<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fancy Charts &amp; Graphs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/fancy-charts-graphs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/fancy-charts-graphs/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:23:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FromLori</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/fancy-charts-graphs/comment-page-2/#comment-160891</link>
		<dc:creator>FromLori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 03:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23394#comment-160891</guid>
		<description>Maybe this will spice it up.

LIVE VOTE
If you were grading Barack Obama on his performance as president, what would he get?   * 1891554 responses	
He gets an A
30% 
He gets a B
6.3% 
He gets a C
5.4% 
He gets a D
14% 
He gets an F
44% 
Not a scientific survey. Click to learn more. Results may not total 100% due to rounding.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29493093/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this will spice it up.</p>
<p>LIVE VOTE<br />
If you were grading Barack Obama on his performance as president, what would he get?   * 1891554 responses<br />
He gets an A<br />
30%<br />
He gets a B<br />
6.3%<br />
He gets a C<br />
5.4%<br />
He gets a D<br />
14%<br />
He gets an F<br />
44%<br />
Not a scientific survey. Click to learn more. Results may not total 100% due to rounding.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29493093/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29493093/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/fancy-charts-graphs/comment-page-2/#comment-160872</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23394#comment-160872</guid>
		<description>moneyneversleepsblog    @ 6:27

Agree.     One of the reasons why it’s hard to respect the guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>moneyneversleepsblog    @ 6:27</p>
<p>Agree.     One of the reasons why it’s hard to respect the guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moneyneversleepsblog</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/fancy-charts-graphs/comment-page-2/#comment-160859</link>
		<dc:creator>moneyneversleepsblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23394#comment-160859</guid>
		<description>Speaking of leverage, why must Cramer attack proshares everyday: http://moneyneversleepsblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/cramer-continues-outrage-over-proshares.html

Personally I&#039;m a big fan of Proshares ETF&#039;s, they have always done exactly what I needed.. heaven forbid you can make money easily in a rough market... hopefully no one important is listening to him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of leverage, why must Cramer attack proshares everyday: <a href="http://moneyneversleepsblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/cramer-continues-outrage-over-proshares.html" rel="nofollow">http://moneyneversleepsblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/cramer-continues-outrage-over-proshares.html</a></p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;m a big fan of Proshares ETF&#8217;s, they have always done exactly what I needed.. heaven forbid you can make money easily in a rough market&#8230; hopefully no one important is listening to him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker from Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/fancy-charts-graphs/comment-page-2/#comment-160847</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker from Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23394#comment-160847</guid>
		<description>&quot;how is it different than just shorting 100 stocks instead of one call option contract??&quot;

One word - leverage.  Unless you&#039;re shorting on similar leverage, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;how is it different than just shorting 100 stocks instead of one call option contract??&#8221;</p>
<p>One word &#8211; leverage.  Unless you&#8217;re shorting on similar leverage, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/fancy-charts-graphs/comment-page-2/#comment-160839</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23394#comment-160839</guid>
		<description>techy  @ 4:44

 The point is just that  if the market stays flat or declines, you’ll make money (being short call options).      If you’re short stocks, a declining market is a necessity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>techy  @ 4:44</p>
<p> The point is just that  if the market stays flat or declines, you’ll make money (being short call options).      If you’re short stocks, a declining market is a necessity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MRegan</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/fancy-charts-graphs/comment-page-2/#comment-160835</link>
		<dc:creator>MRegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23394#comment-160835</guid>
		<description>MH-

Eyeballin&#039; it what do you think? I would not be surprised to see it @39+ in short order. catman was right to question it but the $34 price was rich as I noted- $31+ was reasonable (and easy to get).

F cancelled debt closed at what 3.95 - that is 30% plus in short order-positive story cycle is probably coming to an end- 4.15+ is quite reachable.

GFA- from 9.80 to a 13.55 close- maybe someone could work out the numbers on that one. Nevermind. Maybe booking moderate gains is good policy in a market like this one. 

