<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Puff Up Earnings, Goldman Sachs Style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/how-to-puff-up-earnings-goldman-sachs-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/how-to-puff-up-earnings-goldman-sachs-style/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:28:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 'Better' Doesn't Mean 'Good' &#124; Jutia Group</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/how-to-puff-up-earnings-goldman-sachs-style/comment-page-2/#comment-166560</link>
		<dc:creator>'Better' Doesn't Mean 'Good' &#124; Jutia Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23677#comment-166560</guid>
		<description>[...] to Congressional pressure on mark-to-market rules, and ignore the fact that Goldman basically disappeared December 2008 as far as it was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Congressional pressure on mark-to-market rules, and ignore the fact that Goldman basically disappeared December 2008 as far as it was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wie man Verluste zum Verschwinden bringt - zeitenwende.ch</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/how-to-puff-up-earnings-goldman-sachs-style/comment-page-2/#comment-165432</link>
		<dc:creator>Wie man Verluste zum Verschwinden bringt - zeitenwende.ch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23677#comment-165432</guid>
		<description>[...] Aber daran haperts bekanntermassen ein bisschen...Quelle: fairresearch Nach Goldman Sachs, welche einen Monat zum Verschwinden  gebracht haben, kommt jetzt also die Steigerung auf drei Monate bei der Dresdner Bank. Ein [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Aber daran haperts bekanntermassen ein bisschen&#8230;Quelle: fairresearch Nach Goldman Sachs, welche einen Monat zum Verschwinden  gebracht haben, kommt jetzt also die Steigerung auf drei Monate bei der Dresdner Bank. Ein [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrancoisT</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/how-to-puff-up-earnings-goldman-sachs-style/comment-page-2/#comment-162473</link>
		<dc:creator>FrancoisT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23677#comment-162473</guid>
		<description>&quot;Alexis Glick gave Goldman a fantastic blow-job on Money for Breakfast today. No sooner had she wiped her lips...&quot;

It&#039;d be more accurate to say: &quot;No sooner had she swallowed...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Alexis Glick gave Goldman a fantastic blow-job on Money for Breakfast today. No sooner had she wiped her lips&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;d be more accurate to say: &#8220;No sooner had she swallowed&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pk7689</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/how-to-puff-up-earnings-goldman-sachs-style/comment-page-1/#comment-162431</link>
		<dc:creator>pk7689</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23677#comment-162431</guid>
		<description>By &quot;this&quot;, I of course mean the missing $-1 billion dollar month. Of course, this is yet another reason that earnings means nothing for banks in this environment: it is all about the balance sheet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By &#8220;this&#8221;, I of course mean the missing $-1 billion dollar month. Of course, this is yet another reason that earnings means nothing for banks in this environment: it is all about the balance sheet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pk7689</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/how-to-puff-up-earnings-goldman-sachs-style/comment-page-1/#comment-162430</link>
		<dc:creator>pk7689</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23677#comment-162430</guid>
		<description>Actually, there is a very good (and simple) reason for the change. Goldman is now a bank holding company. The Federal Reserve is requiring them to sync their quarter with all the other BHCs. 

The real issue is that most of the main-line financial press is once-again failing their duty to the public by ignoring this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there is a very good (and simple) reason for the change. Goldman is now a bank holding company. The Federal Reserve is requiring them to sync their quarter with all the other BHCs. </p>
<p>The real issue is that most of the main-line financial press is once-again failing their duty to the public by ignoring this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FromLori</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/how-to-puff-up-earnings-goldman-sachs-style/comment-page-1/#comment-162311</link>
		<dc:creator>FromLori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23677#comment-162311</guid>
		<description>Fantastic piece!!  All Hail Barry for putting out the truth for more information on the  $$$ size of the problem...

http://bluelori.blogspot.com/2009/04/all-hail-government-sachs.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic piece!!  All Hail Barry for putting out the truth for more information on the  $$$ size of the problem&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://bluelori.blogspot.com/2009/04/all-hail-government-sachs.html" rel="nofollow">http://bluelori.blogspot.com/2009/04/all-hail-government-sachs.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transor Z</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/how-to-puff-up-earnings-goldman-sachs-style/comment-page-1/#comment-162295</link>
		<dc:creator>Transor Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23677#comment-162295</guid>
		<description>Today&#039;s op-ed page in WSJ has a response to GS&#039;s letter:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123975976173619467.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s op-ed page in WSJ has a response to GS&#8217;s letter:<br />
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123975976173619467.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123975976173619467.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Golis</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/how-to-puff-up-earnings-goldman-sachs-style/comment-page-1/#comment-162292</link>
		<dc:creator>Golis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23677#comment-162292</guid>
		<description>1) GS reported after the close on 04/13, stock was down 11.5% from close to close on 04/14. The talking heads and major media sources put this on the dilution of the $5bn offering or the fact that the stock had doubled since the march lows. Whatever we want to believe was the cause, the market acted appropriately.
2) The only thing I hate more than IB cartel and it&#039;s control of the corporate world, is the fact that people don&#039;t do their own work, read the press releases and filings and figure this stuff out themselves. It&#039;s only your own fault if you didn&#039;t do the work to see this. People love to blame their own lack of hard work and intelligence on others. Doing the work is 90% of the game when it comes to investing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) GS reported after the close on 04/13, stock was down 11.5% from close to close on 04/14. The talking heads and major media sources put this on the dilution of the $5bn offering or the fact that the stock had doubled since the march lows. Whatever we want to believe was the cause, the market acted appropriately.<br />
2) The only thing I hate more than IB cartel and it&#8217;s control of the corporate world, is the fact that people don&#8217;t do their own work, read the press releases and filings and figure this stuff out themselves. It&#8217;s only your own fault if you didn&#8217;t do the work to see this. People love to blame their own lack of hard work and intelligence on others. Doing the work is 90% of the game when it comes to investing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eren</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/how-to-puff-up-earnings-goldman-sachs-style/comment-page-1/#comment-162265</link>
		<dc:creator>eren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23677#comment-162265</guid>
		<description>Pool Shark:
you&#039;ve got too much mercury in your body. kidding.

thanks for the optionpain. I was doing very same charts the long way. it made my life so easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pool Shark:<br />
you&#8217;ve got too much mercury in your body. kidding.</p>
<p>thanks for the optionpain. I was doing very same charts the long way. it made my life so easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmenRa</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/how-to-puff-up-earnings-goldman-sachs-style/comment-page-1/#comment-162246</link>
		<dc:creator>AmenRa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=23677#comment-162246</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://boombustblog.com/Reggie-Middleton/915-Reggie-Middleton-Breaks-Ranks-with-the-Crowd-Once-Again-and-Says-Goldman-is-Overvalued-by-Far.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Reggie Middleton on Goldman Sachs earnings&lt;/a&gt; has a good breakdown of GS earnings and how they have more risk than people expect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://boombustblog.com/Reggie-Middleton/915-Reggie-Middleton-Breaks-Ranks-with-the-Crowd-Once-Again-and-Says-Goldman-is-Overvalued-by-Far.html" rel="nofollow">Reggie Middleton on Goldman Sachs earnings</a> has a good breakdown of GS earnings and how they have more risk than people expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

