The Great Repression Continues
Good Evening: Tuesday turned out to be a relatively tranquil day for our capital markets, especially in light of yesterday’s drubbing in so many asset classes. Stocks, bonds, currencies, and commodities all finished within walking distance of unchanged by day’s end, and while a respite from the recent declines is certainly welcome, it’s not exactly bullish that stocks, credit, and commodities lack energy after fairly sizable declines. What will it take to break this hapless cycle of self-reinforcing negativity? Perhaps a view from Down Under will be of help.
While they didn’t exactly shrug in reaction to yesterday’s downdraft in Wall Street, global equity markets overnight weren’t down as much as U.S. markets had been on Monday. Our stock index futures were on the sunny side of yesterday’s closing levels heading into Tuesday, with finger pointing about AIG one of the morning’s big themes. Both former AIG Chairman, Hank Greenberg, and current Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, took turns disparaging the insurance giant. The usual claims of greed and regulatory failure were bandied about, but I’m convinced that AIG would be in a lot less trouble had Credit Default Swaps now hanging like a noose around their neck been required to be listed on exchanges subject to the same oversight and daily margin requirements that are a common feature of our futures and options markets. Former CFTC Commissioner, Brooksley Born, proposed this very concept in 1998 (prior to the collapse of Long Term Capital Management), but her idea was shot down by Alan Greenspan, with assistance from Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers. She was right; thanks again, Maestro.
Stocks opened 1% or more to the upside, but this early pop could not be sustained in the face of today’s economic statistics. Pending home sales figures were down 7.7%, or twice a much as the drop expected by the consensus. Pending sales lead actual sales, so there is still no housing bottom in sight (for BAC-MER’s take, see below). Auto sales were just as putrid, falling to an annual rate of 6.4 million units (see below). By way of comparison, auto sales were running at 11.6 million at this time last year, and they peaked at even higher levels earlier in the cycle. Since housing and autos still tend to have the largest multiplier effects in our economy, stocks backed off as this news trickled in during the day.
After the morning rally faded, the S&P fell below 700 for the first time in 13 years and is almost back to the level when Alan Greenspan gave his famous “irrational exuberance” speech in late ‘96. Equities bounced back above 700 during the afternoon, but a late sell off left the averages down between 0.15% (NASDAQ) and 1.85% (Russell 2000). Treasurys couldn’t be bothered during much of today’s trading and yields rose a modest 1 to 3 bps. The dollar was likewise less than volatile in posting a 0.15% gain, while the commodity complex managed a slightly better bounce after yesterday’s pounding. Oil was up more than 3%, and though precious metals were once again under pressure, the CRB index finished 1.6% to the good.
The link you see below comes courtesy of the online version of the Australian, though its author, Niall Ferguson, teaches at Harvard and is associated with the Hoover Institute. Mr. Ferguson was one of the favored few thousand who rubbed elbows with the powers that be at the recent economic forum in Davos, Switzerland. His observations from that glitzy summit are as interesting as they are eloquent. He reduces our current economic travails to a very simple observation (and I’m paraphrasing him here): “The developed world has taken on too much debt — can the Keynesian prescription of taking on even more debt be the solution?” He cleverly calls our current mess and the piecemeal fixes offered to date “the great repression”.
Not content to just complain, he also offers an equally simple strategy to set us on the right path. Mr. Ferguson thinks the U.S. needs to take the lead by taking its banks in hand, restructuring the worst of them and their obligations until the U.S. and global financial system can once again function. He also feels a dose of inflation will turn out to be one of the more politically expedient ways of defeasing all the accumulated obligations. And though I must admit his solutions come up a bit short on the devilish details necessary to implement his ideas, I do his well written arguments little justice here. I advise everyone to read the article for themselves, and I will close with the final paragraph of “The great repression”:
“Americans, Churchill once remarked, will always do the right thing – after they have exhausted all the other alternatives. But if we are still waiting for Keynes to save us when Davos comes around next year, it may well be too late. Only a Great Restructuring can end the Great Repression. It needs to happen soon.”
– Jack McHugh
U.S. Stocks Retreat Following Bernanke’s Warning on Banks






March 4th, 2009 at 5:12 pm
Niall Ferguson’s PBS special was superbly lucid. TV is great at doing ex post facto reviews, not very good at letting people know about black swans (or even bloody obvious brown ducks). But I digress..
Interesting turn-around in GE and in JNK intra-day today. Any ideas on what might have caused these reversals? I assume that concerns about GE credit rating have been dragging a number of bonds down this week.
March 5th, 2009 at 1:44 am
Keynesian Prescription has nothing to do with the problem. Actually a real stimulus would be nice, and maybe helpful. If the money dumped into I. Banks had been given in cash to each and all – homeless, unemployed, employed, illegal, tourists, Gates and the Oracle – we’d know what a stimulus was and could do.
1. Restructure every damn Investment Bank. We know they plumb the depths of insolvency on the books; imagine the unregulated morass.
2. Principle reduction or extended mortgage chaos. Should have been done a couple of years ago. Here we have commercial banks. Commercial banks actually do banking. Compensate the Commercial Banks for the reduction to protect their reserves, or let them go to hell and give their deposits to Chase.
March 9th, 2009 at 4:34 pm
The key point of Keynesian economics is to smooth out peaks and valleys. Had we continued with Clinton-Gore balanced budget policies, we’d be in excellent position to borrow now. The failure of Keynesian economics is when politicians accept the ‘borrow when times are bad’ philosophy but then also ‘borrow when times are good’ and refuse to run a surplus in the better years.
The moaning and complaining about Clinton’s temporary surplus (“it’s your money, not the government’s”) was an amazing display of short-sightedness among conservatives. When did they expect to pay back the deficits run by Reagan-Bush? If we accept the need for deficit-funded tax cuts or deficit-funded stimulus and wars, we must accept the need for periodic budget surpluses to balance this out.