<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stock Broker in the News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/stock-broker-in-the-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/stock-broker-in-the-news/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:22:42 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Words from the (investment) Wise: 5.17.09 &#124; The Big Picture</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/stock-broker-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-172443</link>
		<dc:creator>Words from the (investment) Wise: 5.17.09 &#124; The Big Picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 10:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26113#comment-172443</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: Dilbert.com (via Barry Ritholtz&#8217;s The Big Picture). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: Dilbert.com (via Barry Ritholtz&#8217;s The Big Picture). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How the Common Man Sees It</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/stock-broker-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-170113</link>
		<dc:creator>How the Common Man Sees It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 04:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26113#comment-170113</guid>
		<description>@Marcus Aurelius Says: May 9th, 2009 at 9:00 am

&lt;i&gt;In 1929, Joe Kennedy got out of the market when his shoe shine boy started giving him stock tips. &lt;/i&gt;

That is what he said publicly, but, according to this, he had insider warning that gave him advance notice of what was going to happen:

Excerpt from Chapter 23 of The Creature From Jekyll Island:

&lt;i&gt;Mellon (Secretary Treasury) was even more
emphatic. Herbert Hoover described Mellon&#039;s views
as follows:

Mr. Mellon had only one formula: &quot; liquidate
labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers,
liquidate real estate&quot; He insisted that, when
people get an inflation brainstorm, the only way
to get it out of their blood is to let it
collapse. He held that even a panic was not
altogether a bad thing. He said &quot;It will purge the
rottenness out of the system. High costs of living
and high living will come down. People will work
harder live a moral life. Values will be adjusted,
and enterprising people will pick up the wrecks
from less competent people&quot;

If this had been the mindset between Mellon and
Norman and the Federal Reserve Board, the purpose
of their meetings would have been to make sure
that, when the implosion happened, the central
banks could coordinate their policies. Rather than
be overwhelmed by it, they should direct it as
best the can and turn it ultimately into their
advantage. Perhaps we shall never know if that
scenario is accurate, but the events that followed
strongly support such a view.

ADVANCE WARNING FOR MEMBERS ONLY

Immediately after the meetings, the monetary
scientists began to issue warnings to their
colleagues in the financial fraternity to get
out of the market. On February 6, the Federal
Reserve issued an advisory to its member banks to
liquidate their holdings in the stock market. The
following month, Paul Warburg gave the same advice
in the annual report to the stockholders of his
International Acceptance Bank He explained the
reason for this advice:

If the orgies of unrestrained speculation are
permitted to spread, the ultimate collapse is
certain not only to affect the speculators
themselves, but to bring about a great depression
involving the entire country.

Paul Warburg was a partner with Kuhn, Loeb &amp; Co.
which maintained a list of preferred customers.
These were fellow bankers, wealthy industrialists,
prominent politicians, and high officials in
foreign governments. A similar list was maintained
at J.P. Morgan Co.. It was customary to give these
men advance notice on important stock issues and
an opportunity to purchase them at two to fifteen
points below their price to the public. That was
one of the means by which investment bankers
maintained influence over the affairs of the
world. The men on these lists were notified of the
coming crash.

John D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, Joseph P.
Kennedy, Bernard Baruch, Henry Morgenthau, Douglas
Dillon - the biographies of all the Wall Street
giants at that time boast that these men were
&quot;wise&quot; enough to get out of the stock market just
before the Crash. And it is true. Virtually all of
the inner club was rescued. There is no record of
any member of the interlocking directorate between
the Federal Reserve, the major New York banks, and
their prime customers having been caught by
surprise. Wisdom, apparently, was greatly
affected by whose list one was on&lt;/i&gt;

You can read the entire chapter here:

