New Posts . . .

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 29th, 2009, 7:20AM

Took forever to get home from Indianapolis yesterday — 90 minute flight, with weather and congestion delays. took far too many hours. I am still recovering, but it was a great conference and the trip was well worth it. I love speaking to sophisticated farmers and ranchers who run a cooperative power association — surprisingly savvy folks, smarter than the geniuses who caused the meltdown.

Anyhow, I have a a few posts today after the open today, but here’s what I am looking at this morning:

Why the Bulls Just Won’t Die (Barron’s)

Profit Rebound Still Has Long Climb Back (WSJ)

Profits Squeezed at the Margin (Barron’s)

Banks Balk at U.S. Push to Rein In Derivatives (WSJ)More Homeowners Facing Foreclosure (NYT)

Bernanke Bid to Lift Housing Scuttled by Rising Rates, Defaults (Bloomberg)

Borrowers with good credit fuel foreclosures in 1Q (AP)

Did the CRA cause the mortgage market meltdown? (Minnesota Fed)

The Big Banks’ Best Friend in Washington (Washington Post)

Credit Relief May Not Last Long (NYT)

Roubini Finds Economy Even He Can Be Bullish On (Bloomberg)

Banks’ Appraisal Conflicts Could Continue Under New HVCC Rules Cuomo’s office: “GSE’s knew they were buying loans with appraisal fraud…” : “Outside industry experts on Bank of America’s advisory council, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said they had hoped Countrywide’s shady past would be cleaned up within a year of the new ownership. But nearly a year later, we’ve learned that the Charlotte-based BofA has simply assumed the same practices that branded Countrywide a financial predator.”

Even Minsky Would be Shocked at This “Moment”

Email this post Print this post
By Jack McHugh - May 29th, 2009, 1:01AM

Good Evening: U.S. stocks rose today, as some well spun economic data and an upward reversal in Treasury securities combined to support the major averages. Though durable goods orders and jobless claims came in “better than expected”, the news behind the headlines was less than reassuring. And though it didn’t seem to affect the bank stocks today, word from the Mortgage Bankers Association that more than 10% of U.S. mortgages are now either delinquent or in foreclosure indicates that forecasts for a bottom in housing next month are more than a bit premature. To better understand just how so many borrowers wound up in the soup during this cycle, let’s journey back a decade or two and examine what Hyman Minsky and Jim Grant had to say about how economic stability itself would have a hand in today’s Great Recession.

Up, but loitering not far from yesterday’s close, U.S. stock index futures began to rally this morning in the wake of the first economic reports. First out of the chute came jobless claims, of which the widely watched initial claims ticked down a bit. But continuing claims, a decent indicator of whether or not those who’ve lost a job can now find another one, rose more than 100K to a new record. By my unscientific reckoning, this certainly is a jobless non-recovery. Also sporting a nifty headline that obscured the warts beneath was the durable goods release for April. Across the screens rolled “Up 1.9%”, but the 1.3% downward revision to the March figures was given short shrift. The headlines won out and stocks popped 1% once the opening bell rang.

The strength was short-lived once the new home sales figures for April were reported thirty minutes into the session. Coming in at 352K versus expectations of 360K, these figures gave little comfort to those trying to spot a bottom in U.S. housing. Close on its heels came word from the Mortgage Bankers Association that mortgage delinquency and foreclosure rates on U.S. mortgages was not falling, but inconveniently rising (see below). 9.12% of all mortgages were delinquent in the first quarter of 2009, a sharp rise from Q4′s 7.88%. Mortgages in the process of foreclosure rose to 1.37%, meaning that more than one in ten borrowers are in some sort of financial distress. Let’s remember that delinquencies are a leading indicator of future distress, so the needle for housing is still pointing south. This news caused the major averages to slip back until they were all down on the day.

But that was it. The lows were in and stocks began a slow and relentless climb right then and there. Helping boost equity prices along the way was a reversal in the Treasury market (see below). After yields set a new high in the morning, an O.K. 7 year note auction and some short covering pushed yields lower in the afternoon. Whether this temporary reprieve for Treasurys actually aided the stock market rally, I have no idea, but new highs for the year in crude oil certainly boosted energy shares. At the bell, the averages posted gains ranging from 0.5% for the Russell 2000 to 1.5% for the S&P 500. Yields on shorter dated Treasurys were a little lower, but those on the long end declined between 12 and 14 bps as the curve flattened. The happy TBT holders I mentioned last night went home 2.4% poorer this afternoon. The dollar was mixed, climbing against the yen and falling against the euro, but commodities once again went their own way. Lower than expected crude oil inventories sparked a rally in the energy complex, and precious metals were firm. The CRB index rose 1.5% today.

