<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: West Coast Open Thread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/west-coast-open-thread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/west-coast-open-thread/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/west-coast-open-thread/comment-page-2/#comment-159079</link>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22982#comment-159079</guid>
		<description>Too good not to post:

What&#039;s the Difference between Maddoff and U.S. Social Security?
by Paul Kasriel   March 31, 2009

Coercion. Both depend, or in the case of Maddoff, depended, on being able to get new contributors into the scheme in order to pay off the previous contributors. The Social Security Administration has the power of the law to force new contributors into its scheme. Maddoff did not have the power of the law to force new contributors into his scheme, therefore, he has been accused of breaking the law. Just another example of it&#039;s good to be the king.

http://www.safehaven.com/article-12973.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too good not to post:</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the Difference between Maddoff and U.S. Social Security?<br />
by Paul Kasriel   March 31, 2009</p>
<p>Coercion. Both depend, or in the case of Maddoff, depended, on being able to get new contributors into the scheme in order to pay off the previous contributors. The Social Security Administration has the power of the law to force new contributors into its scheme. Maddoff did not have the power of the law to force new contributors into his scheme, therefore, he has been accused of breaking the law. Just another example of it&#8217;s good to be the king.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.safehaven.com/article-12973.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.safehaven.com/article-12973.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: batmando</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/west-coast-open-thread/comment-page-2/#comment-159067</link>
		<dc:creator>batmando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22982#comment-159067</guid>
		<description>@ MRegan  at 12:00 am

Question: can you all see a comment I made at 10.54?

I see it @ 10:54 and the re-post @ 12:05</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ MRegan  at 12:00 am</p>
<p>Question: can you all see a comment I made at 10.54?</p>
<p>I see it @ 10:54 and the re-post @ 12:05</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftback</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/west-coast-open-thread/comment-page-2/#comment-159065</link>
		<dc:creator>leftback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22982#comment-159065</guid>
		<description>An extraordinarily profitable morning for Schadenfreude Asset Management.
Factory orders and crude seem to have gotten the recovery/reflation memo. :-)

Watch out for the NFP/earnings banana skin. I am already looking at entry points on the Dark Side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An extraordinarily profitable morning for Schadenfreude Asset Management.<br />
Factory orders and crude seem to have gotten the recovery/reflation memo. :-)</p>
<p>Watch out for the NFP/earnings banana skin. I am already looking at entry points on the Dark Side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/west-coast-open-thread/comment-page-2/#comment-159051</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22982#comment-159051</guid>
		<description>reflation is just nice way of saying :theft of purchasing power, but, yes, ya got to bet on it occuring, there are &#039;Politicians&#039; about, afterall..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reflation is just nice way of saying :theft of purchasing power, but, yes, ya got to bet on it occuring, there are &#8216;Politicians&#8217; about, afterall..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/west-coast-open-thread/comment-page-2/#comment-159048</link>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22982#comment-159048</guid>
		<description>airtrader, you left out the $usd in your considerations...

ben22, thank goodness you are in the reflation camp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>airtrader, you left out the $usd in your considerations&#8230;</p>
<p>ben22, thank goodness you are in the reflation camp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/west-coast-open-thread/comment-page-2/#comment-159047</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22982#comment-159047</guid>
		<description>ben22, 

this: &quot;Why do so many seem to ask what the news was to cause markets, or futures to be up.&quot;
is a good Q,

I&#039;d just say that peep are a curious folk.  and, seeming answers, soothe.

and, this:  &quot;All bear markets have rallies like this. I thought everyone was aware by now of the 50% rally during the GD, there has been countless mention of this and other rallies during bear markets on this site for the last year.&quot;  - is certainly true, much fat has been chewed over the topic of &quot;Bear Market rallies&quot;..

and, re: simons, just shows he&#039;s smart enough not to get into it in .mixed company.  the ridicule he would face by broaching the topic, isn&#039;t worth it..

