<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Bank(er) vs. Bad Bank(ers)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/good-banker-vs-bad-bankers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/good-banker-vs-bad-bankers/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:14:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dunnage</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/good-banker-vs-bad-bankers/comment-page-1/#comment-161620</link>
		<dc:creator>dunnage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 01:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23285#comment-161620</guid>
		<description>I think you need to distinguish between the Money Centers or so-called Investment Banks vs. Commercial Banks.

Commercial Banks did use excessive leverage and they were not the source for sub-prime.  Yes, they will pay for their commercial loans -- and with all $ going to the few -- find that this crisis is extended exacerbating failure rate.  But Banks have always been there lending at the end of good times.  This time the resources of the world are inaccessible but to the few.  As far as our Treasury is concerned the only difference between a regional bank and the UAW is deposits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you need to distinguish between the Money Centers or so-called Investment Banks vs. Commercial Banks.</p>
<p>Commercial Banks did use excessive leverage and they were not the source for sub-prime.  Yes, they will pay for their commercial loans &#8212; and with all $ going to the few &#8212; find that this crisis is extended exacerbating failure rate.  But Banks have always been there lending at the end of good times.  This time the resources of the world are inaccessible but to the few.  As far as our Treasury is concerned the only difference between a regional bank and the UAW is deposits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftback</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/good-banker-vs-bad-bankers/comment-page-1/#comment-160495</link>
		<dc:creator>leftback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23285#comment-160495</guid>
		<description>@Lori: A sham? Apparently so. Tiny Tim is delaying the release of the review of The Stressed Ones.

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/04/treasury-to-delay-reporting-bank-stress.html

We are starting to hear more and more honesty and sanity all over the media. The wall is crumbling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lori: A sham? Apparently so. Tiny Tim is delaying the release of the review of The Stressed Ones.</p>
<p><a href="http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/04/treasury-to-delay-reporting-bank-stress.html" rel="nofollow">http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/04/treasury-to-delay-reporting-bank-stress.html</a></p>
<p>We are starting to hear more and more honesty and sanity all over the media. The wall is crumbling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FromLori</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/good-banker-vs-bad-bankers/comment-page-1/#comment-160424</link>
		<dc:creator>FromLori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23285#comment-160424</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why that did not come out correctly so in an effort to make it easier for readers one more try here...

Geithner’s Stress Test “A Complete Sham,” Former Federal Bank Regulator Says

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/225897/Geithner&#039;s-Stress-Test-&quot;A-Complete-Sham&quot;-Former-Federal-Bank-Regulator-Says?tickers=UBS,C,BAC,XLF,SKF,FAS?sec=topStories&amp;pos=9&amp;asset=TBD&amp;ccode=TBD


William K. Black it was Fraud

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/watch.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why that did not come out correctly so in an effort to make it easier for readers one more try here&#8230;</p>
<p>Geithner’s Stress Test “A Complete Sham,” Former Federal Bank Regulator Says</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/225897/Geithner" rel="nofollow">http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/225897/Geithner</a>&#8217;s-Stress-Test-&#8221;A-Complete-Sham&#8221;-Former-Federal-Bank-Regulator-Says?tickers=UBS,C,BAC,XLF,SKF,FAS?sec=topStories&amp;pos=9&amp;asset=TBD&amp;ccode=TBD</p>
<p>William K. Black it was Fraud</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/watch.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/watch.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FromLori</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/good-banker-vs-bad-bankers/comment-page-1/#comment-160420</link>
		<dc:creator>FromLori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23285#comment-160420</guid>
		<description>Geithner&#039;s Stress Test &quot;A Complete Sham,&quot; Former Federal Bank Regulator Says

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/225897/Geithner&#039;s-Stress-Test-&quot;A-Complete-Sham&quot;-Former-Federal-Bank-Regulator-Says?tickers=UBS,C,BAC,XLF,SKF,FAS?sec=topStories&amp;pos=9&amp;asset=TBD&amp;ccode=TBD