Those who two years ago predicted the housing bubble would end in tears were not bearish enough. That a large rise in delinquencies and foreclosures would be accompanied by falling home prices and economic distress was fairly easy to foresee, but what now looks like a bubble in mortgage trouble was a tougher call to make. Attempting to explain how this whole process unfolded, PIMCO’s Paul McCulley turns to the late Hyman Minsky’s theory of economic stability leading to instability (see below). “The Shadow Banking System and Hyman Minsky’s Economic Journey” is a thoughtful essay that tries to explain how mortgage lending practices in the U.S. went from a responsible form of “hedge finance” to the completely irresponsible practices of “ponzi finance”.

I think if he was alive today, Hyman Minsky would be shocked by how far into the ponzi realm U.S. finance wandered during the late housing bubble, and we’ve certainly had our “Minsky moment”. Mr. McCulley mostly succeeds in reducing into 12 pages what could easily fill an entire book. Minsky’s theory of stability breeding instability fits nicely, though I wish Mr. McCulley had mentioned the Fed’s role in this process. I was also disappointed that he took only a vague and half-hearted swipe at Alan Greenspan’s shameful stewardship as during the bubble years, but I guess he’s showing Sir Alan what I’ll kindly call “professional courtesy” (The Maestro is a consultant to PIMCO).

As with Keynes before him, Hyman Minsky’s contribution to economic theory is undeniable. Minsky first published his views on what would later cripple our financial markets way back in 1986, but the Austrian school of economics merits mention on this topic, too. Jim Grant called upon the Austrians for help and went on to add his own penetrating insights in his 1996 book, “The Trouble With Prosperity”. In Jim’s view, booms and busts are natural parts of capitalism, that each leads to the other as night follows day. As he states in the Introduction:

“Booms do not merely precede busts. In some important sense, they cause them. This idea, on which so much of the analysis of these pages rests, is borrowed from the Austrian School of economics. It was the Austrians who observed that people in markets periodically miscalculate together.”

One of his main points is that, by intervening to prevent the pain of economic downturns, we can hinder the upside (or, worse, allow imbalances to build up until they reach the catastrophic proportions that wreaked so much havoc in 2008). Creative destruction and the healthy clearing away of the cyclical debris shouldn’t be stymied. Japan’s post-bubble malaise during the 1990′s is a prominently cited example of this short-sighted tinkering, but Jim took the Alan Greenspan Fed to task on this very subject in both the book and subsequent essays. Jim turned out to be so spectacularly right on this subject that he can be forgiven for being more than a decade too early in worrying about the U.S. financial system. In closing let me say that the published works of both Minsky and Grant should be required reading for any new Fed governor. It’s more than a shame these foresightful insights were ignored by the Maestro; it’s appalling.

– Jack McHugh

U.S. Stocks Rise, Led by Banking, Energy Shares as Bonds Gain
Treasuries Rise as Yields, ‘Difficult’ Economy Bolster Demand
Mortgage Delinquencies Rise to Record on Job Losses
The Shadow Banking System and Hyman Minsky’s Economic Journey, by PIMCO’s Paul McCulley

Which Mac Laptop ?

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 28th, 2009, 7:30PM

I am in the market for a new laptop — the wife’s old G4 iBook just won’t cut it (damned spinning beach ball!).

Last week, we hit an Apple store, all set to buy a MacBook Pro — when they all but talked us out of it.

Any ideas or suggestions? I don’t mind my Dell desktop, but I hate the Fujitsu Windows touch screen notebook. Thus, I will stick w/Apple.

Of the various Apple notebooks, any much better or worse?

Is there any reason NOT to get the 15 inch MacBook Pro?

New Home Sales

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - May 28th, 2009, 6:20PM

April New Home Sales, a measure of contract signings for the purchase of
new homes, totaled 352k annualized, 8k less than expected and March was
revised down by 5k to 351k. However, months supply fell to 10.1 from
10.6 and it’s the lowest inventory relative to sales since Feb ’08. The
absolute # of homes fell by 13k to the lowest since May ’01 as builders
continue to build less in response to the obvious lack of demand and
also due to the competition of foreclosures. To put in perspective the
absolute # of new homes for sale, at 297k is about 50k below the average
since 1970. The median new home price was down 14.9% y/o/y but rose 3.7%
m/o/m. Relative to March, sales were unchanged in the Northeast and
Midwest, fell slightly in the West but rose a touch in the South.
Net-net, while this is an important read on the housing market, existing
home sales make up more than 80% of all sales, thus making yesterday’s
data point more relevant to the markets.

