Should AIG have Been Bailed Out?

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 26th, 2009, 12:00PM

Comments

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

One Response to “Should AIG have Been Bailed Out?”

  1. FromLori Says:

    Ah Hindsight just think how we all would be so much better off if??? The better question would be is do we continue to bail them out? I say NO WAY!!

    CAN ANYONE TELL USE WHAT THE DANGER OF AIG REALLY IS?

    They no longer pose a Systemic Risk, We are BROKE! Fraud was prevalent in this whole mess to begin with and I don’t see any of them in prison orange, I want to know why not?

    How big are they?

    http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/archives/2008/10/the_size_of_der.php

    No longer a systemic risk here…

    http://features.csmonitor.com/economyrebuild/2009/03/22/can-us-let-aig-fail/

    It was a giant fraudulant ponzi scheme to begin with let them take their licks they will bankrupt us otherwise!

    Fraud here..

    http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/engdahl/2009/0318.html

    Public Risk here..

    http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Public-has-more-risk-public/story.aspx?guid={3C374173-407C-4A88-9D76-436ECEE6116E}

48 queries. 0.354 seconds.