<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back to the Future Recession</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/back-to-the-future-recession/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/back-to-the-future-recession/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:43:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jc</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/back-to-the-future-recession/comment-page-1/#comment-165356</link>
		<dc:creator>jc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24473#comment-165356</guid>
		<description>I read this and come away thinking we need the economic equivalent of the Doug Flutie Hail Mary to Gerard Phelan.

We need an economic QB that is bold , decisive but most of all honest and QB Geithner lacks all of these qualities. Is there anyone who will believe the results of this stress test and can&#039;t see the huge hosing this Public Private partnership is going to apply to the US taxpayer? He keeps telling us how complicated it is but we ain&#039;t all dumb.

I started posting &quot;buy a home, get a greencard&quot; this winter before the Shilling/Lefrak article, sadly it never gained any momentum. The imbalance between sellers of foreclosed properties and the buyers will push prices into another vortex with trillions being thrown at the banks we&#039;ve formally declared immortal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this and come away thinking we need the economic equivalent of the Doug Flutie Hail Mary to Gerard Phelan.</p>
<p>We need an economic QB that is bold , decisive but most of all honest and QB Geithner lacks all of these qualities. Is there anyone who will believe the results of this stress test and can&#8217;t see the huge hosing this Public Private partnership is going to apply to the US taxpayer? He keeps telling us how complicated it is but we ain&#8217;t all dumb.</p>
<p>I started posting &#8220;buy a home, get a greencard&#8221; this winter before the Shilling/Lefrak article, sadly it never gained any momentum. The imbalance between sellers of foreclosed properties and the buyers will push prices into another vortex with trillions being thrown at the banks we&#8217;ve formally declared immortal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/back-to-the-future-recession/comment-page-1/#comment-165148</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24473#comment-165148</guid>
		<description>From the foregoing:

 “No, you can’t [let these guys go bankrupt ] … unless you want 25% unemployment again”.     

This sounds a lot like what the typical bailout advocate argues.    They argue, essentially, that we have ONLY two choices: (a) do it exactly the way that Paulson and Geithner want to do it, or (b) face annihilation of  the financial system.             For bailout advocates there is never a third choice.    
How about this for a third choice?      Break up Citi  and BAC (and wipe out the bondholders), and put AIG into bankruptcy.     Temporarily nationalize any of these three companies to facilitate the process.       This would have done a world of good if done last September.  

   I have yet to hear a bailout advocate admit that there’s a third option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the foregoing:</p>
<p> “No, you can’t [let these guys go bankrupt ] … unless you want 25% unemployment again”.     </p>
<p>This sounds a lot like what the typical bailout advocate argues.    They argue, essentially, that we have ONLY two choices: (a) do it exactly the way that Paulson and Geithner want to do it, or (b) face annihilation of  the financial system.             For bailout advocates there is never a third choice.<br />
How about this for a third choice?      Break up Citi  and BAC (and wipe out the bondholders), and put AIG into bankruptcy.     Temporarily nationalize any of these three companies to facilitate the process.       This would have done a world of good if done last September.  </p>
<p>   I have yet to hear a bailout advocate admit that there’s a third option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: microcap</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/back-to-the-future-recession/comment-page-1/#comment-165116</link>
		<dc:creator>microcap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24473#comment-165116</guid>
		<description>As I have said before, I hate virtually everyone in this charade we call the investment  management business.

But I love John Mauldin.  Absolutely the best common sense writing out there.  Thanks to him for allowing BR to post his stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I have said before, I hate virtually everyone in this charade we call the investment  management business.</p>
<p>But I love John Mauldin.  Absolutely the best common sense writing out there.  Thanks to him for allowing BR to post his stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back to the Future Recession</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/back-to-the-future-recession/comment-page-1/#comment-165081</link>
		<dc:creator>Back to the Future Recession</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24473#comment-165081</guid>
		<description>[...] News Sources wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptBack to the Future Recession April 24, 2009 By John Mauldin Financial Innovation: The Round Trip Back to the Future Recession The Fed at the Crossroads How Did We Get It So Wrong? The Trend Is Not Your Friend When It Ends Orlando, Naples, Cleveland, and Grandkids This week we look at the second half of my speech from a few weeks ago at my annual Strategic Investment Conference in La Jolla. If you have not read the first part, you can review it here . The f [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] News Sources wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptBack to the Future Recession April 24, 2009 By John Mauldin Financial Innovation: The Round Trip Back to the Future Recession The Fed at the Crossroads How Did We Get It So Wrong? The Trend Is Not Your Friend When It Ends Orlando, Naples, Cleveland, and Grandkids This week we look at the second half of my speech from a few weeks ago at my annual Strategic Investment Conference in La Jolla. If you have not read the first part, you can review it here . The f [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back to the Future Recession</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/back-to-the-future-recession/comment-page-1/#comment-165080</link>
		<dc:creator>Back to the Future Recession</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24473#comment-165080</guid>
		<description>[...] the rest of this great post here    Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rest of this great post here    Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
