<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geithner&#8217;s Generosity Earns Wall Street&#8217;s Applause</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/geithners-generosity-earns-wall-streets-applause/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/geithners-generosity-earns-wall-streets-applause/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:28:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftback</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/geithners-generosity-earns-wall-streets-applause/comment-page-1/#comment-173357</link>
		<dc:creator>leftback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26922#comment-173357</guid>
		<description>Jack,

Tiny Tim can afford to play nice now that the market is going up, and the Street is &quot;creating wealth&quot; once more.
(He said, with heavy irony.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack,</p>
<p>Tiny Tim can afford to play nice now that the market is going up, and the Street is &#8220;creating wealth&#8221; once more.<br />
(He said, with heavy irony.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruerr</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/geithners-generosity-earns-wall-streets-applause/comment-page-1/#comment-173239</link>
		<dc:creator>bruerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 14:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26922#comment-173239</guid>
		<description>Admin:  Please do not nix out important parts of my post.  This post needs the reference laws to be considered properly.  I do not use too much profanity or post here that often to merit censure.   Please delete the above post and this paragraph and let my post alone.
 

Places where Paulson, Geithner and team did not step up to defend capitalism in a time of crisis, when capitalism might need a defender.  

Because they were focused on a luscious surplus of omissions instead.


TITLE 12 - BANKS AND BANKING
CHAPTER 16 - FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
§ 1831 o. Prompt Corrective Action


1)
U.S. Code, Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831 o Prompt Corrective Action (b)(2)(B)(i) and (d)(1)(A). Capital distributions (dividends) and share buy back programs restricted.

2)
U.S. Code, Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831 o Prompt Corrective Action (i)(1) and (i)(2)(D) restrict the activities of any critically undercapitalized insured depository institution; and at a minimum, prohibit any such institution from doing any of the following: Making any material change in accounting methods.

3)
U.S. Code Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831 o Prompt Corrective Action (i)(1) and (i)(2)(F) restrict the activities of any critically undercapitalized insured depository institution; and at a minimum (emphasis added), prohibit any such institution from doing any of the following … (F) Paying excessive compensation or bonuses.

4)
U.S. Code Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831o. Prompt Corrective Action (i)(1) and (i)(2)(B) … Restricting activities of critically undercapitalized institutions: To carry out the purpose of this section, the Corporation shall, by regulation or order— restrict the activities of any critically undercapitalized insured depository institution; and (emphasis added) … at a minimum, prohibit any such institution from doing any of the following: Extending credit for any highly leveraged transaction.


5) 
U.S. Code Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831 o. Prompt Corrective Action (i)(1) and (i)(2)(C) … Restricting activities of critically undercapitalized institutions: To carry out the purpose of this section, the Corporation shall, by regulation or order— restrict the activities of any critically undercapitalized insured depository institution; and (emphasis added) … at a minimum, prohibit any such institution from doing any of the following: (C) Amending the institution’s charter or bylaws …

6) 
U.S. Code Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831 o. Prompt Corrective Action (i)(1) and (i)(2)(E) … Restricting activities of critically undercapitalized institutions: To carry out the purpose of this section, the Corporation shall, by regulation or order— restrict the activities of any critically undercapitalized insured depository institution; and … at a minimum, prohibit any such institution from doing any of the following: (E) Engaging in any covered transaction (as defined in section 371c (b) of this title).

7) 
U.S. Code Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831 o. Prompt Corrective Action (i)(1) and (i)(2)(A) … Restricting activities of critically undercapitalized institutions: To carry out the purpose of this section, the Corporation shall, by regulation or order— restrict the activities of any critically undercapitalized insured depository institution; AND (emphasis added) at a minimum, prohibit any such institution from doing any of the following … (A) Entering into any material transaction other than in the usual course of business, including any investment, expansion, acquisition (see overnight expansion gifts and acquisitions WaMu, Bear Stearns or Lehman Brothers), sale of assets, or other similar action with respect to which the depository institution is required to provide notice to the appropriate Federal banking agency. …


.

Who else would slink away from defense of capitalism in a crisis?  Paulson to Ben to Timmy:  Omitting to uphold common sense and enforce law that might otherwise protect Americans from debt-offloading abuse.

