<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PPIP: Pricing Still the Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/ppip-pricing-still-the-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/ppip-pricing-still-the-issue/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:46:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg0658</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/ppip-pricing-still-the-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-156855</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg0658</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22401#comment-156855</guid>
		<description>pss - another thread .. Growth via Less Waste via Time Element
concentrate investing in items that have a longer life expectancy
such as a power plant (25 years) versus a tv show (1 second)

America has adopted show business song and dance as a mainstay
&quot;a waste is a terrible thing to mind&quot; .. JoJo . still love that slap upside the head</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pss &#8211; another thread .. Growth via Less Waste via Time Element<br />
concentrate investing in items that have a longer life expectancy<br />
such as a power plant (25 years) versus a tv show (1 second)</p>
<p>America has adopted show business song and dance as a mainstay<br />
&#8220;a waste is a terrible thing to mind&#8221; .. JoJo . still love that slap upside the head</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg0658</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/ppip-pricing-still-the-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-156832</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg0658</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22401#comment-156832</guid>
		<description>still love reading this blog .. lol .. slaps and jabs and all

From a workin man who invests in free market capitalism via time and energy buying stuff to produce my product with ... I hope y&#039;all figure how to bring it all back in line ... I hope my President Obama and past State Senator gets a handle on the game you all play . so I can survive without playing the game you love to play . cause I find your game revolting . necessary . but still the same

that was background to mention another necessary to worry about .. property taxes to balance these printagiveaways juicing the economy as we knew it .. I am sure as anyone . who takes care of who with its muscle
_____
ps - BR I need a thread to add juice to the World Currency idea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still love reading this blog .. lol .. slaps and jabs and all</p>
<p>From a workin man who invests in free market capitalism via time and energy buying stuff to produce my product with &#8230; I hope y&#8217;all figure how to bring it all back in line &#8230; I hope my President Obama and past State Senator gets a handle on the game you all play . so I can survive without playing the game you love to play . cause I find your game revolting . necessary . but still the same</p>
<p>that was background to mention another necessary to worry about .. property taxes to balance these printagiveaways juicing the economy as we knew it .. I am sure as anyone . who takes care of who with its muscle<br />
_____<br />
ps &#8211; BR I need a thread to add juice to the World Currency idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rktbrkr</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/ppip-pricing-still-the-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-156829</link>
		<dc:creator>rktbrkr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22401#comment-156829</guid>
		<description>Stiglitz: “Quite frankly, this amounts to robbery of the American people

Toxic assets plan a robbery: Stiglitz

25/03/2009

The US government plan to rid banks of toxic assets will rob American taxpayers by exposing them to too much risk and is unlikely to work as long as the economy remains weak, according to Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz.
“The Geithner plan is very badly flawed,” Stiglitz said on the sidelines of a Credit Suisse Asian investment conference in Hong Kong yesterday.

US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s plan to wipe up to US$1 trillion (HK$7.8 trillion) in bad debt off banks’ balance sheets, unveiled on Monday, offered “perverse incentives,” Stiglitz said. Washington is basically using the taxpayer to guarantee against downside risk on the value of these assets, while giving the upside to private investors, he said.

“Quite frankly, this amounts to robbery of the American people. I don’t think it’s going to work because I think there’ll be a lot of anger about putting the losses so much on the shoulder of the American taxpayer.”

Even if the plan clears banks of massive toxic debt, worries about the economic outlook mean banks could still be unwilling to make fresh loans, while the prospect of a higher tax burden to pay for various government stimulus plans could further undermine US consumers, he said.

Some Republican lawmakers have also expressed concern over the incentives offered by the government, which could end up providing private investors with more than 90 percent of the funds to buy the troubled assets. But President Barack Obama has said the plan was critical to economic recovery.

Barclays Capital, meanwhile, says the success of the Geithner plan depends on a recovery in house prices.

