<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Bloggers Gain Recognition Amid Turmoil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/financial-bloggers-gain-recognition-amid-turmoil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/financial-bloggers-gain-recognition-amid-turmoil/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:30:25 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hot News &#187; Vince Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/financial-bloggers-gain-recognition-amid-turmoil/comment-page-2/#comment-164644</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot News &#187; Vince Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23623#comment-164644</guid>
		<description>[...] Vince Foster [Dan Collins]...facet-award.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Christopher Ruddy...Financial Bloggers Gain Recognition Amid Turmoil &#124; The Big Picture...Now What Do You Think About the Death of Vince Foster? &#171; sexy white man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vince Foster [Dan Collins]&#8230;facet-award.org &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; Christopher Ruddy&#8230;Financial Bloggers Gain Recognition Amid Turmoil | The Big Picture&#8230;Now What Do You Think About the Death of Vince Foster? &laquo; sexy white man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usphoenix</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/financial-bloggers-gain-recognition-amid-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-162025</link>
		<dc:creator>usphoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23623#comment-162025</guid>
		<description>@karen: Thanks for the music.  But it&#039;s not Friday.  Ling&#039;s better.

Made me wishing for more Dido.  Or PJ Harvey, who I just read has a great new album out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@karen: Thanks for the music.  But it&#8217;s not Friday.  Ling&#8217;s better.</p>
<p>Made me wishing for more Dido.  Or PJ Harvey, who I just read has a great new album out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: batmando</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/financial-bloggers-gain-recognition-amid-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-161827</link>
		<dc:creator>batmando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23623#comment-161827</guid>
		<description>Now if only  &quot;Obama (was) going to allow raids on the pirate camps in Manhattan…maybe there (might be) a ray of hope…&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now if only  &#8220;Obama (was) going to allow raids on the pirate camps in Manhattan…maybe there (might be) a ray of hope…&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OSR</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/financial-bloggers-gain-recognition-amid-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-161755</link>
		<dc:creator>OSR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23623#comment-161755</guid>
		<description>Officials and the PR companies definitely monitor blogs. I&#039;m not an econoblogger and I find the number of xxx.gov hits that I get amusing. 

As far as which economists (blogging or otherwise) are credible, ask yourself, &quot;How many of them predicted this Depression?&quot; I think it&#039;s somewhere like 0.00001%. That&#039;s all ye need to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Officials and the PR companies definitely monitor blogs. I&#8217;m not an econoblogger and I find the number of xxx.gov hits that I get amusing. </p>
<p>As far as which economists (blogging or otherwise) are credible, ask yourself, &#8220;How many of them predicted this Depression?&#8221; I think it&#8217;s somewhere like 0.00001%. That&#8217;s all ye need to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tripower</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/financial-bloggers-gain-recognition-amid-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-161752</link>
		<dc:creator>Tripower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23623#comment-161752</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the different viewpoints I get with financial bloggers compared to the MSM.  It sure beats the braying of Kudlow on CNBC and his mustard seeds. 

I think the &quot;throwing popcorn at the screen&quot; comment has much merit, but from a different perspective. When the TARP was initially put before Congress, calls to our Reps were up to 300:1 against from their constituents. Despite that, Congress passed the TARP, and less than 2 months later most of the incumbents were voted back into office. This just tells me the American people don&#039;t care enough about what the Government does. And if anything has been made abundantly clear through this economic crisis, it&#039;s that our Government is in the back pocket of Wall Street, and will do almost anything they say needs done, even if it destroys the rest of the country. 

Without a radical change to the 2 party system, and the corporate favoritism it foments through their lobbyists and large campaign contributions, the average American will have no voice.  Our republic has been corrupted, and until the voters get off their couches and do something about, it will continue to be corrupt.  We&#039;ve seen massive fraud through fraudulent loans, and our government regulators have done little to stop it, or prosecute those involved. We have thus far seen no action from them to stop the systemic risk. Too big to fail should be too big to exist, but nothing has been done to break up the large financial institutions into smaller entities. All the Governemnt does is keep throwing money at Wall Street.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the different viewpoints I get with financial bloggers compared to the MSM.  It sure beats the braying of Kudlow on CNBC and his mustard seeds. </p>
<p>I think the &#8220;throwing popcorn at the screen&#8221; comment has much merit, but from a different perspective. When the TARP was initially put before Congress, calls to our Reps were up to 300:1 against from their constituents. Despite that, Congress passed the TARP, and less than 2 months later most of the incumbents were voted back into office. This just tells me the American people don&#8217;t care enough about what the Government does. And if anything has been made abundantly clear through this economic crisis, it&#8217;s that our Government is in the back pocket of Wall Street, and will do almost anything they say needs done, even if it destroys the rest of the country. </p>
<p>Without a radical change to the 2 party system, and the corporate favoritism it foments through their lobbyists and large campaign contributions, the average American will have no voice.  Our republic has been corrupted, and until the voters get off their couches and do something about, it will continue to be corrupt.  We&#8217;ve seen massive fraud through fraudulent loans, and our government regulators have done little to stop it, or prosecute those involved. We have thus far seen no action from them to stop the systemic risk. Too big to fail should be too big to exist, but nothing has been done to break up the large financial institutions into smaller entities. All the Governemnt does is keep throwing money at Wall Street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/financial-bloggers-gain-recognition-amid-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-161751</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23623#comment-161751</guid>
		<description>Marcus Aurelius , 

use GOOG, much?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=JFK+Jr.+Mena&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&amp;address=389x2806116

this is flippin&#039; G*rbage that you&#039;re using to base your point on?

Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 10:20 PM by RedEarth
On the January 31 broadcast of The Savage Nation, host Michael Savage asserted, &quot;Look, Obama&#039;s not getting the nomination. If he does, I wouldn&#039;t -- well, let me just stop right there. Think John F. Kennedy Jr. and the Hyannis -- and the airplane. Think the Mena airport.&quot; 

http://mediam  atters.o  rg/items/200802010010?f=h_latest 

How in the world does someone get away with this crap?
~~
that poster&#039;s Question, is fitting, in more ways than one..

you should remember that &#039;echo-chambers&#039; are bad for your vision..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcus Aurelius , </p>
<p>use GOOG, much?<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=JFK+Jr.+Mena&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=JFK+Jr.+Mena&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=</a><br />
<a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&amp;address=389x2806116" rel="nofollow">http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&amp;address=389&#215;2806116</a></p>
<p>this is flippin&#8217; G*rbage that you&#8217;re using to base your point on?</p>
<p>Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 10:20 PM by RedEarth<br />
On the January 31 broadcast of The Savage Nation, host Michael Savage asserted, &#8220;Look, Obama&#8217;s not getting the nomination. If he does, I wouldn&#8217;t &#8212; well, let me just stop right there. Think John F. Kennedy Jr. and the Hyannis &#8212; and the airplane. Think the Mena airport.&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://mediam" rel="nofollow">http://mediam</a>  atters.o  rg/items/200802010010?f=h_latest </p>
<p>How in the world does someone get away with this crap?<br />
~~<br />
that poster&#8217;s Question, is fitting, in more ways than one..</p>
<p>you should remember that &#8216;echo-chambers&#8217; are bad for your vision..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Watts</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/financial-bloggers-gain-recognition-amid-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-161749</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23623#comment-161749</guid>
		<description>On a more serious note, if you read the Boston Globe (as I do, being from Mass.), there is no question that the quality of analysis is far better on Barry&#039;s site than the Globe. The Globe is always hopelessly behind the curve. They are reporting as &quot;trend&quot; what was already talked about and raked about over the coals for days on blogs like this one 3-4 days earlier. Reporters use blogs like Barry&#039;s as a source of story ideas and tips. They&#039;d be stupid not too. And Barry and others use breaking journalism as fodder for posts. This is a healthy interchange. The question is who is going to pay the bill. If the Boston Globe folds tomorrow, its advertisers will not. They will have to find other ways to reach their audience. If they are smart, they will be selective. Who wouldn&#039;t? The 50 cent cost of a newspaper has always been just to pay for printing it on paper, which is very very expensive. Trees must be cut down. Putting photos on newsprint is not an easy task. Advertising funds newspapers. Newspapers have enormous labor and real estate overhang that an on-line presence does not (think a printing room a half acre across). With a very few exceptions, newspapers utterly fail to do the exact &quot;first amendment&quot; job they now claim they should get financialy favors and leniency for doing. Suddenly newspapers want to market themselves as &quot;the antidote to the establishment.&quot; Well, as I recall, John McCain tried that in August 2008, once he saw he was dead in the water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a more serious note, if you read the Boston Globe (as I do, being from Mass.), there is no question that the quality of analysis is far better on Barry&#8217;s site than the Globe. The Globe is always hopelessly behind the curve. They are reporting as &#8220;trend&#8221; what was already talked about and raked about over the coals for days on blogs like this one 3-4 days earlier. Reporters use blogs like Barry&#8217;s as a source of story ideas and tips. They&#8217;d be stupid not too. And Barry and others use breaking journalism as fodder for posts. This is a healthy interchange. The question is who is going to pay the bill. If the Boston Globe folds tomorrow, its advertisers will not. They will have to find other ways to reach their audience. If they are smart, they will be selective. Who wouldn&#8217;t? The 50 cent cost of a newspaper has always been just to pay for printing it on paper, which is very very expensive. Trees must be cut down. Putting photos on newsprint is not an easy task. Advertising funds newspapers. Newspapers have enormous labor and real estate overhang that an on-line presence does not (think a printing room a half acre across). With a very few exceptions, newspapers utterly fail to do the exact &#8220;first amendment&#8221; job they now claim they should get financialy favors and leniency for doing. Suddenly newspapers want to market themselves as &#8220;the antidote to the establishment.&#8221; Well, as I recall, John McCain tried that in August 2008, once he saw he was dead in the water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Economics 101</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/financial-bloggers-gain-recognition-amid-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-161748</link>
		<dc:creator>Economics 101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23623#comment-161748</guid>
		<description>I want to make one more post here before I go.  Research the FED from inception to present and its policies.  Then ask yourself a few questions like: &quot;What is the National Debt and why am I responsible for it?&quot;  Hope this helps..........

