<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where Are the Buyers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:22:40 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mortgage Rates Down, But Are Americans Able To Tap Them? &#124; Home Loan Focus</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-165202</link>
		<dc:creator>Mortgage Rates Down, But Are Americans Able To Tap Them? &#124; Home Loan Focus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/#comment-165202</guid>
		<description>[...] to a comment in response to a posting by Peter Boockvar on  The Big Picture blog  the real issue at hand is the new, stricter lending standards. There are fewer and fewer loan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to a comment in response to a posting by Peter Boockvar on  The Big Picture blog  the real issue at hand is the new, stricter lending standards. There are fewer and fewer loan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mortgage Rates Down, But Are Americans Able To Tap Them? : RMI Atlantic</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-165047</link>
		<dc:creator>Mortgage Rates Down, But Are Americans Able To Tap Them? : RMI Atlantic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/#comment-165047</guid>
		<description>[...] to a comment in response to a posting by Peter Boockvar on  The Big Picture blog  the real issue at hand is the new, stricter lending standards. There are fewer and fewer loan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to a comment in response to a posting by Peter Boockvar on  The Big Picture blog  the real issue at hand is the new, stricter lending standards. There are fewer and fewer loan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mortgage Rates Down, But Are Americans Able To Tap Them? &#124; Mortgage 101 Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-164661</link>
		<dc:creator>Mortgage Rates Down, But Are Americans Able To Tap Them? &#124; Mortgage 101 Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/#comment-164661</guid>
		<description>[...] to a comment in response to a posting by Peter Boockvar on  The Big Picture blog  the real issue at hand is the new, stricter lending standards. There are fewer and fewer loan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to a comment in response to a posting by Peter Boockvar on  The Big Picture blog  the real issue at hand is the new, stricter lending standards. There are fewer and fewer loan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FromLori</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-164288</link>
		<dc:creator>FromLori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/#comment-164288</guid>
		<description>In the unemployment lines and at Bankruptcy court...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the unemployment lines and at Bankruptcy court&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danm</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-164256</link>
		<dc:creator>danm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/#comment-164256</guid>
		<description>I want the economy to turn around so everybody can get the opportunity to practice those values of hard work and savings.
------------------
The faster the economy turns around, the less there will be an incentive to value hard work and savings.

These values will only come back after some hardship is felt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want the economy to turn around so everybody can get the opportunity to practice those values of hard work and savings.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
The faster the economy turns around, the less there will be an incentive to value hard work and savings.</p>
<p>These values will only come back after some hardship is felt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeDude</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-164155</link>
		<dc:creator>DeDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/#comment-164155</guid>
		<description>I think CPJ13 has the real answer.  A lot of people who are fully capable of paying the loans are simply not able to come up with the downpayment or qualify under the current stringent guidelines.  If that is correct then the stimulus bills tax credit for new homowners will fail to do much for the housing market.  It also means that lower interest rates and/or lower prices will have minimal effects.  

Even though the previous “standards” were clearly a joke and had to be tightened, the problem is, just as with the banks, that you have to do it slowly to avoid creating havoc.  But how can we politically get to a point where F&amp;F can be allowed to be a little more irresponsible and then hand over the bill for such behaviour to Uncle Sam.  All this old fart moralizing about “saving” and “responsible behaviour” and “bla. bla. bla” may feel good for those practizing it, but it won’t turn the economy around or help any of us responsible people who see our house values cut in half and our jobs disappear.  I don’t give a s**t about moralitiy, I want the economy to turn around so everybody can get the opportunity to practice those values of hard work and savings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think CPJ13 has the real answer.  A lot of people who are fully capable of paying the loans are simply not able to come up with the downpayment or qualify under the current stringent guidelines.  If that is correct then the stimulus bills tax credit for new homowners will fail to do much for the housing market.  It also means that lower interest rates and/or lower prices will have minimal effects.  </p>
<p>Even though the previous “standards” were clearly a joke and had to be tightened, the problem is, just as with the banks, that you have to do it slowly to avoid creating havoc.  But how can we politically get to a point where F&amp;F can be allowed to be a little more irresponsible and then hand over the bill for such behaviour to Uncle Sam.  All this old fart moralizing about “saving” and “responsible behaviour” and “bla. bla. bla” may feel good for those practizing it, but it won’t turn the economy around or help any of us responsible people who see our house values cut in half and our jobs disappear.  I don’t give a s**t about moralitiy, I want the economy to turn around so everybody can get the opportunity to practice those values of hard work and savings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cttfinder</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-164054</link>
		<dc:creator>cttfinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/#comment-164054</guid>
		<description>OFHEO data suggests prices ticked higher my friend.

See Professor Perry&#039;s post:  Did The Housing Market Bottom in Late 2008? 

http://mjperry.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OFHEO data suggests prices ticked higher my friend.</p>
<p>See Professor Perry&#8217;s post:  Did The Housing Market Bottom in Late 2008? </p>
<p><a href="http://mjperry.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://mjperry.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How the Common Man Sees It</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-164036</link>
		<dc:creator>How the Common Man Sees It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/#comment-164036</guid>
		<description>Nice changeup Barry. The new site look is growing on me already. I don&#039;t miss the old one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice changeup Barry. The new site look is growing on me already. I don&#8217;t miss the old one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drollere</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-164020</link>
		<dc:creator>drollere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/#comment-164020</guid>
		<description>it costs more to buy today than to buy tomorrow. what&#039;s mysterious?

and financing criteria have been sharply strengthened. my local bank requires a dna swab, financial records back to 1974, and a federal database search. guess their serious about that creditworthiness thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it costs more to buy today than to buy tomorrow. what&#8217;s mysterious?</p>
<p>and financing criteria have been sharply strengthened. my local bank requires a dna swab, financial records back to 1974, and a federal database search. guess their serious about that creditworthiness thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-164002</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/where-the-buyers/#comment-164002</guid>
		<description>@CPJ13

SAVING for a downpayment. Bout time. The policy of giving 100% mortgages should never, under any circumstances, have taken place. If you can&#039;t afford a house, you rent. If you want one bad enough, find a way. A lot of people walking away from their mortgages now are doing so because they&#039;ve got no money into it. Why would they stay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CPJ13</p>
<p>SAVING for a downpayment. Bout time. The policy of giving 100% mortgages should never, under any circumstances, have taken place. If you can&#8217;t afford a house, you rent. If you want one bad enough, find a way. A lot of people walking away from their mortgages now are doing so because they&#8217;ve got no money into it. Why would they stay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
