<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debunking The Notion Of Too Big To Fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/debunking-the-notion-of-too-big-to-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/debunking-the-notion-of-too-big-to-fail/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:30:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FromLori</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/debunking-the-notion-of-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-172669</link>
		<dc:creator>FromLori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 04:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26674#comment-172669</guid>
		<description>Too big to save should be the motto perhaps if they knew they had to live with consequences of their actions like us mere mortals do they would learn a valuable lesson. I do not think we should be bailing out anyone including the people who took &quot;Liar&#039;s Loans&quot; or those who were greedy thinking it would be a fast way to make a buck or those who used their homes as a means to buy things they could not otherwise afford since when is it acceptable to gamble and make others responsible for your losses?  Having said that this is another &quot;Glaring&quot; hypocrisy....

D-O-U-B-L-E  Standard

http://www.butasforme.com/2009/05/15/video-as-gm-closes-1000-dealers-an-obama-double-standard-emerges/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too big to save should be the motto perhaps if they knew they had to live with consequences of their actions like us mere mortals do they would learn a valuable lesson. I do not think we should be bailing out anyone including the people who took &#8220;Liar&#8217;s Loans&#8221; or those who were greedy thinking it would be a fast way to make a buck or those who used their homes as a means to buy things they could not otherwise afford since when is it acceptable to gamble and make others responsible for your losses?  Having said that this is another &#8220;Glaring&#8221; hypocrisy&#8230;.</p>
<p>D-O-U-B-L-E  Standard</p>
<p><a href="http://www.butasforme.com/2009/05/15/video-as-gm-closes-1000-dealers-an-obama-double-standard-emerges/" rel="nofollow">http://www.butasforme.com/2009/05/15/video-as-gm-closes-1000-dealers-an-obama-double-standard-emerges/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnbougearel</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/debunking-the-notion-of-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-172473</link>
		<dc:creator>johnbougearel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 15:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26674#comment-172473</guid>
		<description>Debunking the &quot;too big to fail&quot; propaganda is a must. At least one Fed official Thomas Hoenig, agrees. 

This propaganda combined with Greenspan and the bnaking industry&#039;s asssumption that the industry was capable of &quot;self-regulation&quot; combined to make a particularly lethal Molotov Cocktail to the US economy. You see, too big to fail meant the banks became implicitly guaranteed by the US govt, or GSE&#039;s. And once they became implicitly guaranteed by the govt, well, then, under the new &quot;self-regulation&quot; regime they could all sorts of recklessly insane self-destructive behaviors, as they ultimately had the govt, i.e. the taxpayers to backstop their chicanery.

No, &quot;too big to fail&quot; is a paradigm that must die. That has to become one of the lessons we takeaway from this crisis. if the banks knew they would beco</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debunking the &#8220;too big to fail&#8221; propaganda is a must. At least one Fed official Thomas Hoenig, agrees. </p>
<p>This propaganda combined with Greenspan and the bnaking industry&#8217;s asssumption that the industry was capable of &#8220;self-regulation&#8221; combined to make a particularly lethal Molotov Cocktail to the US economy. You see, too big to fail meant the banks became implicitly guaranteed by the US govt, or GSE&#8217;s. And once they became implicitly guaranteed by the govt, well, then, under the new &#8220;self-regulation&#8221; regime they could all sorts of recklessly insane self-destructive behaviors, as they ultimately had the govt, i.e. the taxpayers to backstop their chicanery.</p>
<p>No, &#8220;too big to fail&#8221; is a paradigm that must die. That has to become one of the lessons we takeaway from this crisis. if the banks knew they would beco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