Thanks all,

Economics 101</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to make one more post here before I go.  Research the FED from inception to present and its policies.  Then ask yourself a few questions like: &#8220;What is the National Debt and why am I responsible for it?&#8221;  Hope this helps&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Thanks all,</p>
<p>Economics 101</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Watts</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/financial-bloggers-gain-recognition-amid-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-161747</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23623#comment-161747</guid>
		<description>Franklin to a car: &quot;try feeding hay to that thing and see how far it&#039;ll get you !!!&quot;

Seriously, this is like someone saying that only text printed on linotype can be &quot;trusted.&quot; And all that stuff on &quot;post script&quot; and &quot;pagemaker&quot; is the hand of the devil. 

I await our Betamax future, Franklin ... 

Just tell me which Salvation Army is selling the player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franklin to a car: &#8220;try feeding hay to that thing and see how far it&#8217;ll get you !!!&#8221;</p>
<p>Seriously, this is like someone saying that only text printed on linotype can be &#8220;trusted.&#8221; And all that stuff on &#8220;post script&#8221; and &#8220;pagemaker&#8221; is the hand of the devil. </p>
<p>I await our Betamax future, Franklin &#8230; </p>
<p>Just tell me which Salvation Army is selling the player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Economics 101</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/financial-bloggers-gain-recognition-amid-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-161746</link>
		<dc:creator>Economics 101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23623#comment-161746</guid>
		<description>Hello all,

I&#039;m going to repost this as I view it as important.  Furthermore, I noticed that a blogger in here was wondering how a market could be going up and ignoring a &quot;depression&quot;. You might find your answer here.........(look at the date of the post).

Economics 101 Says: 

March 16th, 2009 at 9:11 pm 
Hello all,

It has been some time since my last post. Well, let us get on with it. First off…..GP it is not very nice to call people names. I enjoy that you are a bull. It is good to have many different views of the world (System). Right now, I am also bullish. I mean why not? Mark-to-Model sounds great to me (Or we can just call it “I will price my assets as I like and you give me money”…. I’ll gladly take the money. This methodology does have the ability to bring the market back along with some other shams. However, the real question is for how long? In fact, the system is and has always been a game….. no matter what type of system is being used. What matters is ones ability to understand the game and exploit opportunities faster and better than the next player. Up or down does not matter…… as long as we understand which way it will go and why. I suggest reading up on Developement Economics, WTO, IMF, Washington Consensus, International Economics, Middle Eastern History, Monetary Policy History of the U.S. (The Fed etc..), Accounting (FASB, SEC, Emerging Issues Task Force, etc..), Finance (Net Capital Rule, Leverage, etc..), and most importantly, Political Economy (Adam Smith, and the rest (Too many to list). I am no tight ass my friend…..I just know my stuff.

Thanks all,

Economics 101
(Still a student at a public school (University). Business Finance (Major), International Economics (Minor), Political Economy (Minor), Middle Eastern Studies (Upper Cluster),…..but of course I have read many of the works from fancy schools like Harvard, Yale, Cambridge, Chicago, etc..)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello all,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to repost this as I view it as important.  Furthermore, I noticed that a blogger in here was wondering how a market could be going up and ignoring a &#8220;depression&#8221;. You might find your answer here&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;(look at the date of the post).</p>
<p>Economics 101 Says: </p>
<p>March 16th, 2009 at 9:11 pm<br />
Hello all,</p>
<p>It has been some time since my last post. Well, let us get on with it. First off…..GP it is not very nice to call people names. I enjoy that you are a bull. It is good to have many different views of the world (System). Right now, I am also bullish. I mean why not? Mark-to-Model sounds great to me (Or we can just call it “I will price my assets as I like and you give me money”…. I’ll gladly take the money. This methodology does have the ability to bring the market back along with some other shams. However, the real question is for how long? In fact, the system is and has always been a game….. no matter what type of system is being used. What matters is ones ability to understand the game and exploit opportunities faster and better than the next player. Up or down does not matter…… as long as we understand which way it will go and why. I suggest reading up on Developement Economics, WTO, IMF, Washington Consensus, International Economics, Middle Eastern History, Monetary Policy History of the U.S. (The Fed etc..), Accounting (FASB, SEC, Emerging Issues Task Force, etc..), Finance (Net Capital Rule, Leverage, etc..), and most importantly, Political Economy (Adam Smith, and the rest (Too many to list). I am no tight ass my friend…..I just know my stuff.</p>
<p>Thanks all,</p>
<p>Economics 101<br />
(Still a student at a public school (University). Business Finance (Major), International Economics (Minor), Political Economy (Minor), Middle Eastern Studies (Upper Cluster),…..but of course I have read many of the works from fancy schools like Harvard, Yale, Cambridge, Chicago, etc..)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
