<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Magic Bank Profits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/magic-bank-profits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/magic-bank-profits/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/magic-bank-profits/comment-page-2/#comment-163770</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24069#comment-163770</guid>
		<description>&quot;his number one priority, or better yet, his number one responsibility, is to protect the US Treasury market.&quot;

Yes, definitely a good point to ponder.   It is his last line of defense and it must be funded above all other markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;his number one priority, or better yet, his number one responsibility, is to protect the US Treasury market.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, definitely a good point to ponder.   It is his last line of defense and it must be funded above all other markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben22</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/magic-bank-profits/comment-page-2/#comment-163762</link>
		<dc:creator>ben22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24069#comment-163762</guid>
		<description>test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben22</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/magic-bank-profits/comment-page-2/#comment-163754</link>
		<dc:creator>ben22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24069#comment-163754</guid>
		<description>One thing is clear: The “traditional” individual investors are not present in the same numbers the were in the 1990s 

This is from BR above.

it seems that is evident when looking at a chart of the DOW in Gold terms.

It&#039;s like an 84% decline right now since 1999-2000.

Traditional individual investors are also a lot more likely to embrace what were once &quot;alternatives&quot; such as commodities than they were, say just a couple years ago.  Just my opinion but I think I&#039;m right.  If someone can prove I&#039;m wrong, then I&#039;m wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing is clear: The “traditional” individual investors are not present in the same numbers the were in the 1990s </p>
<p>This is from BR above.</p>
<p>it seems that is evident when looking at a chart of the DOW in Gold terms.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like an 84% decline right now since 1999-2000.</p>
<p>Traditional individual investors are also a lot more likely to embrace what were once &#8220;alternatives&#8221; such as commodities than they were, say just a couple years ago.  Just my opinion but I think I&#8217;m right.  If someone can prove I&#8217;m wrong, then I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben22</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/magic-bank-profits/comment-page-2/#comment-163751</link>
		<dc:creator>ben22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24069#comment-163751</guid>
		<description>@ franklin, 

You would make that argument right after you reveal that after the new $40 dollars in your check, you immediately find a way to spend almost all of it.  Now THAT is what I call American baby!

good for you man.  I suppose if I saw all the &quot;improvements&quot; you did, I&#039;d be spending more too.

to comment on the discussion above where BR thinks rob &quot;could&quot; be right about retail getting suckered back into the banks.  BR, rob is exactly right, that&#039;s what&#039;s going on right now.  There is also a fresh batch of papers going out this quarter from Fidelity, Vanguard, Oppenhiemer, Columbia, etc. about how market timing will destroy you and then they go on and discuss lots of compelling data on some fancy charts, all of which just so happen to begin in the year 1982.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ franklin, </p>
<p>You would make that argument right after you reveal that after the new $40 dollars in your check, you immediately find a way to spend almost all of it.  Now THAT is what I call American baby!</p>
<p>good for you man.  I suppose if I saw all the &#8220;improvements&#8221; you did, I&#8217;d be spending more too.</p>
<p>to comment on the discussion above where BR thinks rob &#8220;could&#8221; be right about retail getting suckered back into the banks.  BR, rob is exactly right, that&#8217;s what&#8217;s going on right now.  There is also a fresh batch of papers going out this quarter from Fidelity, Vanguard, Oppenhiemer, Columbia, etc. about how market timing will destroy you and then they go on and discuss lots of compelling data on some fancy charts, all of which just so happen to begin in the year 1982.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnbougearel</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/magic-bank-profits/comment-page-2/#comment-163750</link>
		<dc:creator>johnbougearel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24069#comment-163750</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think investors were fooled by it at all. The banksters provided excellent visibility and a reasonable degree of certituded and safety for us to trade the market on the long side into peak financial earnings season. After BAC reported, visibility decreased, and uncertainty increased a bit. 

However, if one looks out at the reports out this week and next, we see there is anecdotal signs we may see some &#039;green shoots&#039; you know, them weeds Bernanke was alluding to a few weeks back. Yep, we should see some green shoots, but when momma&#039;s green shoots grow up to be weeds (cowboys),  dats when we gots problems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think investors were fooled by it at all. The banksters provided excellent visibility and a reasonable degree of certituded and safety for us to trade the market on the long side into peak financial earnings season. After BAC reported, visibility decreased, and uncertainty increased a bit. </p>
<p>However, if one looks out at the reports out this week and next, we see there is anecdotal signs we may see some &#8216;green shoots&#8217; you know, them weeds Bernanke was alluding to a few weeks back. Yep, we should see some green shoots, but when momma&#8217;s green shoots grow up to be weeds (cowboys),  dats when we gots problems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emmanuel117</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/magic-bank-profits/comment-page-2/#comment-163723</link>
		<dc:creator>emmanuel117</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24069#comment-163723</guid>
		<description>testing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>testing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftback</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/magic-bank-profits/comment-page-2/#comment-163721</link>
		<dc:creator>leftback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24069#comment-163721</guid>
		<description>Assuming this sell-off continues in the XLF, how will they ever persuade anyone to buy bank stocks again?
We are finally starting to see much more bifurcation between the financials and the rest of the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming this sell-off continues in the XLF, how will they ever persuade anyone to buy bank stocks again?<br />
We are finally starting to see much more bifurcation between the financials and the rest of the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: call me ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/magic-bank-profits/comment-page-2/#comment-163720</link>
		<dc:creator>call me ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24069#comment-163720</guid>
		<description>MRegan-

