<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Next Troubled Bank: The Fed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/our-next-troubled-bank-the-fed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/our-next-troubled-bank-the-fed/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:10:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mikaeel</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/our-next-troubled-bank-the-fed/comment-page-2/#comment-165842</link>
		<dc:creator>mikaeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24710#comment-165842</guid>
		<description>John Wayne is like an analogy for our federal reserve system: a dead actor rumored to have dodo stuck in his colon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Wayne is like an analogy for our federal reserve system: a dead actor rumored to have dodo stuck in his colon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blick Log » Stiglitz et al zu toxischen Assets, Stress Tests und mehr</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/our-next-troubled-bank-the-fed/comment-page-2/#comment-165786</link>
		<dc:creator>Blick Log » Stiglitz et al zu toxischen Assets, Stress Tests und mehr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24710#comment-165786</guid>
		<description>[...] BP: Our Next Troubled Bank: The Fed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BP: Our Next Troubled Bank: The Fed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tradeking13</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/our-next-troubled-bank-the-fed/comment-page-2/#comment-165784</link>
		<dc:creator>tradeking13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24710#comment-165784</guid>
		<description>Hopefully this takes down the Fed.  Good riddance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully this takes down the Fed.  Good riddance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delliott</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/our-next-troubled-bank-the-fed/comment-page-2/#comment-165767</link>
		<dc:creator>delliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24710#comment-165767</guid>
		<description>The debt will be addressed in one of four ways: 1) taxes will be raised to pay for it; 2) the treasury will default; 3) the debt will be directly monetized by the Fed or otherwise reduced in real value through inflation; 4) the vast profits from the Fed&#039;s eventual sale of all the Maiden Lane and other new balance sheet &quot;assets&quot;

The explosion of the Fed&#039;s balance sheet means 3 is more likely than 1 and is already happening at a pretty good clip.  It does not mean that the debt is going to be larger through the Fed&#039;s &quot;bad investments.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The debt will be addressed in one of four ways: 1) taxes will be raised to pay for it; 2) the treasury will default; 3) the debt will be directly monetized by the Fed or otherwise reduced in real value through inflation; 4) the vast profits from the Fed&#8217;s eventual sale of all the Maiden Lane and other new balance sheet &#8220;assets&#8221;</p>
<p>The explosion of the Fed&#8217;s balance sheet means 3 is more likely than 1 and is already happening at a pretty good clip.  It does not mean that the debt is going to be larger through the Fed&#8217;s &#8220;bad investments.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FromLori</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/our-next-troubled-bank-the-fed/comment-page-2/#comment-165724</link>
		<dc:creator>FromLori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24710#comment-165724</guid>
		<description>Add another $5 Trillion in Fannie/Freddie Fraud to the Feds balance sheets...

http://bluelori.blogspot.com/2009/04/fanniefreddie-5-trillion-fraud.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add another $5 Trillion in Fannie/Freddie Fraud to the Feds balance sheets&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://bluelori.blogspot.com/2009/04/fanniefreddie-5-trillion-fraud.html" rel="nofollow">http://bluelori.blogspot.com/2009/04/fanniefreddie-5-trillion-fraud.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Schott</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/our-next-troubled-bank-the-fed/comment-page-2/#comment-165697</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Schott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24710#comment-165697</guid>
		<description>F411 - I am starting to understand where you are coming from.  Finally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F411 &#8211; I am starting to understand where you are coming from.  Finally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Super-Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/our-next-troubled-bank-the-fed/comment-page-2/#comment-165691</link>
		<dc:creator>Super-Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24710#comment-165691</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;When the Fed goes bankrupt, nobody will come to the auction.&lt;/i&gt;

There will be nothing for sale except broken illusions and squandered credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>When the Fed goes bankrupt, nobody will come to the auction.</i></p>
<p>There will be nothing for sale except broken illusions and squandered credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/our-next-troubled-bank-the-fed/comment-page-2/#comment-165690</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24710#comment-165690</guid>
		<description>delliott, 

you&#039;re missing the fact that those that fouled-up get patched-up, and you get stuck with the bill..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>delliott, </p>
<p>you&#8217;re missing the fact that those that fouled-up get patched-up, and you get stuck with the bill..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/our-next-troubled-bank-the-fed/comment-page-2/#comment-165689</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24710#comment-165689</guid>
		<description>When the Fed goes bankrupt, nobody will come to the auction. Or vica-versa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Fed goes bankrupt, nobody will come to the auction. Or vica-versa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delliott</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/our-next-troubled-bank-the-fed/comment-page-1/#comment-165687</link>
		<dc:creator>delliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=24710#comment-165687</guid>
		<description>yea adeev, I do not understand these comments.  When you talk about the Fed&#039;s leverage, who do they think the Fed  borrowed from or need to pay back?  The only problem here is by purchasing assets that have little value, the Fed has injected a lot of money into the system that they will not be able to pull back out by selling the assets.  This is theoretically inflationary, but a lot of things the last 8 years have been theoretically inflationary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea adeev, I do not understand these comments.  When you talk about the Fed&#8217;s leverage, who do they think the Fed  borrowed from or need to pay back?  The only problem here is by purchasing assets that have little value, the Fed has injected a lot of money into the system that they will not be able to pull back out by selling the assets.  This is theoretically inflationary, but a lot of things the last 8 years have been theoretically inflationary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
