Stock markets: Relief rally or new bull?

Email this post Print this post
By Prieur du Plessis - March 11th, 2009, 7:15AM

Stock markets: Relief rally or new bull?

I said the following in my “Words from the Wise” post on Sunday: “At this juncture, short-term movements are almost impossible to predict, although the sell-off over the past few days – a capitulation in some respects – could nourish the long-awaited tradeable rally. Also, Lowry’s 90% down-days, like we experienced on Monday and Thursday, are often followed by two- to seven-day bounces.”

Global equities surged yesterday as investors adopted a more positive view of the prospects for the banking sector and shrugged aside gloom about the economy. The reversal in fortune is illustrated by the strong gains of the MSCI World Index and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index of 5.3% and 3.6% respectively.

In the US, the S&P 500 Index (+6.4%) experienced its biggest one-day gain since November 21 as financial shorts were covered and “sidelined cash” was deployed, resulting in a long-absent 90% up-day.

The surge in prices again raises the question: was yesterday THE bottom? Before getting too far ahead of ourselves, Bespoke highlights the fact that yesterday’s gain was the eighth one-day gain of 5% or more since the S&P 500 peaked in October 2007. None of the previous occasions resulted in a sustained rally as shown by the graph below.

12-mrt-1.jpg

Given the fact that the rally occurred against a level of extremely bearish sentiment and that the oversold market has probably started exhausting itself (at least in the short term with the S&P 500 having seen only three up-days over the 16 trading days prior to yesterday), a rally may be in bloom. Should we see higher prices over the next week or so, the more important question will be whether we are dealing with anything more than an oversold bounce.

There are a few indicators I will be monitoring closely as summarized below.

(1) Prices increased yesterday on the largest volume since November 21. The up/down volume spread – determined by subtracting the volume of declining issues on the NYSE from advancing issues – needs to show sustained expansion as prices rise.

12-mrt-2.jpg

Source: StockCharts.com

(2) Similarly, the advance/decline spread, measuring the breadth of a stock market advance, needs to see advancing issues outpacing declining issues on a steady basis, i.e. a rising trend as far as the cumulative figure is concerned.

12-mrt-3.jpg

Source: StockCharts.com

(3) New highs need to consistently outpace new lows as reflected by the net new highs, calculated by subtracting the number of new 52-week lows from the number of new 52-week highs.

12-mrt-4.jpg

(4) Turning to Lowry’s Research, Richard Russell (Dow Theory Letters) said: “Normally, at final bear market bottoms, the Buying Power Index will plow higher as institutional money rushes in to pick up ‘bargains’.” Lowry’s statistics are not yet giving any hint.

(5) The number of NYSE stocks trading above their respective 50-day moving averages is a lowly 12.0%. In order to be bullish about the secondary trend, one would expect the majority of stocks to be above the 50-day line. For a primary uptrend to manifest itself, the bulk of the index constituents also need to trade above their 200-day averages. This is a slow indicator, but the number at the moment is still only 4.5%.

12-mrt-5.jpg

Source: StockCharts.com

(6) The Bullish Percent Index shows the percentage of stocks currently in bullish mode as a result of point-and-figure buy signals. With the figure at 13.0% for the NYSE, this indicator conveys the same message as the previous one.

In short, the stock market still needs to do a considerable amount of work before evidence of a primary bear market low will be demonstrated. As a first step, the indices must clear their respective 50-day moving averages and the November 20 lows. (As mentioned before, the large deviations of the moving averages pointed to a massively oversold situation – almost like a spring that is stretched too far – and a measure of mean reversion was to be expected.)

12-mrt-6.jpg

It is possible that a rally may ensue and last until the release of potentially ugly earnings and guidance announcements in April. However, always remember the old adage: “bulls make money, bears make money, but trading against the primary trend makes for sleepless nights.”

Did you enjoy this post? If so, click here to subscribe to updates to Investment Postcards from Cape Town by e-mail.

2 Responses to “Stock markets: Relief rally or new bull?”

  1. rktbrkr Says:

    300 Point Dow Gains? During Bear Markets ONLY
    Wednesday, August 06, 2008 | 03:29 PM
    in Markets | Technical Analysis | Trading

    Merrill Lynch’s David Rosenberg was on CNBC this morning, discussing the current Bear Market. He noted that this was the sixth 300 point rally to occur since September 2007 (markets peaked the next month) — a period of time which can only be described as a Bear Market.

    Even more intriguing, he observed that EVERY 300 point DJIA rally has occurred ONLY during bear markets. (Even the 1998 LTCM crisis saw two single-day gains of more than 300 points, September 8 and October 15, 1998. At its intra-day lows, 1998 had a 20% decline).

    During the 2000 to 2002 bear market, the DJIA had 15 days where it gained more than 300 points. The first was March 15, 2000 (five days after the NASDAQ peaked) and the last was October 15, 2002, near the bottom of the bear market.

    Hence, the odds are against making money chasing these 300+ point rallies.

    During the 2002 to 2007 bull market, the DJIA had no days where it gained more than 300 points.

    Jim Bianco asks: “What does the stock market do during bear markets? It has days where it gains more than 300 points in a day. What doesn’t the stock market do in a bull market? It does not have days where it gains more than 300 points in a day.”

    What does yesterday’s rally say about the state of the stock market . . .?

  2. ben22 Says:

    the 300 point stat is fine but it seems this article focuses on the % gain not the point total gain so what exactly is Rosenberg’s point?

    I seem to recall this stat being brought up months ago and people actually pulling it apart and showing it wasn’t even true. I’m sure you could do the same with the historical price charts on yahoo.