http://tinyurl.com/pup9of</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marcus Aurelius Says: May 9th, 2009 at 9:00 am</p>
<p><i>In 1929, Joe Kennedy got out of the market when his shoe shine boy started giving him stock tips. </i></p>
<p>That is what he said publicly, but, according to this, he had insider warning that gave him advance notice of what was going to happen:</p>
<p>Excerpt from Chapter 23 of The Creature From Jekyll Island:</p>
<p><i>Mellon (Secretary Treasury) was even more<br />
emphatic. Herbert Hoover described Mellon&#8217;s views<br />
as follows:</p>
<p>Mr. Mellon had only one formula: &#8221; liquidate<br />
labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers,<br />
liquidate real estate&#8221; He insisted that, when<br />
people get an inflation brainstorm, the only way<br />
to get it out of their blood is to let it<br />
collapse. He held that even a panic was not<br />
altogether a bad thing. He said &#8220;It will purge the<br />
rottenness out of the system. High costs of living<br />
and high living will come down. People will work<br />
harder live a moral life. Values will be adjusted,<br />
and enterprising people will pick up the wrecks<br />
from less competent people&#8221;</p>
<p>If this had been the mindset between Mellon and<br />
Norman and the Federal Reserve Board, the purpose<br />
of their meetings would have been to make sure<br />
that, when the implosion happened, the central<br />
banks could coordinate their policies. Rather than<br />
be overwhelmed by it, they should direct it as<br />
best the can and turn it ultimately into their<br />
advantage. Perhaps we shall never know if that<br />
scenario is accurate, but the events that followed<br />
strongly support such a view.</p>
<p>ADVANCE WARNING FOR MEMBERS ONLY</p>
<p>Immediately after the meetings, the monetary<br />
scientists began to issue warnings to their<br />
colleagues in the financial fraternity to get<br />
out of the market. On February 6, the Federal<br />
Reserve issued an advisory to its member banks to<br />
liquidate their holdings in the stock market. The<br />
following month, Paul Warburg gave the same advice<br />
in the annual report to the stockholders of his<br />
International Acceptance Bank He explained the<br />
reason for this advice:</p>
<p>If the orgies of unrestrained speculation are<br />
permitted to spread, the ultimate collapse is<br />
certain not only to affect the speculators<br />
themselves, but to bring about a great depression<br />
involving the entire country.</p>
<p>Paul Warburg was a partner with Kuhn, Loeb &amp; Co.<br />
which maintained a list of preferred customers.<br />
These were fellow bankers, wealthy industrialists,<br />
prominent politicians, and high officials in<br />
foreign governments. A similar list was maintained<br />
at J.P. Morgan Co.. It was customary to give these<br />
men advance notice on important stock issues and<br />
an opportunity to purchase them at two to fifteen<br />
points below their price to the public. That was<br />
one of the means by which investment bankers<br />
maintained influence over the affairs of the<br />
world. The men on these lists were notified of the<br />
coming crash.</p>
<p>John D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, Joseph P.<br />
Kennedy, Bernard Baruch, Henry Morgenthau, Douglas<br />
Dillon &#8211; the biographies of all the Wall Street<br />
giants at that time boast that these men were<br />
&#8220;wise&#8221; enough to get out of the stock market just<br />
before the Crash. And it is true. Virtually all of<br />
the inner club was rescued. There is no record of<br />
any member of the interlocking directorate between<br />
the Federal Reserve, the major New York banks, and<br />
their prime customers having been caught by<br />
surprise. Wisdom, apparently, was greatly<br />
affected by whose list one was on</i></p>
<p>You can read the entire chapter here:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/pup9of" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/pup9of</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/stock-broker-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-170084</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 21:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26113#comment-170084</guid>
		<description>dh, 

also, see: http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/mortgage-duration-risk-the-banks-are-no-longer-the-problem/#comments

and art&#039;s in comments..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dh, </p>
<p>also, see: <a href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/mortgage-duration-risk-the-banks-are-no-longer-the-problem/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/mortgage-duration-risk-the-banks-are-no-longer-the-problem/#comments</a></p>
<p>and art&#8217;s in comments..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/stock-broker-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-170076</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 20:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26113#comment-170076</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m fascinated that the papers haven’t said much about Fannie Mae’s newest troubles.&quot;

dh, 

if the MSM followed of the &quot;Trash Trucks&quot; dumping their &#039;impaired assets&#039; into the Landfill that is Frannie/Freddie--Phoney/Phraudie, somebody would have to do &#039;something&#039; about it/it&#039;d be a photon-stream that would cast those &#039;green shoots&#039; into a whole new spectrum of recognition..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m fascinated that the papers haven’t said much about Fannie Mae’s newest troubles.&#8221;</p>
<p>dh, </p>
<p>if the MSM followed of the &#8220;Trash Trucks&#8221; dumping their &#8216;impaired assets&#8217; into the Landfill that is Frannie/Freddie&#8211;Phoney/Phraudie, somebody would have to do &#8217;something&#8217; about it/it&#8217;d be a photon-stream that would cast those &#8216;green shoots&#8217; into a whole new spectrum of recognition..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wunsacon</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/stock-broker-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-170066</link>
		<dc:creator>wunsacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 18:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26113#comment-170066</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; by the way, the new Star Trek movie is the best one yet, gang.

I will go reluctantly...  Looks like it will be just another Hollywood action movie.  I guess I&#039;m being parodied here:

http://www.theonion.com/content/video/trekkies_bash_new_star_trek_film?utm_source=a-section

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; by the way, the new Star Trek movie is the best one yet, gang.</p>
<p>I will go reluctantly&#8230;  Looks like it will be just another Hollywood action movie.  I guess I&#8217;m being parodied here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/trekkies_bash_new_star_trek_film?utm_source=a-section" rel="nofollow">http://www.theonion.com/content/video/trekkies_bash_new_star_trek_film?utm_source=a-section</a></p>
<p> <img src='http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/stock-broker-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-170021</link>
		<dc:creator>R.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 15:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26113#comment-170021</guid>
		<description>Rosie ROCKs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosie ROCKs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dead hobo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/stock-broker-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-169942</link>
		<dc:creator>dead hobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 13:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26113#comment-169942</guid>
		<description>BR,

I listened to a lot of your visit to Bloomberg Radio yesterday. I liked your take on W vs L uncertainty. Me too. I vacillate on both. I&#039;m going to split the baby and converge it into a semi-W, the last leg up will look like  a wavey, anemic check mark that is struggling with gravity.