For the plan to work, house prices need to stop declining, said Chotaro Morita</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stiglitz: “Quite frankly, this amounts to robbery of the American people</p>
<p>Toxic assets plan a robbery: Stiglitz</p>
<p>25/03/2009</p>
<p>The US government plan to rid banks of toxic assets will rob American taxpayers by exposing them to too much risk and is unlikely to work as long as the economy remains weak, according to Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz.<br />
“The Geithner plan is very badly flawed,” Stiglitz said on the sidelines of a Credit Suisse Asian investment conference in Hong Kong yesterday.</p>
<p>US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s plan to wipe up to US$1 trillion (HK$7.8 trillion) in bad debt off banks’ balance sheets, unveiled on Monday, offered “perverse incentives,” Stiglitz said. Washington is basically using the taxpayer to guarantee against downside risk on the value of these assets, while giving the upside to private investors, he said.</p>
<p>“Quite frankly, this amounts to robbery of the American people. I don’t think it’s going to work because I think there’ll be a lot of anger about putting the losses so much on the shoulder of the American taxpayer.”</p>
<p>Even if the plan clears banks of massive toxic debt, worries about the economic outlook mean banks could still be unwilling to make fresh loans, while the prospect of a higher tax burden to pay for various government stimulus plans could further undermine US consumers, he said.</p>
<p>Some Republican lawmakers have also expressed concern over the incentives offered by the government, which could end up providing private investors with more than 90 percent of the funds to buy the troubled assets. But President Barack Obama has said the plan was critical to economic recovery.</p>
<p>Barclays Capital, meanwhile, says the success of the Geithner plan depends on a recovery in house prices.</p>
<p>For the plan to work, house prices need to stop declining, said Chotaro Morita</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/ppip-pricing-still-the-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-156791</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22401#comment-156791</guid>
		<description>joe the trader Says: 

&quot;For that matter individual investors should be allowed to participate, but that would make it clear how large the subsidy is.&quot;

&quot;but that would make it clear how large the subsidy is.&quot;

yes, quite, it is that transparent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joe the trader Says: </p>
<p>&#8220;For that matter individual investors should be allowed to participate, but that would make it clear how large the subsidy is.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;but that would make it clear how large the subsidy is.&#8221;</p>
<p>yes, quite, it is that transparent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ginger</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/ppip-pricing-still-the-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-156772</link>
		<dc:creator>ginger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22401#comment-156772</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know enough of Doug Kass&#039;s history to make a determination- but you&#039;re saying Kass was early with his bearish call, and I know for a fact that he called THE bottom on Citigroup at $23 !! Yes, $23 last year he was running around saying the banks were finished going down &amp; were great buys ( I remember because I got sucked in by it!) - so it sure looks like the man is always REALLY early - and being $22 too early on C sure hurts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know enough of Doug Kass&#8217;s history to make a determination- but you&#8217;re saying Kass was early with his bearish call, and I know for a fact that he called THE bottom on Citigroup at $23 !! Yes, $23 last year he was running around saying the banks were finished going down &amp; were great buys ( I remember because I got sucked in by it!) &#8211; so it sure looks like the man is always REALLY early &#8211; and being $22 too early on C sure hurts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KidDynamite</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/ppip-pricing-still-the-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-156763</link>
		<dc:creator>KidDynamite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22401#comment-156763</guid>
		<description>glad you guys enjoyed my posts on the subject.

yeah - i wonder how much the American public would love this plan if they understood it.  It&#039;s as confusing as hell, even for people who know what they&#039;re doing.

and to Barry&#039;s point in this post - the plan does little to solve the problem of the market wanting to pay 30c and the banks asking 80c... this leverage won&#039;t fix that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>glad you guys enjoyed my posts on the subject.</p>
<p>yeah &#8211; i wonder how much the American public would love this plan if they understood it.  It&#8217;s as confusing as hell, even for people who know what they&#8217;re doing.</p>
<p>and to Barry&#8217;s point in this post &#8211; the plan does little to solve the problem of the market wanting to pay 30c and the banks asking 80c&#8230; this leverage won&#8217;t fix that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Nola</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/ppip-pricing-still-the-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-156756</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Nola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22401#comment-156756</guid>
		<description>ottovbvs and Mannwich:  What Kass says are necessary, but not sufficient conditions.

Yeah, the banks have to be recapitalized. Will that get them lending again? Not necessarily. See Krugman&#039;s recent column about despair and his comments on the videos Barry posted today. Just because the banks get into a position where they can lend doesn&#039;t mean a boom. They need customers who want to borrow and are creditworthy; those won&#039;t appear til recovery.

Of course financial stocks have improved;  they can hardly get worse. And, they are being subsidized out the wazoo. How will they act when the government teat is withdrawn?

Commodities are rising because China is stocking up and because they were so far down, a bounce can be expected. It doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that there is growth. In fact, I plan on buying some SMN after the optimism from the plan starts to fade. 

Barry pretty well rebutted the housing bottom baloney in the MSM in his previous post.