DISCLAIMER

Although the information contained herein has been obtained from sources
Miller Tabak + Co., LLC believes to be reliable, its accuracy and
completeness cannot be guaranteed. This report is for informational
purposes only and under no circumstances is it to be construed as an
offer to sell, or a solicitation to buy, any security. At various times
we may have positions in and effect transactions in securities referred
to herein. Any recommendation contained in this report may not be
appropriate for all investors. Trading options is not suitable for all
investors and involves risk of loss. Although the information contained
in the subject report (not including disclosures contained herein) has
been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, the accuracy and
completeness of such information and the opinions expressed herein
cannot be guaranteed. An options disclosure document may be obtained
from Mr. Jay Stenberg, Miller Tabak + Co., LLC., 331 Madison Avenue, New
York, NY 10017. Additional information is available upon request.

Member NYSE, NASD, CBOE, PHLX, ISE, NFA.

Member SIPC.

data

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - May 28th, 2009, 4:51PM

Initial Claims totaled 623k, 5k less than expected but last week was
revised up by 5k to 636k, so a push. Continuing Claims continued higher
and rose to a new record coming in 43k more than estimated. The claims
data continues to be influenced by the goings on in the auto sector both
in terms of auto plant shutdowns and dealer uncertainty and closings.
Apr Durable Goods rose 1.9% headline and .8% ex transports, both well
above expectations BUT Mar was revised much lower. Also, Non Defense
Capital Goods ex Aircraft, the pure cap ex component, fell 1.5% after
dropping 1.4% in Mar. New Orders of vehicles and parts rose after 6 mo’s
of declines and fits with the thesis that the massive inventory drawdown
seen may be followed by replenishment. Shipments, which gets directly
plugged into GDP, fell by .2%. The inventory to shipments ratio did fall
to 1.88 from 1.89 and has been stable at this elevated level since Jan
at the highest levels since ’92.

DISCLAIMER

Although the information contained herein has been obtained from sources
Miller Tabak + Co., LLC believes to be reliable, its accuracy and
completeness cannot be guaranteed. This report is for informational
purposes only and under no circumstances is it to be construed as an
offer to sell, or a solicitation to buy, any security. At various times
we may have positions in and effect transactions in securities referred
to herein. Any recommendation contained in this report may not be
appropriate for all investors. Trading options is not suitable for all
investors and involves risk of loss. Although the information contained
in the subject report (not including disclosures contained herein) has
been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, the accuracy and
completeness of such information and the opinions expressed herein
cannot be guaranteed. An options disclosure document may be obtained
from Mr. Jay Stenberg, Miller Tabak + Co., LLC., 331 Madison Avenue, New
York, NY 10017. Additional information is available upon request.

Member NYSE, NASD, CBOE, PHLX, ISE, NFA.

Member SIPC.

Blaming Clinton?

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 28th, 2009, 4:30PM

Interesting Sunday Times Magazine article on Bill Clinton. The part I found most intriguing was about the regulatory acts that the Clinton administration was  responsible for:

“One thing that thrived during Clinton’s presidency, the economy, has wilted of late. The economic boom of the 1990s created nearly 23 million new jobs during his eight years, but today, the economy is shedding hundreds of thousands of jobs a month. While this has stoked nostalgia for the prosperity of the Clinton era, it has also focused new scrutiny on his record. What role did Clinton’s policies play in creating the conditions that led to the Great Recession?

When the subject came up during our conversation in Chappaqua, Clinton calmly dissected the case against him and acknowledged that in at least some particulars his critics have a point. In almost clinical form, as if back at Oxford as a Rhodes scholar, he broke down the case against him into three allegations: first, that he used the Community Reinvestment Act to force small banks into making loans to low-income depositors who were too risky. Second, that he signed the deregulatory Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in 1999, repealing part of the Depression-era Glass-Steagall Act that prohibited commercial banks from engaging in the investment business. And third, that he failed to regulate the complex financial instruments known as derivatives.

As we have tirelessly detailed, the CRA issue is a wingnut non-starter. But the other two critiques are on target:

The first complaint Clinton rejects as “just a totally off-the-wall crazy argument” made by the “right wing,” noting that community banks have not had major problems. The second he gives some credence to, although he blames Bush for, in his view, neutering the Securities and Exchange Commission . . . 

Clinton argued that the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act set up a framework for overseeing the industry.

