Blaming/Crediting the PPT
Once again, the PPT gets credit for the rally:
Mad props to Richard Suttmeir for getting this right . . .
Hat tip ZeroHedge
Once again, the PPT gets credit for the rally:
Mad props to Richard Suttmeir for getting this right . . .
Hat tip ZeroHedge
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.
May 19th, 2009 at 6:16 pm
Jack MacHugh has also been on to this one. Where the banks lead so will we follow.
May 19th, 2009 at 6:17 pm
I’ll sure be visiting valueengine.com
May 19th, 2009 at 7:23 pm
Sounds like Dan Shaffer got it right. Richard Suttmeir? He’s talking about the market being undervalued 30% to 40% at the March lows, but now it’s overvalued after a 40% rise? Is this the kind of math that Lenny Dykstra learned from Mr. Suttmeir?