNBC on Monday at 10 AM New York time and again on CNBC on Tuesday morning at 5 AM New York time.

David R. Kotok, Chairman and Chief Investment Officer, email: david.kotok@cumber.com

46 queries. 1.069 seconds.