<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloomberg Radio 3:00 &#8211; 3:30</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/bloomberg-radio-300-330/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/bloomberg-radio-300-330/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmenRa</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/bloomberg-radio-300-330/comment-page-1/#comment-169903</link>
		<dc:creator>AmenRa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 03:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26083#comment-169903</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a good read. &quot;Green shoots or rose colored glasses&quot; by David Rosenberg over at ZH:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/05/green-shoots-or-rose-colored-glasses.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/05/green-shoots-or-rose-colored-glasses.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a good read. &#8220;Green shoots or rose colored glasses&#8221; by David Rosenberg over at ZH:<br />
<a href="http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/05/green-shoots-or-rose-colored-glasses.html" rel="nofollow">http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/05/green-shoots-or-rose-colored-glasses.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: call me ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/bloomberg-radio-300-330/comment-page-1/#comment-169900</link>
		<dc:creator>call me ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 02:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26083#comment-169900</guid>
		<description>Ace and Gary-

no kidding-  quite the payoff- if any company deserved to go down- it was Citi- the USG- I guess- will hold up that corpse for years to come-

keep it ambiguous</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ace and Gary-</p>
<p>no kidding-  quite the payoff- if any company deserved to go down- it was Citi- the USG- I guess- will hold up that corpse for years to come-</p>
<p>keep it ambiguous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stillaway</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/bloomberg-radio-300-330/comment-page-1/#comment-169897</link>
		<dc:creator>Stillaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 01:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26083#comment-169897</guid>
		<description>call me-

The lottery ticket world IS clueless. In this world going to .0161 and then $4 is an even bigger payoff.

&quot;say hi&quot; -- you mean Ace don&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>call me-</p>
<p>The lottery ticket world IS clueless. In this world going to .0161 and then $4 is an even bigger payoff.</p>
<p>&#8220;say hi&#8221; &#8212; you mean Ace don&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: call me ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/bloomberg-radio-300-330/comment-page-1/#comment-169890</link>
		<dc:creator>call me ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 01:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26083#comment-169890</guid>
		<description>Steve-

sometimes my fingers are typing before my mind catches up-  yes overbought-  weird on GM though-


Stillaway-

I see the 4 to 1 on C-  but-  still-  Citibank never said they were going to issue massive shares then do a reverse at 100 to 1 diluting the current shareholders to less then 1 cent a share-

that is what&#039;s known as clue in the detective world-   also-   say hi to LB for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve-</p>
<p>sometimes my fingers are typing before my mind catches up-  yes overbought-  weird on GM though-</p>
<p>Stillaway-</p>
<p>I see the 4 to 1 on C-  but-  still-  Citibank never said they were going to issue massive shares then do a reverse at 100 to 1 diluting the current shareholders to less then 1 cent a share-</p>
<p>that is what&#8217;s known as clue in the detective world-   also-   say hi to LB for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stillaway</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/bloomberg-radio-300-330/comment-page-1/#comment-169888</link>
		<dc:creator>Stillaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 00:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26083#comment-169888</guid>
		<description>@ ahab re GM stock.

Who wants it? People who also buy lottery tickets. Buying C at a $1 two months ago has paid off 4:1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ ahab re GM stock.</p>
<p>Who wants it? People who also buy lottery tickets. Buying C at a $1 two months ago has paid off 4:1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/bloomberg-radio-300-330/comment-page-1/#comment-169886</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 00:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26083#comment-169886</guid>
		<description>@CMA

you mean tech is overbought I hope.

As for GM, I wondered that myself...I hope it is just market stupidity, as that is how I intend to make money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CMA</p>
<p>you mean tech is overbought I hope.</p>
<p>As for GM, I wondered that myself&#8230;I hope it is just market stupidity, as that is how I intend to make money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: call me ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/bloomberg-radio-300-330/comment-page-1/#comment-169883</link>
		<dc:creator>call me ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 00:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26083#comment-169883</guid>
		<description>Steve-

I did see the QID went up-  thought it odd with the rest of the market in rally mode-  I think tech in general is oversold

question though- do you find it odd that GM stock is at a 1.61 when GM itself  said it was going to wipe out the shareholders-  seems to me everyone would be running for the exit-

can&#039;t figure it out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve-</p>
<p>I did see the QID went up-  thought it odd with the rest of the market in rally mode-  I think tech in general is oversold</p>
<p>question though- do you find it odd that GM stock is at a 1.61 when GM itself  said it was going to wipe out the shareholders-  seems to me everyone would be running for the exit-</p>
<p>can&#8217;t figure it out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/bloomberg-radio-300-330/comment-page-1/#comment-169876</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 00:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26083#comment-169876</guid>
		<description>Some green shoots for the QID crowd...QQQQ volume finally picked up...3 days of strong volume in a row for the first time since November. And nice divergence...with the Dow up 165 points in 4 days, QID was UP 1.6. &lt;a href=&quot;http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$BPNDX&amp;p=D&amp;yr=3&amp;mn=0&amp;dy=0&amp;id=p52576604621&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NDX Bulls&lt;/a&gt; is off the charts at 86%...can&#039;t get much higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some green shoots for the QID crowd&#8230;QQQQ volume finally picked up&#8230;3 days of strong volume in a row for the first time since November. And nice divergence&#8230;with the Dow up 165 points in 4 days, QID was UP 1.6. <a href="http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$BPNDX&amp;p=D&amp;yr=3&amp;mn=0&amp;dy=0&amp;id=p52576604621" rel="nofollow">NDX Bulls</a> is off the charts at 86%&#8230;can&#8217;t get much higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usphoenix</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/bloomberg-radio-300-330/comment-page-1/#comment-169873</link>
		<dc:creator>usphoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 23:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26083#comment-169873</guid>
		<description>@Leftback:  Thanks for the link on CA RE.  Powerful stuff.  The charts really spell out how we&#039;re just now starting to dip our toes in the real sh*t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Leftback:  Thanks for the link on CA RE.  Powerful stuff.  The charts really spell out how we&#8217;re just now starting to dip our toes in the real sh*t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker from Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/bloomberg-radio-300-330/comment-page-1/#comment-169871</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker from Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 22:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26083#comment-169871</guid>
		<description>@AmenRa

Re: Bove  No kidding.  My thoughts exactly.  I mean really, the SEC should look into these analysts that just seem to be constant cheerleaders for their sector of &quot;expertise.&quot;  And I&#039;m probably being naive&#039; here, it&#039;s probably gone on for decades, but why do these useless analysts not completely lose their credibility and get run out of the business?

I know, I know.  But it&#039;s nice to dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AmenRa</p>
<p>Re: Bove  No kidding.  My thoughts exactly.  I mean really, the SEC should look into these analysts that just seem to be constant cheerleaders for their sector of &#8220;expertise.&#8221;  And I&#8217;m probably being naive&#8217; here, it&#8217;s probably gone on for decades, but why do these useless analysts not completely lose their credibility and get run out of the business?</p>
<p>I know, I know.  But it&#8217;s nice to dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