Surprised?  Wall Street celebrates and ramps up when a number of omissions tell of intent to defraud?  ... The old Wall Street mantra is to break the law and pay for it later if caught, isnt it?  Thought that what they teach upstarts at GS?  Get what money you can into the firm, pushing firm debt obligations on others is as  good as bringing money in - right? 

What could the worst possible consequence be?  Here is a possible consequence:  the old anglo saxon crowd will throw a fund raiser if you get caught by the FDIC.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Bush  

How bad could that be?  Okay might have to shake hands with Mentor Cheney, and Ben Shalom, but you can always wash afterward...  Just look at George Jr.  it did not warp his mind too badly... 

Did it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admin:  Please do not nix out important parts of my post.  This post needs the reference laws to be considered properly.  I do not use too much profanity or post here that often to merit censure.   Please delete the above post and this paragraph and let my post alone.</p>
<p>Places where Paulson, Geithner and team did not step up to defend capitalism in a time of crisis, when capitalism might need a defender.  </p>
<p>Because they were focused on a luscious surplus of omissions instead.</p>
<p>TITLE 12 &#8211; BANKS AND BANKING<br />
CHAPTER 16 &#8211; FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION<br />
§ 1831 o. Prompt Corrective Action</p>
<p>1)<br />
U.S. Code, Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831 o Prompt Corrective Action (b)(2)(B)(i) and (d)(1)(A). Capital distributions (dividends) and share buy back programs restricted.</p>
<p>2)<br />
U.S. Code, Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831 o Prompt Corrective Action (i)(1) and (i)(2)(D) restrict the activities of any critically undercapitalized insured depository institution; and at a minimum, prohibit any such institution from doing any of the following: Making any material change in accounting methods.</p>
<p>3)<br />
U.S. Code Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831 o Prompt Corrective Action (i)(1) and (i)(2)(F) restrict the activities of any critically undercapitalized insured depository institution; and at a minimum (emphasis added), prohibit any such institution from doing any of the following … (F) Paying excessive compensation or bonuses.</p>
<p>4)<br />
U.S. Code Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831o. Prompt Corrective Action (i)(1) and (i)(2)(B) … Restricting activities of critically undercapitalized institutions: To carry out the purpose of this section, the Corporation shall, by regulation or order— restrict the activities of any critically undercapitalized insured depository institution; and (emphasis added) … at a minimum, prohibit any such institution from doing any of the following: Extending credit for any highly leveraged transaction.</p>
<p>5)<br />
U.S. Code Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831 o. Prompt Corrective Action (i)(1) and (i)(2)(C) … Restricting activities of critically undercapitalized institutions: To carry out the purpose of this section, the Corporation shall, by regulation or order— restrict the activities of any critically undercapitalized insured depository institution; and (emphasis added) … at a minimum, prohibit any such institution from doing any of the following: (C) Amending the institution’s charter or bylaws …</p>
<p>6)<br />
U.S. Code Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831 o. Prompt Corrective Action (i)(1) and (i)(2)(E) … Restricting activities of critically undercapitalized institutions: To carry out the purpose of this section, the Corporation shall, by regulation or order— restrict the activities of any critically undercapitalized insured depository institution; and … at a minimum, prohibit any such institution from doing any of the following: (E) Engaging in any covered transaction (as defined in section 371c (b) of this title).</p>
<p>7)<br />
U.S. Code Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831 o. Prompt Corrective Action (i)(1) and (i)(2)(A) … Restricting activities of critically undercapitalized institutions: To carry out the purpose of this section, the Corporation shall, by regulation or order— restrict the activities of any critically undercapitalized insured depository institution; AND (emphasis added) at a minimum, prohibit any such institution from doing any of the following … (A) Entering into any material transaction other than in the usual course of business, including any investment, expansion, acquisition (see overnight expansion gifts and acquisitions WaMu, Bear Stearns or Lehman Brothers), sale of assets, or other similar action with respect to which the depository institution is required to provide notice to the appropriate Federal banking agency. …</p>
<p>.</p>
<p>Who else would slink away from defense of capitalism in a crisis?  Paulson to Ben to Timmy:  Omitting to uphold common sense and enforce law that might otherwise protect Americans from debt-offloading abuse.</p>
<p>Surprised?  Wall Street celebrates and ramps up when a number of omissions tell of intent to defraud?  &#8230; The old Wall Street mantra is to break the law and pay for it later if caught, isnt it?  Thought that what they teach upstarts at GS?  Get what money you can into the firm, pushing firm debt obligations on others is as  good as bringing money in &#8211; right? </p>
<p>What could the worst possible consequence be?  Here is a possible consequence:  the old anglo saxon crowd will throw a fund raiser if you get caught by the FDIC.   <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Bush" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Bush</a>  </p>
<p>How bad could that be?  Okay might have to shake hands with Mentor Cheney, and Ben Shalom, but you can always wash afterward&#8230;  Just look at George Jr.  it did not warp his mind too badly&#8230; </p>
<p>Did it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruerr</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/geithners-generosity-earns-wall-streets-applause/comment-page-1/#comment-173208</link>
		<dc:creator>bruerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26922#comment-173208</guid>
		<description>Places where Paulson, Geithner and team did not step up to defend capitalism in a time of crisis, when capitalism might need a defender.  