Emerging markets? The will improve if they think we are going to buy their stuff again. Federal attempts to reinflate the bubble will raise hopes. China&#039;s economic stats are notably unreliable and have actually been worrisome if you read Michael Pettis blogs, which are mysteriously being blocked by China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ottovbvs and Mannwich:  What Kass says are necessary, but not sufficient conditions.</p>
<p>Yeah, the banks have to be recapitalized. Will that get them lending again? Not necessarily. See Krugman&#8217;s recent column about despair and his comments on the videos Barry posted today. Just because the banks get into a position where they can lend doesn&#8217;t mean a boom. They need customers who want to borrow and are creditworthy; those won&#8217;t appear til recovery.</p>
<p>Of course financial stocks have improved;  they can hardly get worse. And, they are being subsidized out the wazoo. How will they act when the government teat is withdrawn?</p>
<p>Commodities are rising because China is stocking up and because they were so far down, a bounce can be expected. It doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that there is growth. In fact, I plan on buying some SMN after the optimism from the plan starts to fade. </p>
<p>Barry pretty well rebutted the housing bottom baloney in the MSM in his previous post.</p>
<p>Emerging markets? The will improve if they think we are going to buy their stuff again. Federal attempts to reinflate the bubble will raise hopes. China&#8217;s economic stats are notably unreliable and have actually been worrisome if you read Michael Pettis blogs, which are mysteriously being blocked by China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mannwich</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/ppip-pricing-still-the-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-156717</link>
		<dc:creator>Mannwich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22401#comment-156717</guid>
		<description>@otto:  I like Kass.  Reading his articles in &#039;05&#039;-&#039;06 is what led me to believe something was going to go horribly amiss in the housing market and then wider economy.  His articles actually led me to dig deeper and ultimately find Barry&#039;s site (which then led me to CR, Naked Capitalism, Paul Kedrosky, Mish et al).  However, if I recall correctly, Kass was early with his bearish calls, which leads me to believe he&#039;ll be early here as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@otto:  I like Kass.  Reading his articles in &#8217;05&#8242;-&#8217;06 is what led me to believe something was going to go horribly amiss in the housing market and then wider economy.  His articles actually led me to dig deeper and ultimately find Barry&#8217;s site (which then led me to CR, Naked Capitalism, Paul Kedrosky, Mish et al).  However, if I recall correctly, Kass was early with his bearish calls, which leads me to believe he&#8217;ll be early here as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe the trader</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/ppip-pricing-still-the-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-156716</link>
		<dc:creator>joe the trader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22401#comment-156716</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how Geithner can sell this massive subsidy to a few investors in the current environment. Who wouldn&#039;t want a thirteen to one bet? For that matter individual investors should be allowed to participate, but that would make it clear how large the subsidy is. 
In addition, I completely agree on the pricing issue. As a piece of anecdotal evidence. I enquired about refinancing my home a few days ago. When I was asked how much I thought the home was worth I gave an answer that was 25% less than what home was appraised at in 2006--which was probably 20% above the true 2006 level. So in other words my &quot;guess&quot; is probably overstated by 25%. To my surprise the banking associate at the other end of the phone was amazed at how closely my guess matched his estimate...dear god. So I am sure that bank still has my loan, it is marked at par and that they are  assuming there is considerable positive equity in the house, when I think the equity is flat at best. Moreover, I am sure the bank has no idea that I am unemployed. So my bid for my loan...65.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how Geithner can sell this massive subsidy to a few investors in the current environment. Who wouldn&#8217;t want a thirteen to one bet? For that matter individual investors should be allowed to participate, but that would make it clear how large the subsidy is.<br />
In addition, I completely agree on the pricing issue. As a piece of anecdotal evidence. I enquired about refinancing my home a few days ago. When I was asked how much I thought the home was worth I gave an answer that was 25% less than what home was appraised at in 2006&#8211;which was probably 20% above the true 2006 level. So in other words my &#8220;guess&#8221; is probably overstated by 25%. To my surprise the banking associate at the other end of the phone was amazed at how closely my guess matched his estimate&#8230;dear god. So I am sure that bank still has my loan, it is marked at par and that they are  assuming there is considerable positive equity in the house, when I think the equity is flat at best. Moreover, I am sure the bank has no idea that I am unemployed. So my bid for my loan&#8230;65.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottovbvs</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/ppip-pricing-still-the-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-156676</link>
		<dc:creator>ottovbvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22401#comment-156676</guid>
		<description>The Curmudgeon Says: 

March 24th, 2009 at 1:21 pm 
“And btw just cut the profane insults….it’s just not necessary”

Then learn how to read

......That&#039;s not the problem....the problem is you don&#039;t always realize the implications of what you&#039;re saying.....and when it&#039;s pointed out you can&#039;t respond in an adult way.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Curmudgeon Says: </p>
<p>March 24th, 2009 at 1:21 pm<br />
“And btw just cut the profane insults….it’s just not necessary”</p>
<p>Then learn how to read</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;That&#8217;s not the problem&#8230;.the problem is you don&#8217;t always realize the implications of what you&#8217;re saying&#8230;..and when it&#8217;s pointed out you can&#8217;t respond in an adult way&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

