<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Earnings Decline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/earnings-decline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/earnings-decline/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:35:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CyHastings</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/earnings-decline/comment-page-1/#comment-161667</link>
		<dc:creator>CyHastings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23533#comment-161667</guid>
		<description>I bet you haven&#039;t got invited to Buffy&#039;s Dalton grad soiree as of yet have you LB??

All that gloom and doom....pshaww....

Hey!! Have you seen Chip&#039;s new racehorse!! It&#039;s got the most gorgeous eyes!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet you haven&#8217;t got invited to Buffy&#8217;s Dalton grad soiree as of yet have you LB??</p>
<p>All that gloom and doom&#8230;.pshaww&#8230;.</p>
<p>Hey!! Have you seen Chip&#8217;s new racehorse!! It&#8217;s got the most gorgeous eyes!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Step Beyond</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/earnings-decline/comment-page-1/#comment-161320</link>
		<dc:creator>One Step Beyond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23533#comment-161320</guid>
		<description>&quot;order of magnitude&quot; 

You keep using that phrase.
I do not think it means what you think it means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;order of magnitude&#8221; </p>
<p>You keep using that phrase.<br />
I do not think it means what you think it means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftback</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/earnings-decline/comment-page-1/#comment-161317</link>
		<dc:creator>leftback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23533#comment-161317</guid>
		<description>Companies have earnings? I thought that stocks only had prices, and they are cheap cheap cheap...

Oh yeah, that&#039;s right. P/E ratios generally decline to single digits during deep recessions.
My guess is that the institutional investors focus on earnings this week.

This may not come to pass necessarily, but this week I couldn&#039;t help but remember that we had a happy-clappy rally just like this during the week leading up to Thanksgiving. All week long with a lot of traders out or sitting on the sidelines we had buying on light volume. On the Monday they came in and sold.

I was thinking this week that the mood in New York right now is actually amazingly complacent. People are thinking that sure 2008 was awful, they lost 50% of their money and they couldn&#039;t sell their apartment if they tried, but they still have a job and the market always comes back, look it&#039;s up 25% off the lows, and hey, Manhattan real estate never goes down. 

So unemployment, foreclosure, what&#039;s that? It is happening to some schmoes in California, Michigan and Ohio, so that doesn&#039;t matter, right? We dodged the bullet, the big bonuses will come back and we can still have the place in the Hamptons and send the kids to Dalton as well as have the extra marble counter top installed in the maid&#039;s kitchen. The credit card bills are a concern, but hey, next year&#039;s bonus will take care of it, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Companies have earnings? I thought that stocks only had prices, and they are cheap cheap cheap&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh yeah, that&#8217;s right. P/E ratios generally decline to single digits during deep recessions.<br />
My guess is that the institutional investors focus on earnings this week.</p>
<p>This may not come to pass necessarily, but this week I couldn&#8217;t help but remember that we had a happy-clappy rally just like this during the week leading up to Thanksgiving. All week long with a lot of traders out or sitting on the sidelines we had buying on light volume. On the Monday they came in and sold.</p>
<p>I was thinking this week that the mood in New York right now is actually amazingly complacent. People are thinking that sure 2008 was awful, they lost 50% of their money and they couldn&#8217;t sell their apartment if they tried, but they still have a job and the market always comes back, look it&#8217;s up 25% off the lows, and hey, Manhattan real estate never goes down. </p>
<p>So unemployment, foreclosure, what&#8217;s that? It is happening to some schmoes in California, Michigan and Ohio, so that doesn&#8217;t matter, right? We dodged the bullet, the big bonuses will come back and we can still have the place in the Hamptons and send the kids to Dalton as well as have the extra marble counter top installed in the maid&#8217;s kitchen. The credit card bills are a concern, but hey, next year&#8217;s bonus will take care of it, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Nola</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/earnings-decline/comment-page-1/#comment-161298</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Nola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23533#comment-161298</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Cramer would tell you that it&#039;s already priced in and it&#039;s time to party like it&#039;s 1999.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Cramer would tell you that it&#8217;s already priced in and it&#8217;s time to party like it&#8217;s 1999.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