CF- funny action today- lower volume, hmm... yeah, well. things are only clear to me for brief periods, when I can see it, I stop looking for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MH-</p>
<p>Eyeballin&#8217; it what do you think? I would not be surprised to see it @39+ in short order. catman was right to question it but the $34 price was rich as I noted- $31+ was reasonable (and easy to get).</p>
<p>F cancelled debt closed at what 3.95 &#8211; that is 30% plus in short order-positive story cycle is probably coming to an end- 4.15+ is quite reachable.</p>
<p>GFA- from 9.80 to a 13.55 close- maybe someone could work out the numbers on that one. Nevermind. Maybe booking moderate gains is good policy in a market like this one. </p>
<p>CF- funny action today- lower volume, hmm&#8230; yeah, well. things are only clear to me for brief periods, when I can see it, I stop looking for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce in Tn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/fancy-charts-graphs/comment-page-2/#comment-160834</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce in Tn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23394#comment-160834</guid>
		<description>One other thing I noticed today in my readings...we talked several weeks ago about who would want to live in Kansas, or Nebraska, or Iowa....remember...some thought it would be purgatory to live in Kansas...

http://mainstreet.com/article/moneyinvesting/news/happiness-index-nebraska-nabs-top-spot

Happiness Index: Nebraska Nabs Top Spot

Guess who came in number 2?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing I noticed today in my readings&#8230;we talked several weeks ago about who would want to live in Kansas, or Nebraska, or Iowa&#8230;.remember&#8230;some thought it would be purgatory to live in Kansas&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://mainstreet.com/article/moneyinvesting/news/happiness-index-nebraska-nabs-top-spot" rel="nofollow">http://mainstreet.com/article/moneyinvesting/news/happiness-index-nebraska-nabs-top-spot</a></p>
<p>Happiness Index: Nebraska Nabs Top Spot</p>
<p>Guess who came in number 2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/fancy-charts-graphs/comment-page-2/#comment-160833</link>
		<dc:creator>techy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23394#comment-160833</guid>
		<description>DL Says: 

April 8th, 2009 at 4:25 pm 
LB - - 

Try shorting some call options. That should keep you awake (at night, also).



how is it different than just shorting 100 stocks instead of one call option contract??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DL Says: </p>
<p>April 8th, 2009 at 4:25 pm<br />
LB &#8211; - </p>
<p>Try shorting some call options. That should keep you awake (at night, also).</p>
<p>how is it different than just shorting 100 stocks instead of one call option contract??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/fancy-charts-graphs/comment-page-2/#comment-160832</link>
		<dc:creator>techy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23394#comment-160832</guid>
		<description>Mannwich:

why do we need PPT when we have OPM??

we are all punters now....trading by the charts...and right now people are buying because it is an uptrend....with lots of Bullish(it) signs..

i personally beleive PPT sending equities up is not very difficult and not needed, itse better to give trillions direct to the banks, auto industry,housing etc.. so that their market cap will remain up.

I have seen AAPL go from 200 to 120 back to 180 then down to 78 and now at 115. (all the while their earnings kept going up...just the expecations fluctuated)

50% variance is no big deal in this casi-no.

but it must be frustrating that the trade which the whole world is waiting for is not working :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mannwich:</p>
<p>why do we need PPT when we have OPM??</p>
<p>we are all punters now&#8230;.trading by the charts&#8230;and right now people are buying because it is an uptrend&#8230;.with lots of Bullish(it) signs..</p>
<p>i personally beleive PPT sending equities up is not very difficult and not needed, itse better to give trillions direct to the banks, auto industry,housing etc.. so that their market cap will remain up.</p>
<p>I have seen AAPL go from 200 to 120 back to 180 then down to 78 and now at 115. (all the while their earnings kept going up&#8230;just the expecations fluctuated)</p>
<p>50% variance is no big deal in this casi-no.</p>
<p>but it must be frustrating that the trade which the whole world is waiting for is not working <img src='http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/fancy-charts-graphs/comment-page-2/#comment-160829</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23394#comment-160829</guid>
		<description>MR--

re NVEC, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if it was in reation to the &#039;e-Grid hacked&#039;-story

also, DoD/DHS might be getting ready to lay some &#039;tracts on them..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MR&#8211;</p>
<p>re NVEC, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it was in reation to the &#8216;e-Grid hacked&#8217;-story</p>
<p>also, DoD/DHS might be getting ready to lay some &#8216;tracts on them..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