Disagree on oil. The consumer might drive off on vacation if speculators weren&#039;t driving up the price of gas while a glut of oil exists. That theory sounds more like a sales pitch you bought into than solid economic logic. Given your astute insight into employment, I don&#039;t think you understand what passes for the middle class any longer and find that surprising. The oil thieves are just working another wealth transfer and Uncle Stupid won&#039;t step in. For some idiotic reason, Uncle Stupid can&#039;t find speculation in the oil markets.

I&#039;m fascinated that the papers haven&#039;t said much about Fannie Mae&#039;s newest troubles. It need another $19 billion from Uncle Stupid and will need lots more in the future, or so it says. I suppose that doesn&#039;t follow the current theme of less bad is really good.  They&#039;ll probably get the cash quietly, the MSM will ignore it and more idiots will ignore the frail state of the consumer economy and buy stocks. Whew, the higher it goes, the more it will look like that big 2008 dip when sanity returns.

Is it true that risk, ie big leverage, is financing a lot of the run up now? If so, whatabunchofdumbasses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BR,</p>
<p>I listened to a lot of your visit to Bloomberg Radio yesterday. I liked your take on W vs L uncertainty. Me too. I vacillate on both. I&#8217;m going to split the baby and converge it into a semi-W, the last leg up will look like  a wavey, anemic check mark that is struggling with gravity.</p>
<p>Disagree on oil. The consumer might drive off on vacation if speculators weren&#8217;t driving up the price of gas while a glut of oil exists. That theory sounds more like a sales pitch you bought into than solid economic logic. Given your astute insight into employment, I don&#8217;t think you understand what passes for the middle class any longer and find that surprising. The oil thieves are just working another wealth transfer and Uncle Stupid won&#8217;t step in. For some idiotic reason, Uncle Stupid can&#8217;t find speculation in the oil markets.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m fascinated that the papers haven&#8217;t said much about Fannie Mae&#8217;s newest troubles. It need another $19 billion from Uncle Stupid and will need lots more in the future, or so it says. I suppose that doesn&#8217;t follow the current theme of less bad is really good.  They&#8217;ll probably get the cash quietly, the MSM will ignore it and more idiots will ignore the frail state of the consumer economy and buy stocks. Whew, the higher it goes, the more it will look like that big 2008 dip when sanity returns.</p>
<p>Is it true that risk, ie big leverage, is financing a lot of the run up now? If so, whatabunchofdumbasses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Aurelius</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/stock-broker-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-169939</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Aurelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 13:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26113#comment-169939</guid>
		<description>hipster:

In 1929, Joe Kennedy got out of the market when his shoe shine boy started giving him stock tips. Maybe it&#039;s time to head to the airport and get my Nikes buffed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hipster:</p>
<p>In 1929, Joe Kennedy got out of the market when his shoe shine boy started giving him stock tips. Maybe it&#8217;s time to head to the airport and get my Nikes buffed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: insaneclownposse</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/stock-broker-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-169936</link>
		<dc:creator>insaneclownposse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 12:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26113#comment-169936</guid>
		<description>BR - kudos to you for the mention in &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.barrons.com/article/SB124182262250602213.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Abelson&#039;s column&lt;/a&gt;.

Regarding Rosenberg, obviously he is dead on regarding the state of the economy. (thanks for posting the link) 

However, the economy&#039;s correlation to the stock market is always tenuous. The last recession ended in less than a year, yet the bear market dragged on for an additional 12 months.

If you are looking at macro factors and their impact on the markets, something worth considering is that, during this bear market, we had a genuine crisis of confidence. 
The market is a discounting mechanism - I think we can agree on that - and the nastiest part of this bear was the market pricing in a complete absence of trust in a system that can&#039;t function without it.

I think we can safely say that confidence is making a comeback. Apparently the stock market thinks it is worth something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BR &#8211; kudos to you for the mention in <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB124182262250602213.html" rel="nofollow">Abelson&#8217;s column</a>.</p>
<p>Regarding Rosenberg, obviously he is dead on regarding the state of the economy. (thanks for posting the link) </p>
<p>However, the economy&#8217;s correlation to the stock market is always tenuous. The last recession ended in less than a year, yet the bear market dragged on for an additional 12 months.</p>
<p>If you are looking at macro factors and their impact on the markets, something worth considering is that, during this bear market, we had a genuine crisis of confidence.<br />
The market is a discounting mechanism &#8211; I think we can agree on that &#8211; and the nastiest part of this bear was the market pricing in a complete absence of trust in a system that can&#8217;t function without it.</p>
<p>I think we can safely say that confidence is making a comeback. Apparently the stock market thinks it is worth something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transor Z</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/05/stock-broker-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-169934</link>
		<dc:creator>Transor Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 12:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=26113#comment-169934</guid>
		<description>Also saw Star Trek last night. Very fun movie. Watching a Trek movie with a bunch of MIT kids is like watching a horror movie with a mostly African American audience -- extra fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also saw Star Trek last night. Very fun movie. Watching a Trek movie with a bunch of MIT kids is like watching a horror movie with a mostly African American audience &#8212; extra fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