going fwd: one really needs to pay attention to the G-20..Wall Street, as we knew it, is totally Dead, and it ain&#039;t ever coming back..Braces and Czech Strippers, notwithstanding..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ben22, </p>
<p>this: &#8220;Why do so many seem to ask what the news was to cause markets, or futures to be up.&#8221;<br />
is a good Q,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d just say that peep are a curious folk.  and, seeming answers, soothe.</p>
<p>and, this:  &#8220;All bear markets have rallies like this. I thought everyone was aware by now of the 50% rally during the GD, there has been countless mention of this and other rallies during bear markets on this site for the last year.&#8221;  &#8211; is certainly true, much fat has been chewed over the topic of &#8220;Bear Market rallies&#8221;..</p>
<p>and, re: simons, just shows he&#8217;s smart enough not to get into it in .mixed company.  the ridicule he would face by broaching the topic, isn&#8217;t worth it..</p>
<p>going fwd: one really needs to pay attention to the G-20..Wall Street, as we knew it, is totally Dead, and it ain&#8217;t ever coming back..Braces and Czech Strippers, notwithstanding..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben22</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/west-coast-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-159034</link>
		<dc:creator>ben22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22982#comment-159034</guid>
		<description>Mike in Nola, 

Did you read Faber&#039;s latest?  I did last night.  I&#039;m trying to be careful reading him because I&#039;m in the reflation camp and clearly so is he.  That said, he made some compelling points in the most recent letter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike in Nola, </p>
<p>Did you read Faber&#8217;s latest?  I did last night.  I&#8217;m trying to be careful reading him because I&#8217;m in the reflation camp and clearly so is he.  That said, he made some compelling points in the most recent letter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben22</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/west-coast-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-159032</link>
		<dc:creator>ben22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22982#comment-159032</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m being overly critical here, or maybe it&#039;s because I can&#039;t get the &quot;is it fun being a billionaire&quot; question out of my head but carl (karl?) on CNBC asks the most worthless questions out of any of them.  Does he prepare for these interviews?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m being overly critical here, or maybe it&#8217;s because I can&#8217;t get the &#8220;is it fun being a billionaire&#8221; question out of my head but carl (karl?) on CNBC asks the most worthless questions out of any of them.  Does he prepare for these interviews?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Nola</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/west-coast-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-159031</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Nola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22982#comment-159031</guid>
		<description>aitrader:  I&#039;m sure they&#039;re anticipating all the deman gengerated from the coming boom :)  Marc Faber has repeatedly said that the amount of money being thrown at the economy has to have some effect on the markets. Since no one is actually going to use it for business purposes because they are too scared, it will probably just cause some bubblets as the banks use their tarp to speculate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aitrader:  I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;re anticipating all the deman gengerated from the coming boom :)  Marc Faber has repeatedly said that the amount of money being thrown at the economy has to have some effect on the markets. Since no one is actually going to use it for business purposes because they are too scared, it will probably just cause some bubblets as the banks use their tarp to speculate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben22</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/west-coast-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-159030</link>
		<dc:creator>ben22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=22982#comment-159030</guid>
		<description>@ MarkH

Mark, a couple weeks ago I posted on here that J. simons was asked in Bloomberg markets mag about a year and half ago about a study he conducted regarding sun spots and the impact they had on markets.  He refused to comment on it, which I thought was interesting.

Why do so many seem to ask what the news was to cause markets, or futures to be up.  All bear markets have rallies like this.  I thought everyone was aware by now of the 50% rally during the GD, there has been countless mention of this and other rallies during bear markets on this site for the last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ MarkH</p>
<p>Mark, a couple weeks ago I posted on here that J. simons was asked in Bloomberg markets mag about a year and half ago about a study he conducted regarding sun spots and the impact they had on markets.  He refused to comment on it, which I thought was interesting.</p>
<p>Why do so many seem to ask what the news was to cause markets, or futures to be up.  All bear markets have rallies like this.  I thought everyone was aware by now of the 50% rally during the GD, there has been countless mention of this and other rallies during bear markets on this site for the last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