Um, no. Its not the cause of the crisis, but the repeal of Glass Steagall Act made the damage that much worse. And, it can also be argued these banks became too big to manage, and that added to the problems.

As the the CFMA: 

Then there are the derivatives. There, Clinton pleads guilty. Alan Greenspan, the Federal Reserve chairman, opposed regulation of derivatives as they came to the fore in the 1990s, and Clinton agreed. “They argued that nobody’s going to buy these derivatives, we’ll do it without transparency, they’ll get the information they need,” he recalled. “And it turned out to be just wrong; it just wasn’t true.” He said others share blame, including credit-rating agencies that underestimated the risk. But he accepts responsibility as well. “I very much wish now that I had demanded that we put derivatives under the jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that transparency rules had been observed and that we had done that. That I think is a legitimate criticism of what we didn’t do.” He added: “If you ask me to write the indictment, I’d say: ‘I wish Bill Clinton had said more about derivatives. The Republicans probably would have stopped him from doing it, but at least he should have sounded the alarm bell.’ ”

Fascinating stuff . . .

>

Source:
The Mellowing of William Jefferson Clinton
PETER BAKER
NYT, May 26, 2009

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/31/magazine/31clinton-t.html

Tech Investor News

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 28th, 2009, 2:30PM

Nice new aggregator for Technology company: techinvestornews.com.

>

click for site

tech-investor-news

Equity returns/REAL vs NOMINAL

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - May 28th, 2009, 12:09PM

With the possibility of inflation finally on many investor radar screens
and certainly in the context of the current era of quantitative easing,
looking at the current equity rally in terms of inflation is an
important perspective in determining what was real and what was
inflation induced. At 900 in the S&P 500, we’ve seen a 35% nominal rally off the intraday low of 666 on March 6th. Using the CRB index to measure commodity inflation, the REAL return, from that date, has been just 11.5% as on March 6th the S&P 500 bought 3.23x the CRB index and today it can buy 3.6x. There is no question that the economy has gotten less worse and considering the dramatic market declines year end ’08 thru March, a sharp rally was to be expected but the Fed’s money printing (among other central banks) is also helping to give the impression of health.

New Home Sales Fall 34%

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 28th, 2009, 10:48AM

Another month, another disasterous housing data point:

Sales of new one-family houses in April 2009 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 352,000, according to estimates released jointly today by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. This is 0.3 percent (±14.5%)* above the revised March rate of 351,000, but is 34.0 percent (±11.0%) below the April 2008 estimate of 533,000.

The median sales price of new houses sold in April 2009 was $209,700; the average sales price was $254,000.  Median prices of a new home decreased 14.9%

The seasonally adjusted estimate of new houses for sale at the end of April was 297,000. This represents a supply of 10.1 months at the current sales rate.

Note (once again) that the monthly data is statistical noise at 0.3% with a ±14.5% margin of error; the annual fall of 34% is statistically significant versus 11% error).

The usual headlines got it wrong:

Bloomberg: New-Home Sales in U.S. Climbed 0.3% to 352,000 Pace

Marketwatch:  Home sales up paltry 0.3% 

Reuters: US new home sales rose 0.3 percent in April

• Associated Press: April new home sales inch upward 

WSJ: New-Home Sales Rise as Prices Tumble

No, we cannot accurately state that home sales went up in April 2009. Yes, we do know that sales fell (between 23% and 45%) year over year. 

Note the Non-seasonally adjusted pattern is typical; the sales data follows the historical trend. 

Bottom line: Yet another bad RE number.

>

nhsapril09nsa

via Calculated Risk

>

Source:
NEW RESIDENTIAL SALES IN APRIL 2009
Manufacturing and Construction Division
MAY 28, 2009 AT 10:00 A.M. EDT http://www.census.gov/const/newressales.pdf

New-Home Sales in U.S. Climbed 0.3% to 352,000 Pace 
Bob Willis
Bloomberg, May 28 2009

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&sid=a_syIHolWEnY&

New Home Sales, Permits & Starts

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 28th, 2009, 9:45AM

This morning, I am in Indianapolis, delivering the keynote speech to the ACES Power conference, an annual gathering of regional power providers. I won’t get to look at the New Home Sales for a while.

Y’all can fill in the details when the 10:00am news gets released. Meanwhile, let’s contextualize the data, by looking at a longer chart of Permits and Starts, (via Ron Griess of The Chart Store):

 
>

5-22-09-housing-1

>
5-22-09-housing-2

43 queries. 1.006 seconds.