wow!   that is a incredible amount of info-  man-  I knew you had the inside track on Peru-  I will need to print and peruse at a later time  so I can take it all in-


thanks-  i really appreciate it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MRegan-</p>
<p>wow!   that is a incredible amount of info-  man-  I knew you had the inside track on Peru-  I will need to print and peruse at a later time  so I can take it all in-</p>
<p>thanks-  i really appreciate it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: call me ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/magic-bank-profits/comment-page-2/#comment-163718</link>
		<dc:creator>call me ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24069#comment-163718</guid>
		<description>gregh-

thanks for the input-  all sounds great-  I am always into cheap destinations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gregh-</p>
<p>thanks for the input-  all sounds great-  I am always into cheap destinations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MRegan</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/magic-bank-profits/comment-page-2/#comment-163717</link>
		<dc:creator>MRegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24069#comment-163717</guid>
		<description>Ahab-

I was joking. Regarding Peru:

Trujillo- go see Chan-Chan, las huacas, el templo el brujo. Don&#039;t go to Huanchaco alone, go to Chiclayo and find a way to get to Batán Grande. BG was a huge hacienda (caña de azúcar) owned by the Aurich family, it was also the center of the Siccan culture, the largest necropolis in LatAm can be found there. Go to Cajamarca-Baños del Inca, Ancash--Conchucos Chavin de Huántar (the route from Pativilca to Huancabamba- Caraz, Anta Huaraz takes you through Cañón del Pato- look it up-fascinanting, if you are adventurous go to Chacahapoyas and check out the Kuélap ruins and the Pozo de Yanayacu, if you are really adventurous try to get to Santiago de Chuco and ask some one to take you Cachicadán. If you get there dile hola a viudita de mi parte,

Of course Lima and Cuzco and Machu Picchu you&#039;ll love it. In Cuzco I have a pal named Chalo who owns a 57 chevy (he was a mechanic briefly in Germany and now works as a tour guide for Teutons) I can get you his contact info
Peruvian cuisine is delightful and delicious. Got to La Mar- for the shnutty- or go to CantaRana in Barranco or the place some call El Catamarán (jajaja)
In Lima go to Barranco and go to De Rompe y Raja- peña or Don Porfirio da lo mismo 
Go to Arequipa. My father-in-law runs the restoration project in that city which was founded in the 1540&#039;s (Arequipa comes from Quechua and it means &#039;Yes you may dwell there&#039; more or less.  pheww- there&#039;s more- want it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahab-</p>
<p>I was joking. Regarding Peru:</p>
<p>Trujillo- go see Chan-Chan, las huacas, el templo el brujo. Don&#8217;t go to Huanchaco alone, go to Chiclayo and find a way to get to Batán Grande. BG was a huge hacienda (caña de azúcar) owned by the Aurich family, it was also the center of the Siccan culture, the largest necropolis in LatAm can be found there. Go to Cajamarca-Baños del Inca, Ancash&#8211;Conchucos Chavin de Huántar (the route from Pativilca to Huancabamba- Caraz, Anta Huaraz takes you through Cañón del Pato- look it up-fascinanting, if you are adventurous go to Chacahapoyas and check out the Kuélap ruins and the Pozo de Yanayacu, if you are really adventurous try to get to Santiago de Chuco and ask some one to take you Cachicadán. If you get there dile hola a viudita de mi parte,</p>
<p>Of course Lima and Cuzco and Machu Picchu you&#8217;ll love it. In Cuzco I have a pal named Chalo who owns a 57 chevy (he was a mechanic briefly in Germany and now works as a tour guide for Teutons) I can get you his contact info<br />
Peruvian cuisine is delightful and delicious. Got to La Mar- for the shnutty- or go to CantaRana in Barranco or the place some call El Catamarán (jajaja)<br />
In Lima go to Barranco and go to De Rompe y Raja- peña or Don Porfirio da lo mismo<br />
Go to Arequipa. My father-in-law runs the restoration project in that city which was founded in the 1540&#8242;s (Arequipa comes from Quechua and it means &#8216;Yes you may dwell there&#8217; more or less.  pheww- there&#8217;s more- want it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