Because they were focused on a luscious surplus of omissions instead.

TITLE 12 - BANKS AND BANKING
CHAPTER 16 - FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
§ 1831 o. Prompt Corrective Action

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode12/usc_sup_01_12_10_16.html
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode12/usc_sec_12_00001831—o000-.html


Who else would slink away from defense of capitalism in a crisis?  Paulson to Ben to Timmy:  Omitting to uphold common sense and enforce law that might otherwise protect Americans from debt-offloading abuse.

Surprised?  Wall Street celebrates and ramps up when a number of omissions tell of intent to defraud?  ... The old Wall Street mantra is to break the law and pay for it later if caught, isnt it?  Thought that what they teach upstarts at GS?  Get what money you can into the firm, pushing firm debt obligations on others is as  good as bringing money in - right? 

What could the worst possible consequence be?  Here is a possible consequence:  the old anglo saxon crowd will throw a fund raiser if you get caught by the FDIC.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Bush  

How bad could that be?  Okay might have to shake hands with Mentor Cheney, and Ben Shalom, but you can always wash afterward...  Just look at George Jr.  it did not warp his mind too badly... 

Did it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Places where Paulson, Geithner and team did not step up to defend capitalism in a time of crisis, when capitalism might need a defender.  </p>
<p>Because they were focused on a luscious surplus of omissions instead.</p>
<p>TITLE 12 &#8211; BANKS AND BANKING<br />
CHAPTER 16 &#8211; FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION<br />
§ 1831 o. Prompt Corrective Action</p>
<p>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode12/usc_sup_01_12_10_16.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode12/usc_sup_01_12_10_16.html</a><br />
    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode12/usc_sec_12_00001831—o000-.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode12/usc_sec_12_00001831—o000-.html</a></p>
<p>Who else would slink away from defense of capitalism in a crisis?  Paulson to Ben to Timmy:  Omitting to uphold common sense and enforce law that might otherwise protect Americans from debt-offloading abuse.</p>
<p>Surprised?  Wall Street celebrates and ramps up when a number of omissions tell of intent to defraud?  &#8230; The old Wall Street mantra is to break the law and pay for it later if caught, isnt it?  Thought that what they teach upstarts at GS?  Get what money you can into the firm, pushing firm debt obligations on others is as  good as bringing money in &#8211; right? </p>
<p>What could the worst possible consequence be?  Here is a possible consequence:  the old anglo saxon crowd will throw a fund raiser if you get caught by the FDIC.   <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Bush" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Bush</a>  </p>
<p>How bad could that be?  Okay might have to shake hands with Mentor Cheney, and Ben Shalom, but you can always wash afterward&#8230;  Just look at George Jr.  it did not warp his mind too badly&#8230; </p>
<p>Did it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruerr</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/geithners-generosity-earns-wall-streets-applause/comment-page-1/#comment-173191</link>
		<dc:creator>bruerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26922#comment-173191</guid>
		<description>“I don’t think our government should set caps on compensation,” he said in answering questions at an event at the National Press Club today in Washington. “What I think we need to do is make sure we put in place some broad constraints on the incentives compensation systems create.” (source: Bloomberg article above)

... New Bloomberg headlines:

 Tax Evader Turns to Debt Evader for NY&#039;s Banking Elite.  (How white collar criminals escalate from smaller crimes, to perpetrating larger crime.  And have trouble finding like-minded associates to help them in their endeavors.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I don’t think our government should set caps on compensation,” he said in answering questions at an event at the National Press Club today in Washington. “What I think we need to do is make sure we put in place some broad constraints on the incentives compensation systems create.” (source: Bloomberg article above)</p>
<p>&#8230; New Bloomberg headlines:</p>
<p> Tax Evader Turns to Debt Evader for NY&#8217;s Banking Elite.  (How white collar criminals escalate from smaller crimes, to perpetrating larger crime.  And have trouble finding like-minded associates to help them in their endeavors.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruerr</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/geithners-generosity-earns-wall-streets-applause/comment-page-1/#comment-173190</link>
		<dc:creator>bruerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26922#comment-173190</guid>
		<description>...&quot;  Goldman and Morgan said to apply for  TARP exit &quot; ...  
Ah to be on easy street again.  ...  


All this is preceded by the idea we are in a rally (now that debt has been off loaded onto the common).

Notice also: Now that NY bankers have passed their debt onto others, they have made, material changes in their accounting methods. U.S. Code, Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831 o Prompt Corrective Action (i)(1) and (i)(2)(D) restrict the activities of any critically undercapitalized insured depository institution; and at a minimum, prohibit any such institution from doing any of the following: Making any material change in accounting methods.

They get a taste for rally off this accounting trick and then - are in a hurry to go private again.

That is so they can privatize their profits again:

now that the common is shouldering their debt obligations.

The NY banking community are so transparent. They are appearing more and more like a group of mentally ill opportunist who are salacious and careening to get rid of their debt, and then a polar extreme - desperate to privatize their gains again.

Someone should write a song for their children to sing: Gloriously: NY bankers pass their debt onto the common and slink away from defense of capitalism, during crisis periods, when capitalism might need a defender. NY banks then want to privatize their profits. Privatize their gains during the good years. Have one bad year in the cycling of capitalism and there is Paulson as their front man, to unload their debt onto others.

Chorus: In a hurry to offload their debt obligations, and in a hurry to be private again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8221;  Goldman and Morgan said to apply for  TARP exit &#8221; &#8230;<br />
Ah to be on easy street again.  &#8230;  </p>
<p>All this is preceded by the idea we are in a rally (now that debt has been off loaded onto the common).</p>
<p>Notice also: Now that NY bankers have passed their debt onto others, they have made, material changes in their accounting methods. U.S. Code, Title 12, Chapter 16, § 1831 o Prompt Corrective Action (i)(1) and (i)(2)(D) restrict the activities of any critically undercapitalized insured depository institution; and at a minimum, prohibit any such institution from doing any of the following: Making any material change in accounting methods.</p>
<p>They get a taste for rally off this accounting trick and then &#8211; are in a hurry to go private again.</p>
<p>That is so they can privatize their profits again:</p>
<p>now that the common is shouldering their debt obligations.</p>
<p>The NY banking community are so transparent. They are appearing more and more like a group of mentally ill opportunist who are salacious and careening to get rid of their debt, and then a polar extreme &#8211; desperate to privatize their gains again.</p>
<p>Someone should write a song for their children to sing: Gloriously: NY bankers pass their debt onto the common and slink away from defense of capitalism, during crisis periods, when capitalism might need a defender. NY banks then want to privatize their profits. Privatize their gains during the good years. Have one bad year in the cycling of capitalism and there is Paulson as their front man, to unload their debt onto others.</p>
<p>Chorus: In a hurry to offload their debt obligations, and in a hurry to be private again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/geithners-generosity-earns-wall-streets-applause/comment-page-1/#comment-173145</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 09:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26922#comment-173145</guid>
		<description>Waiting for the correction in May is somehow just as tedious as waiting for the rally was in March. 
Thanks Jack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waiting for the correction in May is somehow just as tedious as waiting for the rally was in March.<br />
Thanks Jack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily trade prep: look out above edition &#171; Mr. Unexpectedly</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/geithners-generosity-earns-wall-streets-applause/comment-page-1/#comment-173138</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily trade prep: look out above edition &#171; Mr. Unexpectedly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 07:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26922#comment-173138</guid>
		<description>[...] Jack McHugh (summary, no charts) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jack McHugh (summary, no charts) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

