<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beware Insider Selling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/beware-insider-selling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/beware-insider-selling/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:55:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insider Selling Soars in April 2009&#8230;Analyst Ponder the Significance</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/beware-insider-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-167949</link>
		<dc:creator>Insider Selling Soars in April 2009&#8230;Analyst Ponder the Significance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24510#comment-167949</guid>
		<description>[...] Beware Insider Selling    By Barry Ritholtz - April 26th, 2009, 8:15AM   “Nobody ever sold a stock because they thought it would go up. And as a group, corporate insiders obviously are scarcely enthusiastic about the prospects for a genuine bull market.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Beware Insider Selling    By Barry Ritholtz &#8211; April 26th, 2009, 8:15AM   “Nobody ever sold a stock because they thought it would go up. And as a group, corporate insiders obviously are scarcely enthusiastic about the prospects for a genuine bull market.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TSBTV#56 - Insider Activity &#124; TheStockBandit.TV</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/beware-insider-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-165753</link>
		<dc:creator>TSBTV#56 - Insider Activity &#124; TheStockBandit.TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24510#comment-165753</guid>
		<description>[...] activity (the buying &amp; selling of shares by corporate executives).  So when I ran across this post today, I felt the need to clarify my personal stance on this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] activity (the buying &amp; selling of shares by corporate executives).  So when I ran across this post today, I felt the need to clarify my personal stance on this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASOS makes me look like an ass&#8230; : Interactive Investor Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/beware-insider-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-165507</link>
		<dc:creator>ASOS makes me look like an ass&#8230; : Interactive Investor Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24510#comment-165507</guid>
		<description>[...] The Big Picture notes that director buys and sells are useful market timing indicators according to Bob Bronson, an analyst, and now they&#8217;re selling in droves. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Big Picture notes that director buys and sells are useful market timing indicators according to Bob Bronson, an analyst, and now they&#8217;re selling in droves. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sucker&#8217;s Rally: watch what they do, not what they say . . . &#171; Dregs of the Future</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/beware-insider-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-165478</link>
		<dc:creator>Sucker&#8217;s Rally: watch what they do, not what they say . . . &#171; Dregs of the Future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24510#comment-165478</guid>
		<description>[...] (Source.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Source.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatB</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/beware-insider-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-165389</link>
		<dc:creator>MatB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24510#comment-165389</guid>
		<description>They also might be selling into an upturn because their personal income has been impacted by the economic doldrums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They also might be selling into an upturn because their personal income has been impacted by the economic doldrums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zot23</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/beware-insider-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-165373</link>
		<dc:creator>zot23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24510#comment-165373</guid>
		<description>The bottom is in?  What, before the civil war?  Aw man, I always miss the best parts.  Who won this time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bottom is in?  What, before the civil war?  Aw man, I always miss the best parts.  Who won this time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker from Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/beware-insider-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-165357</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker from Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24510#comment-165357</guid>
		<description>kukiniloa Says:
April 26th, 2009 at 6:05 pm

Headlines belie this fact. Take marketwatch.com for instance. Today we have the headlines:
“Stocks Ride Earnings Wave of Mostly Upbeat Results” ;
“How a 5% Drop in GDP Can Look Good”; and
“With Bar Set Low, Corporate America Exceeds Expectations.”

Obviously these headlines are examples of “polishing the turd.”

But really, if the bar has been set low and assuming that shares have been properly discounted, how can we argue that there will be a sell-off.&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;

Indeed, hard to believe isn&#039;t it?  Could be the good old contrary indicator of the MSM headline.  Eventually reality will set in though and the market will no longer be able to ignore it.  That&#039;s a recurring theme in bear markets.  The psychology cycles back and forth, and by the time it&#039;s truly over they won&#039;t believe it.  

The swine flu scare could be just the kind of trigger to snap back to reality.  Who knows.  Time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kukiniloa Says:<br />
April 26th, 2009 at 6:05 pm</p>
<p>Headlines belie this fact. Take marketwatch.com for instance. Today we have the headlines:<br />
“Stocks Ride Earnings Wave of Mostly Upbeat Results” ;<br />
“How a 5% Drop in GDP Can Look Good”; and<br />
“With Bar Set Low, Corporate America Exceeds Expectations.”</p>
<p>Obviously these headlines are examples of “polishing the turd.”</p>
<p>But really, if the bar has been set low and assuming that shares have been properly discounted, how can we argue that there will be a sell-off.&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;</p>
<p>Indeed, hard to believe isn&#8217;t it?  Could be the good old contrary indicator of the MSM headline.  Eventually reality will set in though and the market will no longer be able to ignore it.  That&#8217;s a recurring theme in bear markets.  The psychology cycles back and forth, and by the time it&#8217;s truly over they won&#8217;t believe it.  </p>
<p>The swine flu scare could be just the kind of trigger to snap back to reality.  Who knows.  Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moss</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/beware-insider-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-165352</link>
		<dc:creator>Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24510#comment-165352</guid>
		<description>I suspect that some of the levered insiders had additional margin calls with the March lows.
As far as prospects for the consumer sensitive areas go one only needs to look at UPS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that some of the levered insiders had additional margin calls with the March lows.<br />
As far as prospects for the consumer sensitive areas go one only needs to look at UPS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kukiniloa</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/beware-insider-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-165351</link>
		<dc:creator>kukiniloa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24510#comment-165351</guid>
		<description>Headlines belie this fact.  Take marketwatch.com for instance.  Today we have the headlines:
&quot;Stocks Ride Earnings Wave of Mostly Upbeat Results&quot; ;
&quot;How a 5% Drop in GDP Can Look Good&quot;; and
&quot;With Bar Set Low, Corporate America Exceeds Expectations.&quot;

Obviously these headlines are examples of &quot;polishing the turd.&quot;  

But really, if the bar has been set low and assuming that shares have been properly discounted, how can we argue that there will be a sell-off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Headlines belie this fact.  Take marketwatch.com for instance.  Today we have the headlines:<br />
&#8220;Stocks Ride Earnings Wave of Mostly Upbeat Results&#8221; ;<br />
&#8220;How a 5% Drop in GDP Can Look Good&#8221;; and<br />
&#8220;With Bar Set Low, Corporate America Exceeds Expectations.&#8221;</p>
<p>Obviously these headlines are examples of &#8220;polishing the turd.&#8221;  </p>
<p>But really, if the bar has been set low and assuming that shares have been properly discounted, how can we argue that there will be a sell-off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/beware-insider-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-165347</link>
		<dc:creator>jc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24510#comment-165347</guid>
		<description>Not even the most optimistic claim that the bottom has been reached. No recovery is imaginable while we lose jobs at this rate. Increased foreclosure sales and super size losses for the banks will be a another body slam for the economy in the next few months</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not even the most optimistic claim that the bottom has been reached. No recovery is imaginable while we lose jobs at this rate. Increased foreclosure sales and super size losses for the banks will be a another body slam for the economy in the next few months</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