William K. Black it was Fraud

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/watch.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geithner&#8217;s Stress Test &#8220;A Complete Sham,&#8221; Former Federal Bank Regulator Says</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/225897/Geithner" rel="nofollow">http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/225897/Geithner</a>&#8217;s-Stress-Test-&#8221;A-Complete-Sham&#8221;-Former-Federal-Bank-Regulator-Says?tickers=UBS,C,BAC,XLF,SKF,FAS?sec=topStories&amp;pos=9&amp;asset=TBD&amp;ccode=TBD</p>
<p>William K. Black it was Fraud</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/watch.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/watch.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usphoenix</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/good-banker-vs-bad-bankers/comment-page-1/#comment-160335</link>
		<dc:creator>usphoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23285#comment-160335</guid>
		<description>Group think not needed.  Beal Bank - yes.  

The Beal Bank key to me is the absence of a figurehead board and Wall Street pressures for current quarter performance.  

See, there are small remaining pockets of sanity hiding out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Group think not needed.  Beal Bank &#8211; yes.  </p>
<p>The Beal Bank key to me is the absence of a figurehead board and Wall Street pressures for current quarter performance.  </p>
<p>See, there are small remaining pockets of sanity hiding out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftback</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/good-banker-vs-bad-bankers/comment-page-1/#comment-160322</link>
		<dc:creator>leftback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23285#comment-160322</guid>
		<description>If you look at the Baltic Dry, credit spreads and the P/E ratio on the S&amp;P 500 it’s not a pretty picture.
You scared me over to the Dark Side, Jack.

With regard to Andy Beal, it would be great to see an environment where good judgement is rewarded.
In order for that to be maximized, we have to begin to allow those who made egregious errors to fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at the Baltic Dry, credit spreads and the P/E ratio on the S&amp;P 500 it’s not a pretty picture.<br />
You scared me over to the Dark Side, Jack.</p>
<p>With regard to Andy Beal, it would be great to see an environment where good judgement is rewarded.<br />
In order for that to be maximized, we have to begin to allow those who made egregious errors to fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rktbrkr</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/good-banker-vs-bad-bankers/comment-page-1/#comment-160287</link>
		<dc:creator>rktbrkr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23285#comment-160287</guid>
		<description>Tiny Tim&#039;s Cash for Trash program ain&#039;t gaining traction. Whats Plan B? 100% non-recourse funding?

Lackluster response to Fed, Treasury programs. The Treasury delayed the deadline for investors to join its Public-Private Investment Program and loosened some of the program&#039;s guidelines. Officials said they&#039;re trying to make it easier for firms to participate in the legacy securities portion of the program, but others wonder if officials are giving themselves more time to find firms who want to participate at all. Separately, participation in the Federal Reserve&#039;s TALF program has remained lackluster. Wary of legislative interference and hiring curbs, only two issuers have put together about $1.4B of TALF-eligible bonds heading into the Fed&#039;s deadline today, even worse than last month&#039;s disappointing $4.7B in loans. (Read the Treasury&#039;s Updated Guidance on the PPIP)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tiny Tim&#8217;s Cash for Trash program ain&#8217;t gaining traction. Whats Plan B? 100% non-recourse funding?</p>
<p>Lackluster response to Fed, Treasury programs. The Treasury delayed the deadline for investors to join its Public-Private Investment Program and loosened some of the program&#8217;s guidelines. Officials said they&#8217;re trying to make it easier for firms to participate in the legacy securities portion of the program, but others wonder if officials are giving themselves more time to find firms who want to participate at all. Separately, participation in the Federal Reserve&#8217;s TALF program has remained lackluster. Wary of legislative interference and hiring curbs, only two issuers have put together about $1.4B of TALF-eligible bonds heading into the Fed&#8217;s deadline today, even worse than last month&#8217;s disappointing $4.7B in loans. (Read the Treasury&#8217;s Updated Guidance on the PPIP)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
